1 / 11

Where does risk come from? A story from a small state in upstate New York

Where does risk come from? A story from a small state in upstate New York. National Research Council, “Red Book” Model of Risk Analysis (1983). Steps in Formal Risk Analysis. Research Hazard identification Exposure assessment Risk characterization Risk communication Risk management.

rae-bolton
Télécharger la présentation

Where does risk come from? A story from a small state in upstate New York

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Where does risk come from?A story from a small state in upstate New York ESPP-78

  2. National Research Council, “Red Book” Model of Risk Analysis (1983) ESPP-78

  3. Steps in Formal Risk Analysis • Research • Hazard identification • Exposure assessment • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management ESPP-78

  4. Analytic Methods for Toxic Chemicals and Their Limitations • Short-term tests (problem: reductionism) • Bioassays (problem: interspecies extrapolation) • choice of test animals • routes of exposure • dose-response issues • Epidemiology (problem:confounding factors) ESPP-78

  5. Social Construction of Risk Models • What causal understandings are built into the risk assessment model? • E.g., Cancer begins with a single mutation. • Which parameters are important? • E.g., For cancer causation, what matters is level of exposure, chemical structure, DNA repair. • What measures and methods are used to characterize those parameters? • E.g., structure-activity studies, animal studies, biological uptake from environment ESPP-78

  6. Model: From Mouse to Man ESPP-78

  7. Biases that may overstate risk • Conservative assumptions in QRA • use of most sensitive species • considering all routes of exposure • use of high-dose testing • Low-dose extrapolation (ignoring possible mechanisms and thresholds) • Tilt toward human-made hazards (e.g., pesticides vs. “natural carcinogens”) ESPP-78

  8. Biases that may understate risk • Synergistic effects (multiple exposures) • Vulnerable or non-standard populations • Tilt toward “natural” rather than social or behavioral causes • ignoring behavior as an element of risk • Bias toward “known” scenarios and available evidence ESPP-78

  9. Risk Management Strategies • Zero risk (no animal carcinogens in food) • De minimis risk (<10-6 lifetimecancerrisk) • Safety (no observable effect level or NOEL) • Acceptable risk (regulatory standard) • Risk tradeoffs • risks vs. benefits (disease vs. income, speed, connectivity, choice) • risks vs. risks (epidemic vs. drug reaction) ESPP-78

  10. Ethical Issues in Risk Analysis • Preventive policy: no “body counts” • No human experimentation • But is it permissible to test low-level exposures on consenting subjects? • Ethical treatment of animals • How conservative should the analyst be? ESPP-78

  11. The Analytic-Deliberative model of Risk Analysis ESPP-78

More Related