1 / 15

Technology stic

SWOTT Presentation April 8, 2011. Technology stic. our fanta STIC team. Technology Coordinating Team (TCT) – Jon Storslee Direct Instructional Liaisons (DIL) – Patti Marsh Online Learning Committee (OLC) – Jim Patterson Center for Distance Learning (CDL) – Sheri Bakunowski

reba
Télécharger la présentation

Technology stic

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SWOTT Presentation April 8, 2011 Technology stic

  2. our fantaSTIC team • Technology Coordinating Team (TCT) – Jon Storslee • Direct Instructional Liaisons (DIL) – Patti Marsh • Online Learning Committee (OLC) – Jim Patterson • Center for Distance Learning (CDL) – Sheri Bakunowski • Web Advisory Committee (WAC) – Mary Lou Mosley and PaulGolisch

  3. Mission and Role MISSION: The purpose of the Technology STIC is to develop and communicate a comprehensive SWOTT analysis summarizing environmental and organizational factors that impact the quality and direction of technology use, integration, innovation, collaboration, and support at PVCC. ROLE: The team will focus on internal and external trends through a comprehensive environmental scan. Internal factors will be monitored with effective and meaningful institutional data as well as feedback and input from stakeholders.

  4. STRENGTHS – common themes • Competent, centralized IT staff • Outstanding support for faculty and students • Excellent collaboration and communication among faculty and IT staff (e.g. OHCS) • Technology enhanced environment (in and out of the classroom) • Solid processes in place from proposal => implementation => training => maintenance • Systematic planning and budgeting

  5. STRENGTHS - others • Center for Teaching & Learning (CTL) has a talented team in a comprehensive new facility • Center for Distance Learning (CDL) supports distance learning Choices • Many online and hybrid courses are archived • Planned expansion of distance courses • Increasing support and training for faculty, including opportunities designed for adjunct faculty.

  6. WEAKNESSES– common themes • Number of IT staff has not kept pace with the increasing number of students as well as expanded facilities and use of technology • Funding is limited for software, training, etc. • Minimal incentives for adjunct faculty to participate in training and integrate technology in their courses • Inconsistent communication with adjunct faculty regarding technology resources at PVCC

  7. WEAKNESSES - others • Reliance on Bond funds • Student confusion • Choices - what are they? • Assistance – where can they get help? • Skills - lack of student understanding of expectations • Distance Learning has limited support and role at PVCC • Student completion and attrition rates for distance learning courses are a challenge • Only a small number of qualified distance learning proposals have been submitted lately (see next slide)

  8. Approved Online and Hybrid Course Proposals

  9. OPPORTUNITIES – common themes • MCCCD Technology Plan – One Maricopa • Open Educational Resources (OER) • Grant money, partnerships • New technologies – virtual classrooms, mobile devices, virtualized applications, etc. • Increased articulation with universities • High school graduates more comfortable with technology (online classes, Google Docs, social media) • Increasing tuition at universities

  10. OPPORTUNITIES - others • Learning Management System RFP • External contracts such as Navy Online • Expanding use of technology by faculty

  11. THREATS – common themes • Reduced funding • Competition from other colleges and universities • Quality adjunct instructors are difficult to find and retain • Potential standardization across MCCCD

  12. THREATS - others • Rapidly changing technologies have higher requirements -- bandwidth, expertise, etc • Blackboard issues • More opportunities for IT staff to leave the college as the economy improves

  13. TRENDS • Mobile computing • Open Educational Resources • Virtual classrooms • Virtual applications (e.g. MySCC) • Increasing demand for online courses • Increasing familiarity with online courses • Reliance on technology to decrease the need for staff

  14. FIVE WAYS TO SPEND $10 MILLION • Life without Bond • Fund faculty to develop and integrate technology into their instruction -- such as Open Educational Resources (OER), iPads, eBooks, mobile devices, etc. • Fund the development and support of enough online and hybrid courses to meet the demand • Provide financial rewards for innovations that are collaboratively developed and increase student success • Bonuses for Technology STIC members (just wondered if you were still reading this …)

  15. QUESTIONS?? THANK YOU

More Related