1 / 6

INC Report to the NANC October 2001 Norman Epstein INC Moderator

INC Report to the NANC October 2001 Norman Epstein INC Moderator. INC MEETINGS. October 18th, 2001: NPA Workshop Web Conference October 29, 2001: NANPE Workshop Web Conference October 30-31, 2001: LNPA Workshop Web Conf. November 12-16: INC 60 All meeting information can be found at:

perdy
Télécharger la présentation

INC Report to the NANC October 2001 Norman Epstein INC Moderator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INC Report to the NANCOctober 2001Norman EpsteinINC Moderator

  2. INC MEETINGS • October 18th, 2001: NPA Workshop Web Conference • October 29, 2001: NANPE Workshop Web Conference • October 30-31, 2001: LNPA Workshop Web Conf. • November 12-16: INC 60 • All meeting information can be found at: www.atis.org/atis/clc/inc/inccal.htm

  3. CO/NXX WORKSHOP • ORPHANED CODES • INC finished documenting procedures for NANPA, the PA, and SPs to follow when codes with ported out TNs are returned or abandoned. • These procedures, contained in separate appendices, support the interim FCC direction that was provided to NANPA and the PA.

  4. LNPA WORKSHOP Number Portability and Pooling are at a rate center level • Some local calling plans (e.g., Extended Area Service) have different boundaries than rate centers • Some states define rate districts within rate centers as wireline call rating mechanisms • Calling Party call rating for all customers is impacted by the above two points • Different districts/plans are served by distinct NXXs • Therefore, states with different districts/plans should require separate pools within the same rate centerNumbering resources for distinct districts/plans may need to be considered separately for code and block acquisition.

  5. NANP EXPANSION RECOMMENDATION • INC Recommended NANP Expansion Plan Format • The expanded format will be as follows: • NXX(X) + (X)NXX + XXXX • where • NXX (X) a four digit NPA with (X) the additional digit • (X)NXX a four digit Central Office Code with (X) the additional digit • XXXX a four digit line number • Here, the values, • N represents digits 2 through 9, • X represents digits 0 through 9

  6. NANP EXPANSION RECOMMENDATION • Expansion Method 1 (Both Digits Implemented Simultaneously) • NXX(Y) + (Y)NXX + XXXX • Expansion Method 2 (Phased Approach with NPA Implemented First) • NXX (Y) + NXX + XXXX • NXX(Y) + (Y)NXX + XXXX • Expansion Method 3 (Phased Approach with CO Code Implementation First) • NXX + (0)NXX + XXXX • NXX(1) + (X)NXX + XXXX • Y represents 0 or 1.

More Related