1 / 22

Multidisciplinary Modelling : Current status and expectations in the Dutch TWINS consortium

Multidisciplinary Modelling : Current status and expectations in the Dutch TWINS consortium. { F.P.M.Stappers , L.J.A.M.Somers , M.A.Reniers }@ tue.nl ICSSEA’08 Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications Paris , France, December 9, 2008. Motivation.

reya
Télécharger la présentation

Multidisciplinary Modelling : Current status and expectations in the Dutch TWINS consortium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Multidisciplinary Modelling: Current status and expectations in the Dutch TWINS consortium {F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers }@tue.nl ICSSEA’08 Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications Paris, France, December 9, 2008

  2. Motivation Growing number of SW-HW embedded machines Many disciplines, mono-disciplinary focus Shorter time to market, growing complexity, increasing product quality Problematic integration trajectory ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  3. ITEA TWINS Project Goals multidisciplinary modelling • Communication • Consistency • MDA/MBD/MDTE • Understand physics • Control synthesis • Verify models • … TWINS: Optimizing HW-SW Co-Design Flow for Software Intensive System Development ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  4. Partners ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  5. Approach for investigation topics Obtained by: Project requirement analysis Use case analysis Plenary meetings 5 topics: Testing Verification Simulation Model Driven development Multi-disciplinary development language ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  6. Current industrial practices • Design phase • Product Development • System Design • Decomposition • Integration phase • System verification phase • Observation • Simulation • Formal verification ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  7. Design Phase – Product Development V-model ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  8. Design Phase – Product Development CAFCR ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  9. Design Phase – Product Development V-model extensions Contribution to harmonization between disciplines Accessible, understandable, readable Manage track-and-trace development Hard to remove inconsistency Difficult to trace the precise progress ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  10. Design Phase –System Design Purpose: • Communication for stakeholders/engineers • Project management • Risk reduction • System correctness Requirement types: • Functional • Non-Functional ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  11. Design Phase – System Design Decomposition Mechanical Behaviour Design Software Design System Requirements Static Physical Design Electrotechnical Design ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  12. Design Phase – System Design Decomposition – System Requirements Problem Frames ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  13. Design Phase – System Design Decomposition – Mechanical Behaviour Designs Chi CB/DE ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  14. Design Phase – System Design Decomposition – Software Designs UML ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  15. Design Phase – System Design Decomposition – Static Physical Designs CAD ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  16. Design Phase – System Design Decomposition – ElectrotechnicalDesigns PCB Tools ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  17. Integration phase –Problems ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  18. Integration phase –Current approaches ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  19. System verification phase • System design level • Integration level • Realisation level ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  20. Technical Contribution ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  21. Results Tools depend on industrial field Tools have mono-disciplinary focus Tools are vendor locked Models used are non-formal Multi-disciplinary model can reduce test time Cohesion between partners methods ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

  22. Questions ICSSEA'08 - F.P.M.Stappers, L.J.A.M.Somers, M.A.Reniers

More Related