1 / 21

Historic Political Tools

Historic Political Tools. The Role of Violence, Coups and Revolutions. History doesn’t stay in the past Elite groups endure; hard to displace; possible Applies to governing instruments too Tools used to take and use power Interested in violence, coups and revolutions

rafer
Télécharger la présentation

Historic Political Tools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Historic Political Tools The Role of Violence, Coups and Revolutions

  2. History doesn’t stay in the past • Elite groups endure; hard to displace; possible • Applies to governing instruments too • Tools used to take and use power • Interested in violence, coups and revolutions • Think of bad, old movies set in LA

  3. Violence • Coercive force • Especially associated with authoritarian rule • Unaccountable to public • Unrestrained by law • Characterizes much of LA’s history

  4. Coup • Coup d'état = golpe de estado • Military force used to change govt • Five models • Historic • Personal • Could turn into personal dictatorships • Institutional

  5. Bureaucratic Authoritarian: • Institutional and transformational • Emerging: Ecuador, 2000; Honduras, 2009 • Military takes power but hands over to civilians immediately • Reform coup • Brazil-1889; Venezuela-1945, 1957, 1992; Peru-1968 • Counter-coup • Coup against coupsters

  6. What recent model suggests • Civil elites pass buck to soldiers • Soldiers break impasse among civvies • Civil unrest still worries soldiers • But mil-gov not practical now hand-back • Remember about military as elite • Some places more than others

  7. Last question: Why mil-gov not useful? • When: post-Bureaucratic Authoritarian • Why: Extreme levels of violence + poor economic management • Even in Chile; disastrous in Argentina • Arg mil stayed on sidelines in 2001-2 collapse • People are poisoned! • Post-Cold War: Utility declines

  8. Revolutions • Broadest: Armed overthrow of government; so includes golpes • Narrower: Armed overthrow of govt that produces long term changes • New elite or new forces join elite • New policies • New groups admitted to citizenship • Examples: English Revo, 1689; American Revo, 1775-83; LA independence

  9. Narrowest: Social Revolution: Armed overthrow of govt that brings long-term changes to govtand produces major social changes • Hierarchy of power and prestige • Examples: France, 1789; Mexico, 1910; Russia, 1917; China, 1949, Cuba, 1959 • Preferred usage in PoliSci and SocSci

  10. Peaceful revolutions? Possible • Successful: Post- Communist Eastern/Central Europe • Failed: Guatemala, 1944-54; Chile, 1970-73 • Early days yet: Venezuela, 1998 • Look at Mexico, Bolivia, Cuba, Nicaragua

  11. Mexico, 1910 • What happened • PorfirioDíaz, Francisco Madero, Pancho Villa, Emiliano Zapata, etc. • Nationalist & reformist • Constitution of 1917 • Ten violent years + 10 more before stability • 1929: PNRPRMPRI

  12. Outcomes • More national control of economy • Rise of a Mexican middle class • Sometimes called last bourgeois revolution • Significant economic development, 1930s-70s • Has stuck, though much changed • Many in PoliSci say it isn’t a social revo • Peasants and workers still excluded • Cf. France, 1789

  13. Bolivia, 1952-1964 • What happened • MNR, COB, Victor Paz Estenssoro, los indigenas – the Indian majority • Nationalize mines; end semi-feudal servitude for indigenous; land reform • Nationalist revolution • But armed peasants and workers

  14. Soon encountered economic dificulties • Divisions within the MNR • A move to the right under pressure from Washington • By 1964 falls to a golpemilitar • Had aspects of a social revolution • Couldn’t consolidate political side

  15. Cuba, 1959- • Last Spanish colony • Then US neo-colony • Little democracy; much dictatorship • Important: Guerrilla insurgency • Guerrilla – military strategy • Guerrilla – political strategy • First guerrilla insurgency to take power in LA

  16. Lots of imitators over next 30 years • Cuba special: very brief insurgency: 3 yrs • Nicaragua: 18 yrs; China: 22 yrs • Cuba special 2: New Socialist Man • Pursued from ‘59 to Fidel’s illness, 2006 • Culture/values > economics: Marxist? • Now changing under Raúl: Chinese or Vietnamese model: communist capitalism

  17. Nicaragua, 1979-1990 • Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional, FSLN • Guerrilla: 1961-79 • Fought Somozas • Split in ‘77 among three “tendencies” • Reunitedform 9-man National Directorate • Won with multi-class alliance; many radical Christians

  18. Governing Junta, 1979-84 • Elections, mainly clean, 1984: FSLN wins • Daniel Ortega president; power shifts from 9 to him • Counterinsurgent war, 1981-90 • Elections, ‘90, FSLN loses big; goes into opposition

  19. Sandinistas important for two reasons • Multi-class alliance brings victory; not just peasants and workers • Accept electoral loss; not a vanguard party with a dictatorship of the proletariat

  20. Revolutions in retrospect • Mexico’s stuck best, then Cuba’s; Nica and Bolivia bring up the rear • All sought to remake society • Mexico had most luck, then Cuba • Had to be political revolutions, too

  21. Violence in retrospect • Any government can use violence • Authoritarian, non-democratic, govts most prone to do so. Why? • Unaccountable and opaque • Won’t leave power if they don’t want to • Problem in LA (elsewhere, too) • Long non-democratic history makes force still look like the best answer.

More Related