1 / 6

What was the challenge?

Multiple Sexual Partnerships in the Context of HIV Prevention: Alternative Methods to Gather Evidence for Programming Around an Under-reported Issue. What was the challenge?.

phil
Télécharger la présentation

What was the challenge?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Multiple Sexual Partnerships in the Context of HIV Prevention:Alternative Methods to Gather Evidence for Programming Around an Under-reported Issue

  2. What was the challenge? • Cohort studies conducted in some parts of Zimbabwe found association between multiple sexual partnerships and HIV infection • Qualitative /anecdotal evidence of multiple partnerships including concurrency • BUT: National DHS 2005 data showing relatively low levels of multiple sexual partnerships • Leading to questions: • Are MCP a key issue to address nationally? • If yes, what can be the objectives & targets for a national programme? • What drives MCP?

  3. What was done? • Bio-behavioural baseline survey (n=4,879) in 16 districts of Zimbabwe using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview (ACASI) • Rapid assessments in 26 districts including 104 focus group discussions with adult men, adult women, young men, young women

  4. What was the result? • Higher levels of multiple partnerships reported in the NBCS baseline using a self-administered method as compared to DHS • Disaggregated data on prevalence of different forms of multiple partnerships • Targets for national program set • Perceived reasons of MCP and related norms established • Developed interventions considering community perceptions on MCP in addition to theory-driven approach (knowledge, risk perception, self-efficacy, social norms) • National program scaled up!

  5. Related information • Zimbabwe stand at AIDS 2010! • Langhaug et al: An evaluation of Zimbabwe’s National Behaviour Change Programme: results of the mid-term evaluation survey (2009). Poster AIDS 2010. • Gregson et al (2010): HIV decline due to reductions in risky sex in Zimbabwe? Evidence from a comprehensive epidemiological review. International Journal of Epidemiology.

  6. Thank you. Merci. Muchas Gracias. спасибо! Danke. Siyabonga. Tatenda.

More Related