100 likes | 225 Vues
To what extent does non- verbal language contribute more to our knowledge than verbal language?. Area of knowledge –Latin Way of knowing - reason. For.
E N D
To what extent does non- verbal language contribute more to our knowledge than verbal language?
Area of knowledge –Latin Way of knowing - reason For Now the small band of Monases and Parcrous crashed our non approved attack twice and it beams that it has thrown spoils to their cheap necklaces. Dacians and Aethopians nearly destroyed our city, busy by rebellion. The later feared for fleets, the others better for throwing arrows. Iam bis Monaeses et Pacori manusnon auspicatos contudit impetus nostros et adiecisse praedamtorquibus exiguis renidet.Paene occupatam seditionibusdeleuit urbem Dacus et Aethiops,hic classe formidatus, ille missilibus melior sagittis. Non his iuuentus orta parentibusinfecit aequor sanguine PunicoPyrrhumque et ingentem cecidit Antiochum Hannibalemque dirum The young men who did not stain the Punic sea with the blood were born of this parentage, Those who did not fell Pyrrhus, and powerful Antiochus, and fearful Hannibal.
Area of knowledge – History Way of knowing - reason For and Against Stasi – East Germany secret police
Area of knowledge –technology/sport Way of knowing - reason Against Knower's perspective
Area of knowledge –Human sciences Way of knowing –emotion/language To what extent does the media blind our knowledge? For– RLS and Titanic
Area of knowledge –History Way of knowing – perception/ emotion Against Knower's perspective
Area of knowledge –Science Way of knowing –emotion/language For- new scientist
Bibliography • Newspapers • New Scientist • Latin anthology • http://www.middle-ages.org.uk/the-childrens-crusade.htm • http://www.newscientist.com/subs/offer?pg=bdlecpyhvyhuk1202&prom=1234&cmpid=PSC|NSNS|SUBS-2012-UK-adwd-magazine&gclid=CLzDobu-17ACFcQKfAod2Hg6zA