1 / 27

Using Data to Plan for Effective Professional Development

Using Data to Plan for Effective Professional Development. 2012 NDE Data Conference It’s More Than Numbers April 2-3 Kearney, NE. Sue Anderson, Ph.D., ESU 3 Debbie Schraeder , ESU 3. Session Topics. ESU 3 Rationale for Data Analysis Framework Process Findings Using the Results.

piper
Télécharger la présentation

Using Data to Plan for Effective Professional Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using Data to Plan for Effective Professional Development 2012 NDE Data Conference It’s More Than Numbers April 2-3 Kearney, NE Sue Anderson, Ph.D., ESU 3 Debbie Schraeder, ESU 3

  2. Session Topics • ESU 3 Rationale for Data Analysis • Framework • Process • Findings • Using the Results

  3. Rationale • Understanding student achievement levels will: • assist in planning for effective professional development • assist supporting schools’ improvement efforts

  4. Framework

  5. Data Analysis Framework • 3 Critical Questions • What do the data show? • Why might this be? • How should we respond?

  6. Process

  7. 2010-2011 NeSA Results – ESU 3 School Districts • Data review on December 16, 2011 • Individual • Team Analysis – Content Areas • District level SOSR data – Grades 3-8, 11 • NeSA Math– All students - Overall/Sub Score Performance • NeSA Reading – All students – Overall/Sub Score Performance • NeSA Writing – All students • Demographic Data • Enrollment

  8. Data Sets 2010-2011 NeSA Results – ESU 3 School Districts

  9. Data Sets 2010-2011 Demographic Data– ESU 3 School Districts

  10. Individual Work Review the data content Use the worksheet to record observations and reflections

  11. Group Work Share findings from individual analysis Discuss possible reasons for results • Offer suggestions for appropriate responses

  12. Findings

  13. What Do The Data Show? • 2011 NeSA Reading • Grade 3 (state proficiency – 70.95%)– 3 districts below • Grade 4 (state proficiency – 75.39%) – 6 districts below • Grade 5 (state proficiency – 70.01%)– 4 districts below • Grade 6 (state proficiency – 73.72%)– 1 districts below • Grade 7 (state proficiency – 73.88%)– 3 districts below • Grade 8 (state proficiency – 71.44%)– 2 districts below • Grade 11 (state proficiency – 67.32%) – 5 districts below

  14. What Do The Data Show? 2010 and 2011 NeSA Reading Proficiency Progress • Elementary • Grade 3 – 5 districts (2010/4) • Grade 4 – 4 districts (2010/6) • Grade 5 – 6 districts (2010/4) • Middle • Grade 6 – 5 districts (2010/1) • Grade 7 – 5 districts (2010/3) • Grade 8 – 3 districts (2010/2) • High School • Grade 11 – 2 districts (2010/5)

  15. What Do The Data Show? 2011 NeSA Reading Overall • 9 districts ABOVE at ALL grade levels • 7 districts BELOW at 2 or more grade levels • Comprehension – 8 districts BELOW at 2 or more grade levels • Vocabulary – 6 districts BELOW at 2 or more grade levels 2011 NeSA Reading Sub Scores

  16. What Do The Data Show? • 2010 NeSA Math • Grade 3 (state proficiency – 67.40%) – 6 districts below • Grade 4 (state proficiency – 67.55%) – 9 districts below • Grade 5 (state proficiency – 65.96%) – 6 districts below • Grade 6 (state proficiency – 62.88%) – 5 districts below • Grade 7 (state proficiency – 61.48%) – 5 districts below • Grade 8 (state proficiency – 60.58%) – 5 districts below • Grade 11 (state proficiency – 53.86%) – 6 districts below

  17. What Do The Data Show? 2011 NeSA Math Overall • 5 districts ABOVE at ALL grade levels • 10 districts BELOW at 2 or more grade levels

  18. What Do The Data Show? 2011 NeSA Math Sub Score Results • Number Sense • 8 districts BELOW at 2 or more grade levels • Grades 3, 4, 5, 8 of greatest concern • Algebraic • 9 districts BELOW at 2 or more grade levels • Grades 4, 5, 6, 7,8 of greatest concern • Geometric/Measurement • 9 districts BELOW at 2 or more grade levels • Grades 3, 4, 7, 8 of greatest concern • Data Analysis/Probability • 9 districts BELOW at 2 or more grade levels • Grades 3, 4, 5, 7,8, 11 of greatest concern

  19. What Do The Data Show? • 2011 NeSA Writing • Grade 4 (state proficiency – 4.00) – 2/18 districts below • Grade 8 (state proficiency – 4.33) – 3/18 districts below • Grade 11 (Not Tested) • 15/18 districts meeting or exceeding proficiency at Grades 4 and 8 • 1 district at 100% proficiency at Grades 4 and 8

  20. Why Might This Be? • Impact of student enrollment on proficiency outcomes • Impact of FRL, SpEd, and ELL status on performance • District and building improvement and leadership processes • Levels to which curriculum and NeSA tests are aligned • Levels to which curriculum is articulated vertically and horizontally

  21. How Should We Respond? • Align professional development to school and district outcomes for student achievement • Encourage/support ongoing and focused professional development • Align regional programs to district needs related to improving student achievement • Provide expertise in curriculum and instruction in districts with more limited resources • Assist schools in using data to inform improvement processes

  22. Using the Results

  23. 2010-2011– ESU 3 School District Summary Data

  24. ESU #3 Grade Levels Not Proficient • 2011 NeSA Reading, Math, Writing

  25. ESU #3 Grade Levels Not Proficient • 2011 NeSA Reading, Writing, Math

  26. Using the Results • Share data analysis findings with ESU 3 districts via Professional Development Advisory • Use results to inform decisions about regional professional development offerings • Use results to assist schools in their improvement efforts

  27. Questions/Comments

More Related