210 likes | 370 Vues
This document delves into the properties and sizes of nuclei, focusing on nuclear deformations, electrostatic moments, and the impact of finite charge distributions. It presents a systematic analysis of monopole, dipole, and quadrupole moments within the context of Coulomb interactions. The significance of nuclear symmetry and parities in experimental observations is discussed, alongside the implications for matter-antimatter asymmetry. Recent experimental results on neutron electric dipole moments and methods in nuclear spectroscopy are also highlighted, providing valuable insights into the intricate nature of nuclear structures.
E N D
Sizes Gross Properties of Nuclei Nuclear Deformations and Electrostatic Moments
z e |e|Z q Coulomb Fields of Finite Charge Distributions arbitrary nuclear charge distribution with normalization Coulomb interaction Expansion of for |x|«1: «1 Nuclear Deformations
z e |e|Z q Monopoleℓ = 0 Dipole ℓ = 1 Quadrupole ℓ =2 Multipole Expansion of Coulomb Interaction Point Charges Nuclear Deformations Nuclear distribution
A Quantal Symmetry symmetric nuclear shape symmetric invariance of Hamiltonian against space inversion both even or odd Nuclear Deformations n even p = +1n odd p = -1 If strong nuclear interactions parity conserving
Restrictions on Nuclear Field Expt: No nucleus with non-zero electrostatic dipole moment Consequences for nuclear Hamiltonian (assume some average mean field Uifor each nucleon i): Nuclear Deformations Average mean field for nucleons conserves p inversion invariant, e.g., central potential
Neutron Electric Dipole Moment ? qn =0, possible small dn ≠0.CP and P violation could explain matter/antimatter asymmetry Measure NMR HF splitting for Transition energiesDw=4dnE B=0.1mG, tune with Bosc B. E = 1MV/m w= 30Hz spin-flipof ultra-cold (kT~mK)Ekin=10-7eV, l =670Åneutrons in mgn.bottleguided in reflecting Ni tubes Nuclear Deformations
Experimental Results for dn dn experimental sensitivity From size of neutron (r0≈ 1.2fm): dn 10-15 e·m.So far, only upper limits for dn PNPI (1996): dn < (2.6 ± 4.0 ±1.6)·10-26 e·cm ILL-Sussex-RAL (1999): dn < (-1.0 ± 3.6)·10-26 e·cm Nuclear Deformations
z q’ Intrinsic Quadrupole Moment Consider axially symmetric nuclei (for simplicity), body-fixed system (’), z =z’ symmetry axis Sphere: Nuclear Deformations Q0 measures deviation from spherical shape.
z z z z z b a Collective and s.p. Deformations collectivedeformationdisc collectivedeformationcigar single particlearound core singleholearound core Q0>0 “prolate” Q0<0 “oblate” Planar single-particle orbit: Nuclear Deformations Ellipsoidprincipal axes a, b Deformation parameter d
z’ y’ q x’ Spectroscopic Quadrupole Moment z body-fixed {x’, y’, z’}, Lab {x, y, z}Symmetry axis z defined by the experiment intrinsic What is measured in Lab system? finite rotation through q Measured Q depends on orientation of deformed nucleus w/r to Lab symmetry axis. define Qz as the largest Q measurable. How to control or determine orientation of nuclear Q? Nuclear spin to symmetry axis, no quantal rotation about z’ Nuclear Deformations
Angular Momentum and Q Qz =maximum measurable maximum spin (I) alignment Legendre polyn. complete basis set z I Nuclear Deformations I couples with I to L =2 I Spins too small to effect alignment of Q in the lab.
z Vector Coupling of Spins I≠0: mI=I q Any orientation quadratic dependence of Qz on mI Nuclear Deformations “The” quadrupole moment
z F+DF E+DE F E Electric Multipole Interactions Inhomogeneous external electric field exerts a torque on deformed nucleus. orientation-dependent energy WQExamples: crystal lattice, fly-by of heavy ions Axial symmetry of field assumed: Taylor expansion of scalar potential U: no mixed dervs. Nuclear Deformations monopole WIS dipole 0 quadrupole WQ WIS: isomer shift, WQ: quadrupole hyper-fine splitting
Maxwell equs. No external charge axial symm Electric Quadrupole Interactions =Uzz Nuclear Deformations Field gradient x spectroscopic quadrupole moment mI2
mI=±2 excitedstate I=2 mI=±1 mI=0 E2 isomer shift I=0 mI=0 ground stateUzz=0 Uzz≠0 dN/dEg Uzz=0 Eg Quadrupole Hyper-Fine Splitting Use external electrostatic field, align Q by aligning nuclear spin I,Measure interaction energies WQ (I >1/2 ) Quadrupole hyper-fine splitting of nuclear or atomic energy levels • Slight “hf” splitting of nuclear and atomic levels in Uzz≠0 • splitting of g emission/absorption lines • Estimates: atomic energies ~ eVatomic size ~ 10-8cmpotential gradient Uz ~ 108V/cmfield gradient Uzz ~ 1016V/cm2Q0 ~ 10-24 e cm2 • WQ~ 10-8 eV small ! Nuclear Deformations
. .. . I=8 I=6 I=4 I=2 Experimental Methods for Quadrupole Moments • Small “hf” splitting WQ of nuclear and atomic levels in Uzz≠0 • splitting of X-ray/ g emission/absorption lines Measurable for atomic transitions with laser excitations nuclear transitions with Mössbauer spectroscopy muonic atoms: 107 times larger hf splittings WQ with X-ray and g spectroscopy scattering experiments Uzz(t) Nuclear spectroscopy of collective rotations model for moment of inertia Nuclear Deformations I=0
z b a Collective Rotations b : deformation parameter Nuclei with large Q0 consistent w. collective rotations lanthanides, actinides Nuclear Deformations Wood et al.,Heyde
Systematics of Electric Quadrupole Moments Mostly prolate (Q>0) heavy nuclei Q(167Er) =30R2 odd-Nodd-Z Q>0 : e.g., hole in spherical core pattern not obvious. If such nuclei exist, weak effect of hole for Q Prolate Tightly bound nuclei are spherical: “Magic” N or Z = 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126, … Nuclear Deformations Q<0 : e.g., extra particle around spherical core. pattern recognizable Oblate 8 20 28 50 82 126
Q0 Systematics Q0 large between magic N, Z numbersQ0≈0 close to magic numbers Nuclear Deformations Møller, Nix, Myers, Swiatecki, LBL 1993
No more deformations! Nuclear Deformations