140 likes | 293 Vues
This document evaluates the REMHALA Pilot Project for natural wastewater treatment conducted in Lebanon from 2009 to 2011. It highlights the project's objectives, methodologies, and outcomes, showing its effectiveness in treating wastewater with low investment and maintenance costs. The project emphasizes the importance of municipal cooperation and scientific research in environmental management. Results indicate successful integration of the treatment system with natural processes, despite some limitations related to hydraulic load and solid treatment issues. Insights from this project are essential for future implementations.
E N D
NATURAL • Waste Water Treatment REMHALA • MoUnt OF Lebanon 2009-2011 P 01 Pilot Project - Evaluation Experience – Results • PROJECT LEBANON 2013 - EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5 - 6 JUNe 2013
INTRODUCTION • Creation of Project • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 • Prior Project – Prior NEEDS • Municipal Cooperation • PILOT PROJECT: • Creativity • Development • Evaluation • Experiences – Results Crativite Developpement Evaluation P 02
PRINCIPLES • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 • NaturalProject • Micro Procession • Reasonable Cost for Investment • less Cost for Maintenance • Development of Concepts and practice • Large Domain for Scientific Research P 03
REMHALA • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 • ITALIAN Project • Practical Application • Practical Influence: • Lebanese Decision • Adaptation of Projects… • Research Progress • Domain of Works P 04
REMHALA - PHOTOS • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 AFTER • 2012 BEFORE • 2010 P 05
PROTO TYPE – PHOTOS 1 • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 P 06
PROTO TYPE – PHOTOS 2 • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 P 06
SYNTHESE – ADVANTAGES • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 • Good Performance in treatment for the Particulars • Parameters (Carbon - C & Azote - NK) • Treatment for all Waste Water • Possibility to InfiltratetreatWater in the soil • Good Adaptation With Wethers variations • Facilitate the Management of solide Components • Very LowInvestmentCost • VeryAdvantageCost for Maintenance and • Working (No energeticNeeds) • Very Good Natural Intégration P 07
SYNTHESE – INCONVENIENTS • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 • Less Adaptation to HydraulicLoad • Lesslevel for AzotTreatment (Absence of • dénitrification) and Phosphore • Risk to infiltrateBigQuantity in Soil • Less in experience about Solide TreatmentIassue • Continious Use, Annual Agriculture treatments • RiskPresence of Insects and Rodents P 08
MEDIA • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 • Developed Research • Internationale Cooperation • Specificity for Each Project • Diversity in Model Concept… • Scientific DECISION • Very Good Final Product… P 09
Practice SIMULATION • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 P 10
RESULTS • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 • LEBANESE STRATEGY • Master PLAN • ENCOURAGEMENT… • ENVIRONNEMENT… • ZERO POWER… • DECENTRALISATION … P 11
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS • EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5- 6 JUNE 2013 • THANK YOU • THANK YOU • THANK YOU • THANK YOU • THANK YOU • PROJECT LEBANON 2013 - EcOrient 2013 Eng. Rached SARKIS • 5 - 6 JUNE 2013 • rjs@rachedsarkis.com P 12