1 / 20

Preliminary Simulation of the Regional Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Model in the Southern California Coastal Regions (Santa

Preliminary Simulation of the Regional Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Model in the Southern California Coastal Regions (Santa Ana Winds and Air-Sea Interaction). Hyodae Seo, Art Miller, John Roads Scripps Institution of Oceanography UCSD, 0224 La Jolla, CA 92093 5 th International RSM workshop

reid
Télécharger la présentation

Preliminary Simulation of the Regional Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Model in the Southern California Coastal Regions (Santa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Preliminary Simulation of the Regional Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Model in the Southern California Coastal Regions(Santa Ana Winds and Air-Sea Interaction) Hyodae Seo, Art Miller, John Roads Scripps Institution of Oceanography UCSD, 0224 La Jolla, CA 92093 5th International RSM workshop Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea July 12-16, 2004

  2. Outline • What is the Santa Ana? : Observational evidence • Numerical Simulations: : Oceanic and atmospheric response (coupled and uncoupled simulations) • Conclusions/Ongoing work

  3. The Santa Ana: Devil’s breath • Interaction with topography • Dry and warm due to adiabatic heating • Wildfires • Clearing of marine stratiform clouds • Dust/Aerosols transport to the ocean

  4. RSM simulation: Feb. 7 ~ 16, 2002 U10m(m/s) In San Diego V10m(m/s) 3 hourly Daily averaged Santa Ana Episode FWI(%) RH2m(%)

  5. 925mb winds(m/s) and FWI(%) Increased likelihood of wildland fires Feb 8 3Z ~ Feb 13Z 2002

  6. 850mb winds(m/s) and Low Level Cloudiness(%) • Large scale clearing of low-level marine layer clouds Feb 8 3Z ~ Feb 13Z 2002

  7. Forcing from RSM(1): zonal windstress(N/m2) Climatology forcing Santa Ana Forcing difference FAR OFFSHORE SCB

  8. Forcing from RSM(2): surface net heatflux (W/m2) difference Santa Ana Forcing Climatology forcing FAR OFFSHORE SCB

  9. Atmosphere and Ocean Model and their Exchange of Forcing ATMOSPHERE ECPC’ RSM: 20km resolution Momentum flux, Net surface heat, freshwater flux : 3 hourly OCEAN The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) Primitive equation ocean model (Song and Haidvogel, 1994) Sigma vertical coordinate (enhanced res. near top and bathymetry) Curvilinear horizontal grid (~12km and ~5km resolution)

  10. Forcing from RSM: SHFLUX(W/m2) Shflux(W/m2) =swrad+lwrad-lhtfl-shtfl Heat-flux Correction: Q’=Q+dQdSST*(T_mod-SST) dQdSST~-40(W/m2/C)

  11. Oceanic Response(1): SST(C) response to Santa Ana response to climatology FAR OFFSHORE SCB

  12. Cross-shore Component Ekman Mass Transport(kg/s/m)Measure of Upwelling intensity response to Santa Ana response to climatology FAR OFFSHORE SCB

  13. Oceanic Response(2): Meridional surface current(V, m/s) response to Santa Ana response to climatology INLAND SCB FAR OFFSHORE

  14. Atmosphere and Ocean Model and their Exchange of Forcing Atmosphere: ECPC RSM: 20km resolution Momentum flux, Net surface heat, freshwater flux : 3 hourly SST: daily Ocean: The Regional Ocean Modeling System(ROMS) Primitive equation ocean model (Song and Haidvogel, 1994) Sigma vertical coordinate Curvilinear horizontal grid (~12km and ~5km resolution)

  15. Atmospheric Response(1): Zonal winds(U,m/s) @ 10m forced w/ OBS SST difference forced w/ ROMS SST

  16. Atmospheric Response(2): meridional winds(V, m/s) @ 10m forced w/ OBS SST difference forced w/ ROMS SST

  17. Atmospheric Response(3): surface net heatflux (W/m2) forced w/ OBS SST forced w/ ROMS SST difference

  18. FWI(%): RSM’s Response to ROMS SST vs Reanalysis SST forced w/ OBS SST forced w/ ROMS SST San Diego

  19. Conclusion/Ongoing work(1) • Both RSM and ROMS reproduce qualitatively well the atmospheric extreme and typical oceanic response in terms of spatial intensity and temporal evolution. • Oceanic response indicates that Santa Ana winds forcing modifies the Ekman dynamics of the ocean surface layer by decreasing upwelling, and thereby increasing SST. • ROMS could not resolve any small scale cold tongues and chlorophyll blooms adjacent to the coastlines.

  20. Conclusion/Ongoing Work(2) • Coupled RSM run with ROMS shows less intense Santa Ana event, mainly because the ocean surface from ROMS is warmer. • Higher Surface Heatflux (Stronger Winds) from RSM  Warmer SST from ROMS  lower Heatflux(weaker winds) from RSM ( and presumably colder SST from ROMS?): possibility of stable integration. • Coupled model requires higher resolution (up to 5km) and better description of coastlines in order to resolve the small scale and short-lived features. • Sensitivity of Southern California Current System to atmospheric forcing: Use of bulk parameterizations to provide feedback, implementation of 3D NPZD ecosystem model.

More Related