1 / 23

Low-Power Color TFT LCD Display for Hand-Held Embedded Systems

Low-Power Color TFT LCD Display for Hand-Held Embedded Systems. Jamie Unger-Fink John David Eriksen. Outline. Intro to LCDs Power Issues Energy Model New Reduction Techniques Results Conclusion. LCD Intro. STN vs TFT Large power consumer even in high-performance embedded systems.

randi
Télécharger la présentation

Low-Power Color TFT LCD Display for Hand-Held Embedded Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Low-Power Color TFT LCD Display for Hand-Held Embedded Systems Jamie Unger-Fink John David Eriksen

  2. Outline • Intro to LCDs • Power Issues • Energy Model • New Reduction Techniques • Results • Conclusion

  3. LCD Intro • STN vs TFT • Large power consumer even in high-performance embedded systems

  4. Why so much power? • Hand-held embedded systems usually execute interactive programs • Lots of slack time, dynamic power management can save CPU and memory access power • Shutting down LCD or turning off backlight results in unacceptable quality degradation • Display cannot ‘sleep’, so how do we reduce power here? • Need new energy reduction techniques

  5. System Energy Model • Display System • LCD Controller • Frame Buffer • LCD panel & bus • LCD backlight • Inverter

  6. System-level Approach • Must utilize detailed energy consumption characteristics • System-level simulator • Locate major energy consuming components • Minor quality loss but no major degradation • Compare CPU/memory power consumption to display consumption

  7. Reference Platform • 32 bit RISC CPU @ 206 MHz • 32 bit 64MB SDRAM @ 66MHz • 8KB 2-way-set-associative data and instruction caches

  8. Reference Platform CPU and main memory • (4) Samsung SDRAM, 2” bus length, 2.7 pF capacitance • Fairchild buffer, 4 pF capacitance • Bus-hold circuit, 0.5 pF capacitance • SDRAM data ports, 5.3 pF capacitance • Buffer for memory address bus, 4.0 pF capacitance • Address port input, 15 pF capacitance

  9. Reference Platform • LCD controller and frame buffer memory • 32 bit frame buffer • Controller implemented in Xilinx Spartan II • Xpower estimate: 136.7 mW @ 2.5V core voltage, 3.3V I/O voltage, 66MHz, 10 pF load • LCD panel and bus • 640 x 480, 6.4”, 18-bit transmissive color TFT LCD (VGA) • LCD backlight and inverter • CCFT backlight tube, 12V supply inverter

  10. LCD Power Consumption • Power Consumption per color • Power consumption at pixel clock freq 25MHz

  11. Energy Consumption • Example: MPEG4 player

  12. New Energy Reduction Techniques • Variable-duty-ratio refresh • Dynamic-color-depth control • Brightness compensation with backlight dimming • Contrast enhancement with backlight dimming

  13. Variable-duty-ratio refresh • CRT compatible interface • Can exploit CRT/LCD differences to save power • Variable-duty-ratio implemented with DTMG • Reduce to 50% duty with no flicker

  14. LCD sub-pixel circuit • Two capacitive components, CLC an CST • CST needs to be refreshed • For TFT LCD, if refresh rate is higher than CST time constant, no flicker at all • Don’t need a high rate like 120 Hz

  15. Dynamic-color-depth control • Modify pixel organization to reduce color depth when appropriate • CPU independent

  16. Dynamic-color-depth control • During rendering, CPU draws image in full depth • During sweeping, LCD controller adjusts the color depth to save energy • Can shut down 8 LSB when we use 8-bit depth • Application dependent energy gain • MPEG4 player – 315.7 mW • MP3 player – 250 mW • Image viewer – 253 mW • Document viewer – 251.8 mW • Text editor – 250.1 mW

  17. Backlight dimming techniques • Brightness compensation • Contrast enhancement

  18. Brightness compensation • When you dim the backlight, you decrease the luminance • Need to compensate by increasing brightness, as long as number of saturated pixels is small I = ρLY I – Perceived Intensity ρ – LCD transmittance L – Backlight Luminance Y – Image Luminance

  19. Contrast enhancement • If too many saturated pixels in image, contrast enhancement may be used • Will not work if there is a continuous color spectrum • Can dim the backlight more aggressively than with Brightness compensation

  20. Results • By using the new techniques outlined in the paper, energy consumption can be reduced by 15% to 27% • MPEG4 player: 320x240 pixels, 30Hz fram rate • MP3 player: 100x50 pixel user interface, 1Hz • Image viewer: 640 x 480, updates every 3 s • Document viewer: 640 x 480, new page every 5 s • Text editor: updates 3 new characters per second

  21. Results • Application Specific Parameters • Aggregate Power Reduction

  22. Conclusion • New low power techniques • Minimal quality loss • As hand-held devices become smaller, low power displays become more important • Battery life • Heat dissipation • Average power consumption savings: 25%

  23. Questions?

More Related