1 / 26

Collaborative Document Management Framework & Web 2.0 Strategies for Libraries

Collaborative Document Management Framework & Web 2.0 Strategies for Libraries. Olivier Charbonneau Associate Librarian, Concordia University Montreal www.culturelibre.ca . Outline. (1) Web 2.0 and Marketing. (3) CDMF Agents, Documents Linking Writing Consuming Exchaning.

pilar
Télécharger la présentation

Collaborative Document Management Framework & Web 2.0 Strategies for Libraries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Collaborative Document Management Framework &Web 2.0 Strategies for Libraries Olivier Charbonneau Associate Librarian, Concordia University Montreal www.culturelibre.ca IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  2. Outline (1) Web 2.0 and Marketing (3) CDMF Agents, Documents Linking Writing Consuming Exchaning (2) Web 2.0 Tools Blogs Wikis Social Networking Content Hosting/Sharing (4) Conclusion: Shocking question!?! IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  3. (1) Web 2.0 and Marketing Both are communication and in the context of engaging patrons: Marketing is an objective (What?) “Web 2.0” is a process or set of tool (How?) IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  4. Web 2.0 ™ Tim O’Reilly User Generated Content Collaborative Web Participative Web IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  5. 6 pillars of Web 2.0 Karen A. Coombs, Computers in Libraries (2007): • Radical decentralization • Small pieces loosely joined • Perpetual beta • Remixable content • User as contributor • Rich user experience IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  6. Will we ever let patrons get involved in a library’s key messages? The formal constraint of Web 2.0 implies that the user is responsible for her information environment IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  7. Will we ever let patrons get involved in a library’s key messages? Controlling the message and Web 2.0 don’t mix The formal constraint of Web 2.0 implies that the user is responsible for her information environment IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  8. (2) Web 2.0 Tools Blogs Wikis Social Networks Content Hosting/Sharing IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  9. Of a post… (constructivist approach) IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  10. Web 2.0 Variables 1: Authorship: “authentic” vs. “edited” Access: “open/free” («libre») vs. “closed” But the closer you get to “edited” and “closed” tools, the further you are from Web 2.0 IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  11. (2) Web 2.0 Tools Is there a common thread? Blogs Wikis Social Networks Content Hosting/Sharing IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  12. Source: Wikipedia IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  13. Of a post… (constructivist approach) IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  14. Web 2.0 Variable 2: The fundamental elements of all these tools are the “post” and the “person” IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  15. (3) Collaborative Document Management Framework Conceptual understanding of Web 2.0 tools IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  16. Collaborative Document Management Framework (CDMF) © 2008, Olivier Charbonneau IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  17. Collaborative Document Management Framework (CDMF) - explained Writing Linking Conversations or exchanging Documents Consuming Agents © 2008, Olivier Charbonneau IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  18. Collaborative Document Management Framework (CDMF) - examples Posting / voting (new authority measure) Pages in a Wiki / Linking Blogs trackbacks / Wiki discussions Using Posts (new authority measure) Posts Social Networks © 2008, Olivier Charbonneau IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  19. (4) Shocking Web 2.0 Question!?! How many Internet sites or catalogues (“web presences”) does a library need? IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  20. The usual answer: 1 A very modernist approach, the “perfect” or omniscient website, where everything is organized with a formal ontology IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  21. The usual answer: 1 NOT WEB 2.0 !! (lets try something a bit more post-modern) A very modernist approach, the “perfect” or omniscient website, where everything is organized with a formal ontology IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  22. The imperfect Web 2.0 answer: n where “n” is the distinct number of classes of users, allowing for classes of 1, which leads to infinity IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  23. The formalist Web 2.0 answer: 0 Only in this case will the user truly be in charge of her information environment; Full disintermediation and dematerialization IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  24. The formalist Web 2.0 answer: 0 My favorite! (Libraries have one website too many) Only in this case will the user truly be in charge of her information environment; Full disintermediation and dematerialization IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  25. Beware of the technological imperative Don’t ask how you should use technology, but if this technology aids your “business processes” or “marketing goals” IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

  26. A moment of zen… and the end. Olivier Charbonneau, BCom, LLM Associate Librarian, Concordia University o.charbonneau@concordia.ca www.culturelibre.ca IFLA M&M Pre-Conference Stockholm 2010

More Related