1 / 25

Project Planning and Progress

Project Planning and Progress. Michelle Page | Design Build Engineer. August 2, 2011. Project Need. EIS initiated in 2004 Utah County annual growth rate of 5.5% Projected 2030 Utah County population: 907,210 (a 22-year growth rate of 75%) Aging infrastructure 40+ years old.

read
Télécharger la présentation

Project Planning and Progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project Planning and Progress Michelle Page | Design Build Engineer August 2, 2011

  2. Project Need • EIS initiated in 2004 • Utah County annual growth rate of 5.5% • Projected 2030 Utah County population: 907,210 (a 22-year growth rate of 75%) • Aging infrastructure 40+ years old

  3. Project Funding • EIS from 12300 South to South Payson completed August 2008 • 43-mile corridor estimated cost $5 billion • 2009 Legislature allocated $1.725 billion • Motto 1: Be Flexible • Motto 2: Stretch south

  4. Fixed-Price, Best-Design Approach Bidders develop highest-value, creative solution for fixed construction budget Proposals evaluated on meeting or exceeding defined criteria, based on project goals Fosters competition, innovation Best opportunity to achieve the most length, greatest number of improvements for set price

  5. Deliver I-15 CORE within the Budget Minimize Inconvenience to the Public Complete I-15 CORE by 2014 Provide the Highest Value for the Budget Uphold the Public Trust Project Goals Project goals and values approved by Transportation Commission:

  6. Fixed-Price Procurement Process More information at udot.utah.gov

  7. Procurement Schedule Released RFQ: April 2009 Design-builders submitted SOQs: May 2009 Short listed design-builders: May 2009 Commission endorsed values statement: May 2009 Issued RFP: June 2009 Conducted industry outreach and technical proposal discussions: June – October 2009 Design-builders submitted proposals: November 19, 2009 Announced selected design builder: December 9, 2009 Issued NTP1: January 14, 2010 Issued NTP2: April 19, 2010

  8. Selected Design-Build Team Provo River Constructors: • Fluor Enterprises • Ames Construction Company • Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company • Wadsworth Brothers Construction Company • Fluor/HDR Global Design Consultants • Michael Baker Jr. • Jacobs Engineering Group • H.W. Lochner • Kleinfelder West • Intermountain GeoEnvironmental Services • CRS Consulting Engineers • Raba-Kistner Consultants • TransCore IP • Stillwell & Associates • Applied Research Associates • Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants • Psomas • CME Transportation Group

  9. Final Project Scope Subject to change

  10. Progress Update • Project design completed • Project approximately 50% complete • On schedule for December 2012 completion • Approximately $2 million of work every day during peak construction

  11. Materials • 5 million tons of fill placed • 30 miles of pipeline laid

  12. Concrete Paving • 1 million square yards of concrete placed to date • 2.7 million total for the project • Can place 10,000-15,000 square yards per day

  13. Bridges • 3 reconstructed bridges open to traffic • 35 bridges currently under construction

  14. Sam White Bridge Move

  15. Labor • 3.2 million work-hours to date • Current crew, staff and management: 1,500

  16. Phase-One Traffic Configuration

  17. Phase-Two Configuration

  18. Head-to-Head Configuration, Phase One

  19. Quality Program • Design-Builder’s Role • Quality Control • Quality Assurance • UDOT’s Role • Quality Oversight • Independent Assurance Role • Certification and testing

  20. Public Involvement Approach • Owner responsible for all public communication and outreach • Team includes managers dedicated to media, social media, elected officials, and geographic project segments • Owner controls messaging and communication strategy • Design-builder responsible to provide accurate, up-to-date information to PI team

  21. Keeping the Public Informed

  22. Annual Survey

  23. Annual Survey

  24. For More Information • E-mail: i15core@utah.gov • Website: udot.utah.gov/i15core • Hotline: 1-888-i15core • Text messaging: text "i15" to 53535 • Facebook: facebook.com/i15core • Twitter: twitter.com/i15core • Weekly e-mail updates: sign up at udot.utah.gov/i15core

  25. Questions

More Related