SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Evaluating Minnesota's Educational Effect Sizes: Insights from TIMSS and PISA Assessments

quincy avatar
19 diapositives · 330 Views · Sep 02, 2014

This analysis examines Minnesota's educational performance through effect sizes derived from international assessments like TIMSS and PISA from 1995 to 2011. It highlights improvements in scores and the effectiveness of new standards implemented during these years. We explore whether effect sizes are consistent across assessments, compare gains and gaps, and how Minnesota's outcomes relate to national benchmarks. By engaging stakeholders, we facilitate discussions on the implications of these results for educational policy.

Evaluating Minnesota's Educational Effect Sizes: Insights from TIMSS and PISA Assessments - slide 1
01 / 19Evaluating Minnesota's Educational Effect Sizes: Insights from TIMSS and PISA Assessments
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating Minnesota's Educational Effect Sizes: Insights from TIMSS and PISA Assessments
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Effect Sizes State, national and international assessments

  2. Effect sizes • How are we doing compared to others? • Tip sheet • Compliments the p-value • Effect size gives you an idea (visual) of the size of the difference • Estimated magnitude of a relationship

  3. The Minnesota Case • Participated in TIMSS 1995, 2007, 2011 as ‘mini-nation’ • Implemented new standards in 1995, 2007 that make content coverage more closely resemble that of TIMSS test • Scores generally improved from 1995 to 2011, and MN saw faster growth than US as a whole • Engaged education stakeholders, business community, general public in discussion of TIMSS results, what they meant, and how they could inform policy

  4. Questions to answer • Are effect sizes consistent across assessments? • Do gains/gaps compare across tests? • Consistent with policy in your state?

  5. Benchmarking Performance Gr8 MathEffect sizes 2001 TIMSS and 2012 PISA

  6. Benchmarking Performance Gr8 MathEffect sizes 2011 TIMSS, NAEP and 2012 PISA

  7. Benchmarking Performance Gr8 MathEffect sizes 2001 TIMSS and 2012 PISA

  8. Benchmarking Performance Gr8 MathEffect sizes 2011 TIMSS, NAEP and MCA

  9. On to grade 4

  10. Benchmarking Performance Gr 4 MathEffect sizes in 2011 TIMSS

  11. Benchmarking Performance Gr 4 MathEffect sizes in 2011 TIMSS and NAEP

  12. Benchmarking Performance Gr 4 MathEffect sizes in 2011 TIMSS and 2011, 2013 NAEP and MCA

  13. Changes over time

  14. Math Effect sizes for 8th grade on MCA, NAEP and TIMSS MN Math test changed in 2011

  15. Math Effect sizes for 8thgrade on MCA, NAEP and TIMSS 2007-2011 MN Math test changed in 2011

  16. Math Effect sizes for 8thgrade on MCA and NAEP 2007-2013

  17. Math Effect sizes for 4th grade on MCA and NAEP 2007-2013 MN Math test changed in 2011

  18. Math Effect sizes for 4thgrade on MCA, NAEP and TIMSS 2007-2011 MN Math test changed in 2011

  19. Math Effect sizes for 4th grade on MCA and NAEP 2007-2013