1 / 30

Elevating Work Platform Campaign 2013-2014

Elevating Work Platform Campaign 2013-2014. Name: Stuart Davis Position: Principal Adviser (Construction Engineering) Contact: 3247 9484. WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY QUEENSLAND. Elevating Work Platform Campaign. Commencing August/September 2013 Re-visit 2014.

Télécharger la présentation

Elevating Work Platform Campaign 2013-2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Elevating Work Platform Campaign 2013-2014 Name: Stuart Davis Position: Principal Adviser (Construction Engineering) Contact: 3247 9484 WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY QUEENSLAND

  2. Elevating Work Platform Campaign Commencing August/September 2013 Re-visit 2014

  3. Elevating Work Platforms Some points of note with EWP’s • Increasing trend of incidents, • Greater use in construction industry, • More complex units, • Plant being used for more diverse jobs, • Operator skill level at times lacking, • No WHSQ campaign in recent history.

  4. EWP - Audit Issues What will WHSQ look at? • Ground support, • EWP condition, • EWP use, • Fall arrest harness issues, • Training and competency, • Plant interaction with other workers.

  5. EWP – Ground Support Ground support, inspector will look for: • Wheels sinking in ground, • Drop offs (steps) in work zone, • Pit covers, • Working near excavations/trenches, • Some situations inspector may require verification from Geotech Engineer

  6. Boom lift in Sydney - 2013

  7. Ground Support Example Inspector notes: • Boom lift EWP working under bridge, • Evidence of wheels sinking, • Natural ground, no engineer certification, • Prohibition notice, • Prepare ground for EWP loads – point loading to be less than that allowed by engineer

  8. EWP – Condition (1) What will WHSQ look for? • Obvious damage & neglect, • Daily operator pre-start checks – simple • 3 month periodical inspections • Annual inspection safety inspections • Major (10 year) inspection,

  9. EWP – Condition (2) What will WHSQ look for? • Obvious damage or rust – Unit prohibited • Generally Improvement Notice for annual safety inspection. • Prohibition notice obvious unsafe condition

  10. EWP – Major inspection • Major inspections specified in AS 2550.10 • Can be enhanced inspection where gradual & comprehensive • But most owners don’t do this • Default to 10 year interval with strip down • Preferable by manufacturer or Engineer • But not covered by Regulation like mobile cranes – Inspector needs evidence of poor condition to enforce

  11. JLG 33 HD – Knuckle Boom – levelling system failure Serious incident – Seized pin

  12. EWP – Training & Competency (1) • Training/skill questions (HRWL, Yellow card, familiarisation training, etc) • Inspector to observe operation – some cases directions may be given to PCBU, • Operators operating EWP boom length 11 m or more – no HRWL – stop work (applies even with “lock off system”),

  13. EWP – Training & Competency (2) • WHSQ will be encouraging documented familiarisation training • Working with industry to develop preferred set of pro-forma checklists • Generally will not receive enforcement action unless clear example that operator is incompetent

  14. EWP – Use (1) • Capacity platform not being exceeded, • Platform not being used to push vertical or horizontal, • Where small steel work lifted – to be on engineer designed racks, • Large surface areas (i.e. aircon ducts) - wind loading verification, • Confined areas ( too tight, crush hazards)

  15. SIDE LOAD ENGINEERING or MANUFACTURER CERTIFICATION REQUIRED

  16. EWP – Use (2) Work suitability issues - • Not being used to lift suspended loads, • Being loaded on tilt tray safely – always winch unit onto tilt-tray, • No standing on mid or top rails • No dropping loads onto basket • Proper precautions if using to access area (i.e. onto roofs)

  17. EWP – Use (3) Work suitability issues - • Not being used close to excavations, • Not being used as a crane (with suspended load),

  18. Fall Arrest Lanyard Type • Standard industry practice to use 1.8 or 2.0 m lanyards. • At low heights and in small platforms with top anchor points, occupant could hit ground under certain heights (i.e. 3 to 4 m) • Recommend shorter lanyards in some situations (i.e. 1.2 m lanyards for certain applications). • What about inertia reels (fall arrest blocks)? – • Normally have to be above head height to operate. • More prone to contamination and wear • But if acts on horizontal could be used.

  19. Small EWP platform with top anchored lanyard attachment point – 1.2 m lanyard is reasonable

  20. Larger EWP platform with bottom anchored lanyard attachment point – 1.8 m lanyard is reasonable

  21. Lanyard on Scissor Lift EWPs? • Lanyards not recommended on scissor lifts. Why? • If scissor lifts fails fall vertically down or onto its side – fall arrest harness will not arrest fall. • Some argue that harnesses are good to contain users on platform, but guardrail does this. • Lanyards & harnesses could encourage persons to climb onto mid rail or out of unit.

  22. No harnesses – standing on mid rail – unsafe.

  23. What to expect Inspectors will follow Departmental policy. • Technical guidance to be provided to inspectors Enforcement types: • Agreed action (able to rectify while onsite) • Improvement notice • Prohibition notice • Infringement notices

  24. WHSQ documentation Audit tools will be made progressively available to industry Campaign reports on the audits will be produced by WHSQ

More Related