1 / 55

Ch 16. Radiation Protection

Ch 16. Radiation Protection. The physics of Radiation Therapy, pp. 200 - 224. 16.1 Dose Equivalent 16.2 Effective Dose Equivalent 16.3 Background Radiation 16.4 Low-Level Radiation Effects 16.5 Effective Dose Equivalent limits 16.6 Structural Shielding Design Primary Radiation Barrier

polk
Télécharger la présentation

Ch 16. Radiation Protection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ch 16. Radiation Protection The physics of Radiation Therapy, pp. 200 - 224

  2. 16.1 Dose Equivalent • 16.2 Effective Dose Equivalent • 16.3 Background Radiation • 16.4 Low-Level Radiation Effects • 16.5 Effective Dose Equivalent limits • 16.6 Structural Shielding Design • Primary Radiation Barrier • Secondary Barrier for Scattered Radiation • Secondary Barrier for Leakage Radiation • Door Shielding • Protection Against Neutrons

  3. 16.1 Dose Equvalent • Factor affecting the biological effects of radiation • Dose • Type of radiation • Dose equivalent (H) • The dosimetric quality relevant to radiation protection H = D • Q D = absorbed dose Q = the quality factor • Units • Sivert (Sv) SI unit • 1 Sv = 1 J/kg • Rem • Unit of dose is rad • 1 rem = 10-2 J/kg (Sv)

  4. 16.1 Dose Equvalent • Quality factor Q • Base on a range RBE related to the LET of the radiation • Independent of the organ or tissue

  5. 16.1 Dose Equivalent • 16.2 Effective Dose Equivalent • 16.3 Background Radiation • 16.4 Low-Level Radiation Effects • 16.5 Effective Dose Equivalent limits • 16.6 Structural Shielding Design • Primary Radiation Barrier • Secondary Barrier for Scattered Radiation • Secondary Barrier for Leakage Radiation • Door Shielding • Protection Against Neutrons

  6. 16.2 Effective Dose Equivalent • Dose equivalent for various tissue may differ markedly • Whole body exposure are rarely uniform • Tissues vary in sensitivity • Effective dose equivalent • The sum of the weighted dose equivalents for irradiated tissues or organs • HE = WTHT • WT = weighting factor of tissue T • HT = the mean dose equivalent by tissue t

  7. Weighting factors • The proportionate risk (stochastic) of tissue when body from risk coefficients

  8. 16.1 Dose Equivalent • 16.2 Effective Dose Equivalent • 16.3 Background Radiation • 16.4 Low-Level Radiation Effects • 16.5 Effective Dose Equivalent limits • 16.6 Structural Shielding Design • Primary Radiation Barrier • Secondary Barrier for Scattered Radiation • Secondary Barrier for Leakage Radiation • Door Shielding • Protection Against Neutrons

  9. 16.3 Background Radiation • Radiation from the natural environment • Terrestrial radiation • e.g. elevation level of radon in many building • Emitted by naturally ocurring 238U in soil • Annual dose equivalent to bronchial epithelium = 24 mSv (2.4 rem) • Cosmic radiation • e.g. air travel • At 30,000 feet, the dose equivalent is about 0.5 mrem/h • Radiation element in our bodies • e.g. mainly from 40K • Emits β, γrays; T1/2 = 1.3 × 109 years

  10. 16.3 Background Radiation • Radiation from various medical procedures • The average annual genetically significant dose equivalent in 1970 = 20 mrem/year • Occupational exposure excluded exposure from • Natural background • Medical procedures

  11. 16.1 Dose Equivalent • 16.2 Effective Dose Equivalent • 16.3 Background Radiation • 16.4 Low-Level Radiation Effects • 16.5 Effective Dose Equivalent limits • 16.6 Structural Shielding Design • Primary Radiation Barrier • Secondary Barrier for Scattered Radiation • Secondary Barrier for Leakage Radiation • Door Shielding • Protection Against Neutrons

  12. 16.4 Low-Level Radiation Effects • Low level radiation < Dose required to produce acute radiation syndrome > Dose limits recommended by the standards

  13. 16.4 Low-Level Radiation Effects • Genetic effects • Radiation-induced gene mutation • Chromosome breaks and anomalies • Neoplastic disease • e.g. Leukemia, thyroid tumors, skin lesions • Effect on growth and development • Adverse effects on fetus and young children • Effect on life span • Diminishing of life span • Premature aging • Cataracts – opacification of the eye lens

  14. The NCRP defines two general categories for harmful effects of radiation Stochastic effects The probability ofoccurrence increases with increasing absorbed dose • The severity doesnot depend on the magnitude of the absorbed dose • All or none phenomenon • e.g. development of a cancer genetic effect • Nothreshold dose Nonstochastic effect • Increase in severity with increasing absorbed dose • Damage to increasing number of cells and tissues • e.g. organ atrophy, fibrosis, cataracts, blood changes, sperm counts • Possible to set threshold dose

  15. 16.1 Dose Equivalent • 16.2 Effective Dose Equivalent • 16.3 Background Radiation • 16.4 Low-Level Radiation Effects • 16.5 Effective Dose Equivalent limits • 16.6 Structural Shielding Design • Primary Radiation Barrier • Secondary Barrier for Scattered Radiation • Secondary Barrier for Leakage Radiation • Door Shielding • Protection Against Neutrons

  16. 16.5 Effective Dose Equivalent limits • The criteria for recommendations on exposure limits of radiation workers • At low radiation levels, the nonstochastic effects are essentially avoided • The predicted risk for stochastic effects should not be greater then the average risk of accidental death among worker in “safe” industries • ALARA principles should be followed • The risk are kept as low as reasonably achievable, taking into account, social and economic factors

  17. “safe” industries are defined as • Annual fatality accident rate of ≦1/ 10,000 workers • An average annual risk = 1 × 10-4 • Data from studies for radiation industries • Average fatal accident rate < 0.3 × 10-4 • The radiation industries is comparatively more “safe” • The total risk coefficient of the radiation industries is assumed to be 1 × 10-2 (1 × 10-4 rem-1) • Equal fatal risk of 1 × 10-4 for the following familiar context • 40,000 miles of travel by air • 6,000 miles of travel by car • 75 cigarettes • Merely living 1.4 days for a man aged 60

  18. Occupational and Public Dose Limits

  19. Occupational and Public Dose Limits

  20. Negligible Individual Risk Level (NIRL) • A level of average annual excess risk of fatal health effects attributable to irradiation, below which further effort to reduceradiation exposure to individual is unwarranted • Trivial compare to the risk of fatality associated with ordinary, normal social activities • Dismissed from consideration • Aim: • having a reasonable negligible risk level that can be considered as a threshold • Below which efforts to reduce the risk further would not be warranted • The annual NIRL = 1 × 10-7 • Corresponding dose equivalent = 0.01 mSv (0.001 rem) • Corresponding life time risk (70 years) = 0.7 × 10-5

  21. Example of risk calculation • Question • Calculation the risk followings: • Radiation workers • Members of the general public • NIRL (corresponding to respective annual effective dose equivalent limits) • Risk coefficient of 10-2Sv-1 (10-4rem-1)

  22. Example of risk calculation • Answer • Annual effective dose equivalent limit for radiation workers = 50 mSv (5 rem) • Annual risk = 5 rem × (10-4 rem-1) • = 5 × 10-4 • Annual effective dose equivalent limit for members of general public = 1 mSv (0.1 rem) • Annual risk = 0.1 rem × (10-4 rem-1) • = 10-5 • Annual effective dose equivalent limit for NIRL = 0.01 mSv (0.001 rem) • Annual risk = 0.001 rem × (10-4 rem-1) • = 10-7

  23. 16.1 Dose Equivalent • 16.2 Effective Dose Equivalent • 16.3 Background Radiation • 16.4 Low-Level Radiation Effects • 16.5 Effective Dose Equivalent limits • 16.6 Structural Shielding Design • Primary Radiation Barrier • Secondary Barrier for Scattered Radiation • Secondary Barrier for Leakage Radiation • Door Shielding • Protection Against Neutrons

  24. Primary Barrier Secondary barrier 16.6 Structural Shielding Design • Design of protective barriers • Ensure that the dose equivalent received by any individual dose not exceed the applicable maximum permissible value • Dose equivalent limits of “controlled area” and “uncontrolled area” • Controlled area: 0.1 rem/wk (5 rem/yr) • Uncontrolled area: 0.01 rem/wk (0.5 rem/yr) • Protection against 3 type of radiation • The primary radiation • The scattered radiation • The leakage radiation (from source housing)

  25. Factors associated with the calculation of barrier thickness • Workload (W) • Use factor (U) • Occupancy factor (T) • Distance (d)

  26. Workload (W) • For <500 kVp x-ray machine • W = Maximum mA × beam “on” time • = min/week • For MV machine • W = weekly dose delivered at 1 m from the source • = no. of patient treated/wk × dose delivered/p’t at 1 m • = rad/wk (at 1m) • Use Factor (U) • U = Fraction of operation time that radiation is directed toward a • particular barrier • Depending on technique use

  27. Occupancy Factor (T) • T = Fraction of operating time during which the area of interest is occupied by the individual • Distance (d) • d = distance from the radiation source to the area to be protected • Applied inverse square law

  28. A. Primary Radiation Barrier • Determine the thickness of the primary radiation barrier • P= Maximum permissible dose equivalent for the area to be protected • Controlled area: 0.1 rad/wk • Non-controlled area: 0.01 rad/wk • B = transmission factor • Determining the barrier thickness by consulting broad beam attenuation curves for the given beam energy

  29. Figure 16.1. Transmission through concrete of x-rays produced by 0.1- to 0.4-MeV electrons, under broad beam conditions Figure 16.2. Transmission of thick-target x-rays through ordinary concrete, under broad-beam conditions

  30. A. Primary Radiation Barrier • The choice of barrier material • e.g. concrete, lead, steel • Depends on structural spatial considerations • Calculation of equivalent thickness of various material • Comparing tenth value layers (TVL) for the given beam energy

  31. B. Secondary Barrier for Scattered Radiation • Factors affecting the amount of scattered radiation • Beam intensity • Quality of radiation • The area of the beam at scatterer • The scattering angle

  32. For MV beams, αusually be assumed at 90° scatter = 0.1%

  33. B. Secondary Barrier for Scattered Radiation • Energy of the scatter • For orthovoltage radiation • Beam energy: Scatter = incident (assumed) • For MV beams • Beam energy at 90° scattered photon = 500 keV • Transmission of 500 kVp useful beam • Relatively lower energy in compare with the incident energy • Beam softening by Compton effect

  34. α－ fractional scatte (1 cm from scatterer; Beam area 400 cm2 incident at the scatterer) d － source to scatterer distance d’ － scatterer to the area of interest area F － area of the beam incident at the scatterer • Transmission factor of BS is required to reduced the scattered dose to the accepted level P • The barrier transmission of the scattering beam • The required thickness of the barrier can be determined for appropriate transmission curve

  35. C. Secondary Barrier for Leakage Radiation • Described in the NCRP Report No. 102 • The recommended leakage exposure rate for different energy of the beams (< 500 kVp) 5-50 kVp • <0.1 R (in any h at any point 5 cm from the source) > 50 kVp, < 500 kVp • < 1 R (in 1 h, at 1 m from the source) • < 30 R/h at 5 cm

  36. C. Secondary Barrier for Leakage Radiation • The recommended absorbed dose rate for different energy of the beam (> 500 kVp) > 500 kVp • < 0.2% of the useful beam dose rate • (any point outside the max field size, within a circular plane of radius 2 m) Cobalt teletherapy • Beam “off” position • < 2mrad/h (on average direction, 1m from the source) • < 10 mrad/h (in any direction, 1m from the source) • Beam “on” position • < 0.1% of the useful beam dose rate (1 m from the source)

  37. Transmission factor (BL)to reduce the leakage dose to the maximum permissible level (P) For machine < 500 kVp For MV machine I = maximum tube current Reason for “× 60”: conversion from h to min (R/h to R/min), ∵unit of W is mA-min/week Reason for “×0.001”: 0.1% leakage limit through the source housing

  38. The required thickness of the barrier can be determined for transmission curve of the primary beam • The quality of radiation: leakage ~ primary beam

  39. For MV machine • Leakage radiation > Scattered radiation (∵penetrating power of leakage radiation is greater) • For lower energy x-ray beam: • Leakage radiation ~ scattered radiation • For primary radiation barrier • Adequate protect against leakage & scattered radiation • For secondary radiation barrier • Calculate the difference between HVL required for scattering and leakage • > 3 HVL • Choose the thicker one • < 3 HVL • Choose the thicker one + 1 HVL

  40. D. Door Shielding • Advantages of the maze arrangement in treatment room • Reduces the shielding requirement of the door • Expose mainly to multiply scattered radiation Radiation experience scatter at least twice

  41. D. Door Shielding • The required door shielding • Repeat calculation of the barrier transmission factor BS by tracing different path of the scattered radiation • The attenuation curve of 500 kVp is used ∵Compton scatter of MV radiation at 90° < 500 kVp • In most cases, the required thickness of door shielding is < 6 mm lead

  42. E. Protection against Neutrons • Neutron contamination • High energy photon (> 10 MV) or electrons incident on the various materials of target, flattening filter, collimators and other shielding components • Increase rapidly in the range of 10 – 20 MV beam energy • The energy spectrum of emitted neutrons • Within the beam :range 1 MeV • Inside of the maze:few fast neutrons (> 0.1 MeV)

  43. E. Protection against Neutrons • Protection against neutrons should be considered in door shielding only • 1° and 2° barriers for x-ray shielding are adequate • Solution • Increase reflection from the walls by accelerator configuration • Longer maze (> 5 m) • Add a hydrogenous material (e.g. polyethylene, few inches) • Add steel or lead sheet

  44. E. Protection against Neutrons • Neutron capture γrays • Generated by thermal neutrons absorbed by the shielding door • Spectrum energies up to 8 MeV (mostly 1 MeV) • Solution • Thick lead sheet (high enerjgy γray) • Longer maze (reduce neutron fluence) • Practically, treatment room with long maze, the intensity of neutron capture γrays is low

  45. Thanks for your attention!

More Related