1 / 24

PM Monitoring

PM Monitoring. Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe. Overview of PM session:. Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting QC (routine checks, audits, and method-specific QC) for: Filter and Continuous PM2.5 Filter and Continuous PM10 Minivols

ramya
Télécharger la présentation

PM Monitoring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PM Monitoring Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe

  2. Overview of PM session: • Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting • QC (routine checks, audits, and method-specific QC) for: • Filter and Continuous PM2.5 • Filter and Continuous PM10 • Minivols • General PM QC issues

  3. FRM=Federal Reference MethodFEM = Federal Equivalent Methodnew list available as of 2/1: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/criteria/reference-equivalent-methods-list.pdf

  4. For NAAQS • If comparing to standard, MUST use FRM or FEM; see 40 CFR 50.7 • Also look at Appendix C to 40 CFR Part 58 – Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology • You may have purposes other than comparing to NAAQS, and you may want different types of instruments to suit your goals • Can use an FRM (class 1, filter-based), FEM class II (filter-based, like dichots), or FEM class III (continuous), or ARM (someday)

  5. §50.7   NAAQS for Particulate Matter 2.5 Microns and Smaller • 6 PM2.5 continuous methods have been approved as FEMs • PM2.5 Continuous Monitoring http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/contmont.html • If PM2.5 continuous FEMs meet Part 53 criteria used to approve the instrument by comparing to collocated FRMs, EPA supports use of the continuous FEM as a Primary monitor (see spreadsheet for the calcs at above website)

  6. Approved PM2.5 Class III FEMs • Met One BAM-1020 Monitor – EQPM-0308-170 • Thermo Scientific Model 5014i or FH62C14-DHS – EQPM-0609-183 • Thermo Scientific Model 5030 SHARP – EQPM-0609-184 • Thermo Scientific Series 8500C FDMS – EQPM-0609-181 • Thermo Scientific 1405-DF FDMS – EQPM-0609-182 • GRIMM Model EDM 180 PM2.5 Monitor – EQPM-0311-195

  7. Summary of Operating PM2.5 FEMs:

  8. ARMs ? • ARM = Approved Regional Method • No ARMs yet • Process of establishing an ARM is the same as an FEM, must collocate FRM and produce 90 + sample pairs per year with 20 ea season • Regional office must approve (natch)

  9. 3 scenarios for PM2.5 continuous for NAAQS: • An approved FEM can be designated as primary • The FEM can be collocated with FRM, the FRM being primary • An ARM FEM can be approved (takes at least a year of operation to gather enough data, plus time for approval) • Approved primary FEM or ARM would then report to AQS as 88101, POC 3

  10. PM 2.5 QC Overview: • See e-cfr, or: http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl

  11. Who can do these, and with what? General info on filter methods in guidance doc 2.12: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/qa/m212covd.pdf

  12. PM2.5: • Same CFR requirements for filter (FRM-17 methods) and dichot (2 methods) and continuous (6 methods), although there are separate validation templates for filter, continuous & dichot • collocation: • if <= 3 sites, at least 1 FRM collocated with one FEM • 1/12 days for SLAMS, 1/6 for PSD • PEP five times each year if fewer than 5 sites • FR checks every 4 weeks(RP) with own stnd • FR audit every 6 months(RA) with outside stnd

  13. §50.7   NAAQS for Particulate Matter 10 Microns and Smaller • FRM are all filter-based methods (40 CFR 50 App. J) • FEM includes continuous methods (40 CFR 53) • BOTH can be compared to the NAAQS for PM10 (40 CFR 50.7)

  14. PM10 FRM: 2 Methods • Hi-vol (1130 lpm) method (used for TSP) with PM10 inlet that directs only PM10 to filter; guidance in EPA Handbook 2.11 • Lo-vol sampling at 16.7 L/m; see EPA Handbook 2.10; can be either: • Dichot method which split into PM2.5 and PM10; both filters are weighed • Lo-vol sampler (R&P, Andersen, and BGI all approved as FRM PM10) Both handbooks at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/qapollutant.html

  15. PM10 FEM: 2 Methods • TEOMs • BAMs

  16. PM 10 manual QC: (hi-vol or lo-vol doesn’t matter to the 15%)

  17. PM 10 automated QC: Plus whatever your instrument manuals call for.

  18. Who can do these, and with what?

  19. Minivols: • As for all PM, it all hinges on flow rate and careful filter handling

  20. General PM QC issues: • Laboratories! • The TAMS Center laboratory provides exemplary reports; examples available for you to urge your lab to copy (see COC forms in zipped folder) • Also ask for quarterly QC reports • TAMS gravimetric services: http://www4.nau.edu/tams/services/filterlab.asp • Flow rate standards must be verified annually, some guidance in Redbook http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/qapollutant.html • Data management (filters require chain of custody; see example COC forms for PEP program in session 7 folder)

  21. More PM issues: • You may be using a non-FRM/FEM, so you can report to AQS using the non-regulatory guidance: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/memos/Non%20Regulatory%20Monitor%20Type%20Guidance.pdf • Flow rate and pressure calcs are made easier with free program: http://www.unitconverterpro.com/ • REPORT NEGATIVE VALUES: see your MDL in the table AQS_SplgMethodsFromToolbox.xls in session 7 folder: • TEOMs MDL ranges from -10 to -50 • BAMS MDL ranges from -10 to 4 mg/m3

  22. QC forms specific to your instrument are available in EPA draft SOPs in course downloads folder:

  23. Use resources available:

  24. PM Monitoring Conclusions: • It ALL hangs on flow rate • PM2.5 PEP auditing necessary for NAAQS data • Your instrument may be able to do “better” than validation criteria, see your spec sheets

More Related