1 / 21

Black Hole Fueling

Image from ESO. Black Hole Fueling. Accretion to Supermassive Black Hole. 10^6Mo 10^8 yr. a: Ho, Filippenko & Sargent 1997a. Angular Momentum Problem. Specific angular momentum of matter at r=10kpc to the last stable orbit: 100,000:1 At 200pc, L is still a factor of 1000 too large…

pooky
Télécharger la présentation

Black Hole Fueling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Image from ESO Black Hole Fueling

  2. Accretion to Supermassive Black Hole 10^6Mo 10^8 yr a: Ho, Filippenko & Sargent 1997a

  3. Angular Momentum Problem • Specific angular momentum of matter at r=10kpc to the last stable orbit: 100,000:1 • At 200pc, L is still a factor of 1000 too large… What mechanisms drive gas clouds from kpc to subpc? • Gravitational Torque (by Bars) • Dynamical Friction • Viscous Torque

  4. Dominant Fueling Mechanism(large to intermediate scale: 10kpc -> 1kpc) Bar exerts torque on gas clouds at large radii (~few kpc) Due to their collisional and dissipative nature, **Clouds lose L gradually and can be driven by the bar potential to few-hundred pc

  5. Stars and gas in a barred potential Figures from Buta & Combes 1996 Illustration Credit: Frattare (STScI)

  6. Yea! Way to go, our gas cloud Outer ILR Inner ILR

  7. What happen to our gas cloud!? • Gas-populated orbits change their orientation only gradually due to shocks • When clouds reach OILR, the negative torque exert on the cloud cause it to lose significant L • Radial inflow slows as gas cross IILR… • Gas are trapped in the IILR in a form of ring

  8. CO concentration Jogee at al. 2004c Barred (Large scale) Galaxies - High concentration of CO and H alpha at the centers of the starburst galaxies - Relatively low concentration at the center for non-starbursts - See a “ring” of gas surrounding the center of galaxy

  9. Surface density is derived from the CO (J=1-0) Jogee at al. 2004c Non-Starbursts: - “Ring” located at the peak of the curve? - Gas surface density increases, stop rising then drop Starbursts: - Gas surface density keep rising A higher resolution is need to probe the gas in the inner 100pc region…

  10. Relation btw Large-scale bars and starburst Statistical Studies of 12um (Seyfert) Galaxies Hunt & Malkan 1999 SB+SAB SAB Compared to Extended 12um Sample (E12GS) unbarred Overall: Fraction of large-scale bar (SB+SAB) is larger in starbursts (82-85%) than in the normal (61-68%) ones Data Bins: S0a and earlier (T≤ 0); Sa, Sab (0< T≤ 2); Sb, Sbc (2< T≤ 4); Sc, Scd (4< T≤ 6); Sdand later (6< T)

  11. Barred Galaxy = AGN?? • Galaxies with LS-Bar are more likely to harbor AGN • Yet, theory suggest LS-Bar can only drive gas to r=100s pc • For AGN, there must be some other mechanisms to drive gas from few 100s to sub-pc • Thus, we DO NOT expect all barred galaxies to show AGN activity

  12. The journey from few-100s to tens pc • If Ωn≠Ωp, bar decoupling happens • Secondary/Nuclear Bar (200-1600pc) exerts a negative torque • Counterclockwise rotation of the nuclear bar is a possible outcome of Merger! • Simulations: decouple phase with Ωn>Ωp can remove L effectively

  13. Example of nuclear stellar bar feeding Jogee, Kenney, & Smith 1999

  14. More recent example (NUGA) Garcia-Burillo et al. 2005

  15. Nuclear Bars = AGN? • Theoretically, nuclear bar help to solve the L problem one step further, to few tens pc • NOT ALL nuclear bars are expected to be effective in removing L (depends on the pattern speeds) • Alternative: SN, Cloud-Cloud collision?

  16. Final destination to SMBH • At 100pc, L is still 100 times too large to get into subpc scales • Dynamical friction becomes important • As the gas cloud loses momentum, SMBH dominates the potential • Cloud being tidal disrupted, forming a disk around the SMBH • Viscous Torque kicks in

  17. Different time scales for an infalling 1e7 solar-mass cloud DF time scale becomes effective as the gas cloud reaches 100s pc scales Jogee et al. 1999

  18. Tidal disruption of Giant Cloud => L redistribution BEKKI 2000 N=5000

  19. Accreting Mass into MBH MBH is in unit of 10^7 solar mass (same as the mass of cloud) Significant amount of gas fit into a lower angular momentum orbit Few percent of gas in the clump is found to be transferred in to subpc region What else are important for feeding in a sub-pc region? Magnetic Field

  20. Baby N-body simulation N = 100 T=1.5Myr T=0 T=1Myr T=2.5Myr T=3Myr T=2Myr

  21. Q & A + Thanks

More Related