1 / 17

CSC ttH(Hbb) further analysis

CSC ttH(Hbb) further analysis. Chris Collins-Tooth 12/11/2008. Motivation. Some late changes were made to the CSC note “cut-based” analysis. I felt that I didn’t have time to look at the effects on background shape (which were especially bad for ttjj).

raina
Télécharger la présentation

CSC ttH(Hbb) further analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CSC ttH(Hbb) further analysis Chris Collins-Tooth 12/11/2008

  2. Motivation • Some late changes were made to the CSC note “cut-based” analysis. • I felt that I didn’t have time to look at the effects on background shape (which were especially bad for ttjj). • I also did not get chance to examine the effect of these cuts on truth-matching of reconstructed tLep, tHad, Higgs and WHad.

  3. Effect of unwinding various late-stage cuts on distributions • (a) CSC note distributions 30 fb-1…(”the problem”!) • (b) Relax b-tag cut from 5.5 to 4.5 • (c) = (b)+consider ALL jets >4.5 as bJets (not just top four) • (d) =(c)+increase LightJet weights by +1.0 instead of +0.9 • (e) =(d)+don’t rescale leptonic W before combining with a b-jet • (f) =(e)+Mt window from ±25GeV to ±20GeV • (g) =(f)+MWlep window from ±60GeV to ±25GeV (a) Mean=118.5 s=22.85 Limited by ttjj statistics MH MH

  4. Effect of unwinding various late-stage cuts on distributions • (a) CSC note distributions 30 fb-1…(”the problem”!) • (b) Relax b-tag cut from 5.5 to 4.5 • (c) = (b)+consider ALL jets >4.5 as bJets (not just top four) • (d) =(c)+increase LightJet weights by +1.0 instead of +0.9 • (e) =(d)+don’t rescale leptonic W before combining with a b-jet • (f) =(e)+Mt window from ±25GeV to ±20GeV • (g) =(f)+MWlep window from ±60GeV to ±25GeV (a) Resolution of signal MH peak not reflected in this plot. Binning unhelpful too! Mean=118.5 s=22.85 Limited by ttjj statistics MH MH

  5. Unwinding cuts..effect on ttjj (a) ttjj CSC (b) btag4.5. (ttjj larger)  (c) bthreshold off (d) LightJets wt+1.0 (e) Wlep rescale off (f) Mt ±20 GeV (g) MWlep±25 GeV

  6. Unwinding cuts..effect on ttjj (a) ttjj CSC (b) btag4.5. (ttjj larger)  (c) bthreshold off (d) LightJets wt+1.0 Slightly better S/B here (e) Wlep rescale off (f) Mt ±20 GeV (g) MWlep±25 GeV Possibly the smoothest..Could be just binning/statistics Appears to peak lower than signal.. BUT 196/86 (2.3) times more ttjj

  7. Unwinding cuts.. effect on signal • Basically very little effect; • relaxing btag cut to 4.5 multiplies signal by 1.3 (c.f. 2.3 for ttjj) • Other cuts give commensurate changes in Signal and Background, • but give smoother background distributions. • Slight exception: Mt-> ±20 • appears to win a little S/B..(S:22542033 ; B:196156) • loses smoothness in ttjj shape terms (statistical?) (a) CSC (b) btag4.5. (ttjj +larger) (c) bthreshold off (d) LightJets wt+1.0 (e) Wlep rescale off (f) Mt ±20 GeV (g) MWlep±25 GeV

  8. Distributions/Significances • CSC Distributions • ..Ugly…… • S=1.8 • S/B=0.11 • Distribution (e) • Smoother….. • peaks all in same place • s=1.61 • S/B=0.07 • Distribution (g) rebinned putting Mh=120 not at bin-edge • Compromise..? • s=1.64 • S/B=0.09

  9. Effect on truth-matching • For quarks having • Pt> QuarkPtThreshold (2 GeV) • Matched to a jet within DR<QuarkDeltaRCut (0.5) • To be included, events had to have a reconstructed ttbar combination (inside mass windows).

  10. Effect on truth-matching • For quarks having • Pt> QuarkPtThreshold (2 GeV) • Matched to a jet within DR<QuarkDeltaRCut (0.5) • To be included, events had to have a reconstructed ttbar combination (inside mass windows). • NB: sometimes up to 6 light quarks come from WHad in the truth record; • jet matching to these simply asks if the jet we used to reconstruct WHad was associated with a quark/quarks coming from Truth WHad.. • Reconstructed WHad only have 2 jet constituents.

  11. Effect on truth-matching • For quarks having • Pt> QuarkPtThreshold (2 GeV) • Matched to a jet within DR<QuarkDeltaRCut (0.5) • To be included, events had to have a reconstructed ttbar combination (inside mass windows). • NB: sometimes up to 6 light quarks come from WHad in the truth record; • jet matching to these simply asks if the jet we used to reconstruct WHad was associated with a quark/quarks coming from Truth WHad.. • Reconstructed WHad only have 2 jet constituents. • NB: a reco jet used as (say) btLep might be associated with truth btLep; but also might be associated with a truth btHad or bHiggs…or a quark from WHad. • To get over this: if the reconstructed item is associated to the truth item it’s counted as ‘correct’.

  12. Effect on truth-matching • For quarks having • Pt> QuarkPtThreshold (2 GeV) • Matched to a jet within DR<QuarkDeltaRCut (0.5) • To be included, events had to have a reconstructed ttbar combination (inside mass windows). • NB: sometimes up to 6 light quarks come from WHad in the truth record; • jet matching to these simply asks if the jet we used to reconstruct WHad was associated with a quark/quarks coming from Truth WHad.. • Reconstructed WHad only have 2 jet constituents. • NB: a reco jet used as (say) btLep might be associated with truth btLep; but also might be associated with a truth btHad or bHiggs…or a quark from WHad. • To get over this: if the reconstructed item is associated to the truth item it’s counted as ‘correct’. • Another problem (I have not solved!) is what to do when a jet is used in a particle, but it does not match the truth record for that particle (happens often).. • Then if there are two possible truth matches for that jet (say HiggsB and a LightQuark..) • What do we say it ‘really’ came from? The closer of the two? This will skew the plots..at the moment it depends on the order of my ‘if’ statements!

  13. Effect on truth-matching • For quarks having • Pt> QuarkPtThreshold (2 GeV) • Matched to a jet within DR<QuarkDeltaRCut (0.5) • To be included, events had to have a reconstructed ttbar combination (inside mass windows). • NB: sometimes up to 6 light quarks come from WHad in the truth record; • jet matching to these simply asks if the jet we used to reconstruct WHad was associated with a quark/quarks coming from Truth WHad.. • Reconstructed WHad only have 2 jet constituents. • NB: a reco jet used as (say) btLep might be associated with truth btLep; but also might be associated with a truth btHad or bHiggs…or a quark from WHad. • To get over this: if the reconstructed item is associated to the truth item it’s counted as ‘correct’. • Another problem (I have not solved!) is what to do when a jet is used in a particle, but it does not match the truth record for that particle (happens often).. • Then if there are two possible truth matches for that jet (say HiggsB and a LightQuark..) • What do we say it ‘really’ came from? The closer of the two? This will skew the plots..at the moment it depends on the order of my ‘if’ statements! • Uses?: Could look into events where we got combination right but didn’t make a Higgs; can we relax b-weight restriction for bb(H)???

  14. CSC Signal truth assignments • Large number of Higgs b-jets end up reconstructed in tLep or tHad • Worst reconstruction efficiency in building btHad • Slightly different to those produced by Georges Aad, but pretty similar • Differences could be due to matching criteria • The results are close enough for me.. Jet came from Unkn WHad Unkn tHad Unkn WHad WHad WHad tLep Unkn tHad tLep tHad tHad tLep tLep H H H H Jet used as btLep Jet used as btHad Jet used as bHiggs Jet used as jWHad Jet used as

  15. Effect of changes (a)..(g).. small! Jet used as bHiggs Jet used as btLep Jet used as btHad Jet used as jWHad (a) ttjj CSC tl th H W tl tl tl X th H W th H W th H W X X X (b) btag4.5. (c) bthreshold off (d) LightJets wt+1.0 (e) Wlep rescale off (f) Mt ±20 GeV (g) MWlep±25 GeV

  16. Effect of changes (a)..(g).. small! Jet used as bHiggs Jet used as btLep Jet used as btHad Jet used as jWHad (a) ttjj CSC tl th H W tl tl tl X th H W th H W th H W X X X (b) btag4.5. (c) bthreshold off (d) LightJets wt+1.0 (e) Wlep rescale off (f) Mt ±20 GeV (g) MWlep±25 GeV

  17. Future studies • Future: would like to look at background truth-assignments • Might be able to tell where the (fake) Higgs-b’s are coming from! • Many further things I now intend to look at.. • Jet Algorithms (Kt4 would be easy to try.. Did some work a while ago checking that b-tagging was OK to use for Kt..) • Relaxing Btag cut for Higgs b’s (after ttbar reconstructed) • Using Highest Pt top as opposed to best chi-squared top.. • might help with Higgs-b’s getting into tops • Also look at further strategies for background measurement from data… • Getting smooth distributions is only one!

More Related