SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Affymetrix Data Pre-processing: Probe-level Analysis Methods

reesep avatar
14 diapositives · 174 Views · Jan 06, 2020

Learn about calculating expression values for gene probes and choosing between MAS 4, MAS 5, RMA, and GC-RMA methods for Affymetrix data pre-processing. Understand background correction, normalization techniques, and the application of MEDIAN POLISH for robust analysis.

Affymetrix Data Pre-processing: Probe-level Analysis Methods - slide 1
01 / 14Affymetrix Data Pre-processing: Probe-level Analysis Methods
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Affymetrix Data Pre-processing: Probe-level Analysis Methods
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Lecture Topic 5 Pre-processing AFFY data

  2. Probe Level Analysis • The Purpose • Calculate an expression value for each probe set (gene) from the 11-25 PM and MM intensities • Critical for later analysis. Avoiding GIGO

  3. Difficulties • Large variability • Few measurements (11-25) at most • MM is very complex, it is signal plus background • Signal has to be SCALED • Probe-level effects

  4. Different Methods • MAS 4 Affymetrix 1996 • MAS 5 Affymetrix 2002 • Robust Multichip Analysis (RMA) 2002 • GC-RMA 2004

  5. MAS 4 A- probe pairs selected

  6. Avg Diff • Calculated using differences between MM and PM of every probe pair and averaging over the probe pair • Excluded OUTLIER pairs if PM-MM > 3 SD • Was NOT a robust average • NOT log-transformed • COULD be negative (about 1/3 of the times)

  7. MAS 5 • Signal=TukeyBiweight{log2(PMj-IMj) • Discussed this earlier. • Requires calculating IM • Adjusted PM-MM are log transformed and robust for outlying observations using Tukey Biweight.

  8. Robust Multichip Analysis ONLY uses PM and ignores MM SACRIFICES Accuracy but major gains in PRECISION • Basic Steps: • 1. Calculate chip background (*BG) and subtract from PM • 2. Carry out intensity dependent normalization for PM-*BG • Lowess • Quantile Normalization (Discussed before) • Normalized PM-*BG are log transformed • Robust multichip analysis of all probes in the set and using Tukey median polishing procedure. Signal is antilog of result.

  9. RMA- Step 1: Background Correction • Irrizary et al(2003) • Looks at finding the conditional expectation of the TRUE signal given the observed signal (which is assumed to be the true signal plus noise) • E(si | si+bi) • Here, si assumed to follow Exponential distribution with parameter q. • Bi assumed to follow N(me, s2e) • Estimate me and se as the mean and standard deviation of empty spots

  10. RMA- BG Corrected Value

  11. RMA-Normalization Use the background corrected intensities B(PM) to carry out normalization • Lowess (for Spatial effects) • Quantile Normalization (to allow comparability amongst replicate slides) • Normalized B(PM) are log transformed

  12. RMA summarization • Use MEDIAN POLISH to fit a linear model • Given a MATRIX of data: • Data= overall effects+row effects + column effects + residual • Find row and column effects by subtracting the medians of row and column successively till all the medians are less than some epsilon • Gives estimated row, column and overall effect when done

  13. Median Polish of RMA • For each probe set we have a matrix (probes in rows and arrays in columns) • We assume: • Signal=probe affinity effect + logscale for expression + error • Also assume the sum of probe affinities is 0 • Use MEDIAN polish to estimate the expression level in each array