This document explores the fundamental principles governing charged surfaces, focusing on the thermally distributed cations that shield the surface potential. It emphasizes the integration of Poisson-Boltzmann equation solutions to analyze how charge density impacts effective surface potential. The text discusses key concepts such as Debye length, surface charge density, specific capacitance, and introduces the zeta potential, highlighting the importance of electrolyte concentration on the behavior of charged surfaces. A practical example illustrates the effects of perturbations on molecular potentials at electrodes.
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
Simeon-Denis Poisson 1781-1840 Surface Potentials Cation distribution has to account for all species, i Poisson-Boltzman equation Charge near electrode depends upon potential and is integrated over distance from surface - affects the effective surface potential Dielectric constant of solution Permitivity of free space
Simeon-Denis Poisson 1781-1840 Ludwig Boltzman 1844-1904 In the event we can not use a series approximation to solve the Poisson-Boltzman equation we get the following: Check as Compared to tanh By Bard
Example Problem A 10 mV perturbation is applied to an electrode surface bathed in 0.01 M NaCl. What potential does the outer edge of a Ru(bpy)33+ molecule feel? Debye length, x? Units are 1/cm Since the potential applied (10 mV) is less than 50 can use the simplified equation.
Radius of Ru The potential the Ru(bpy)33+ compound experiences is less than the 10 mV applied. This will affect the rate of the electron transfer event from the electrode to the molecule.
Surface Charge Density The surface charge distance is the integration over all the charge lined up at the surface of the electrode The full solution to this equation is: C is in mol/L
Yo + + + + + + + + + Charged Surface Y=0.36 Yo d X=1/k X=0 Can be modeled as a capacitor: d differential
For the full equation d d At 25oC, water Differential capacitance Ends with units of uF/cm2 Conc. Is in mol/L
Can be simplified if Specific Capacitance is the differential space charge per unit area/potential Specific Capacitance Independent of potential For small potentials
Henrik Jensen,David J. FermnandHubert H. Girault* Received 16th February 2001 , Accepted 3rd April 2001 Published on the Web 17th May 2001 Real differential capacitance plots appear to roll off instead of Steadily increasing with increased potential
+ + + + + + + + + O. Stern Noble prize 1943 Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand von Helmholtz 1821-1894 Yo Linear drop in potential first in the Helmholtz or Stern specifically adsorbed layer Exponential in the thermally equilibrated or diffuse layer Charged Surface X=0 x2 Cdiffuse CHelmholtz or Stern
For large applied potentials and/or for large salt concentrations 1. ions become compressed near the electrode surface to create a “Helmholtz” layer. 2. Need to consider the diffuse layer as beginning at the Helmholtz edge Capacitance Due to Helmholtz layer Capacitance due to diffuse layer
Deviation Is dependent upon The salt conc. The larger the “dip” For the lower The salt conc.
Create an excel problem And ask students to determine the smallest Amount of effect of an adsorbed layer
Experimental data does not Correspond that well to the Diffuse double layer double capacitor model (Bard and Faulkner 2nd Ed)
Siv K. SiandAndrew A. Gewirth* Fig. 5 Capacitance�potential curve for the Au(111)/25 mM KI in DMSO interface with time. Received 8th February 2001 , Accepted 20th April 2001 Published on the Web 1st June 2001 Model needs to be altered to account For the drop with large potentials
+ + + + + + + + + Introducing the Zeta Potential Imagine a flowing solution along this charged surface. Some of the charge will be carried away with the flowing solution. Yo Charged Surface
+ + + + + + + + + Introducing the Zeta Potential, given the symbo lz Yo Shear Plane Flowing solution Charged Surface Sometimes assumed zeta corresponds to Debye Length, but Not necessarily true Yzeta
Shear Plane can be talked about in two contexts + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Yo Shear Plane Charged Surface In either case if we “push” the solution along a plane we end up with charge separation which leads to potential Shear Plane Particle in motion
Streaming Potentials From the picture on preceding slide, if we shove the solution Away from the charged surface a charge separation develops = potential
Movement of a charged ion in an electric field Electrophoretic mobility The force from friction is equal to the electric driving force The frictional drag comes about because the migrating ion’s atmosphere is moving in the opposite direction, dragging solvent with it, the drag is related to the ion atmosphere
Drag Force Electric Force Direction of Movement Ion accelerates in electric field until the electric force is equal and opposite to the drag force = terminal velocity
At terminal velocity The mobility is the velocity normalized for the electric field:
Sir George Gabriel Stokes 1819-1903 Stokes-Einstein equation r = hydrodynamic radius (Stokes Law) Typical values of the electrophoretic mobility are small ions 5x10-8 m2V-1s-1 proteins 0.1-1x10-8 m2V-1s-1 Reiger p. 97
What controls the hydrodynamic radius? - the shear plane and ions around it Compare the two equations for electrophoretic mobility Where f is a shape term which is 2/3 for spherical particles