1 / 18

In Search of a Behavioral Measure of Experiential Avoidance

In Search of a Behavioral Measure of Experiential Avoidance. Charles A. Hayes Robert D. Zettle, Ph.D. Suzanne Gird, M.A. Angie Hardage-Bundy, M.A. . Purpose. Alternative Measure of Experiential Avoidance(EA) Paper-and-Pencil Measures assessing

roana
Télécharger la présentation

In Search of a Behavioral Measure of Experiential Avoidance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. In Search of a Behavioral Measure of Experiential Avoidance Charles A. Hayes Robert D. Zettle, Ph.D. Suzanne Gird, M.A. Angie Hardage-Bundy, M.A.

  2. Purpose • Alternative Measure of Experiential Avoidance(EA) • Paper-and-Pencil Measures assessing • EA: Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, AAQ-II • Distress Tolerance: Distress Tolerance Scale, DTS • Candidates for Behavioral Measures of Experiential Avoidance • Cold-pressor • Paced Visual Serial Addition Test, PVSAT • Breath-holding task

  3. Method • Participants • 120 total, Mean age 22.82(7.95), range 18-59

  4. Method Counter- balanced Counter-balanced

  5. Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, AAQ-II • α = .89 • Distress Tolerance Scale • 15-item, self-report • Survey questions • My feelings of distress or being upset are not acceptable. • When I feel distressed or upset, I must do something about it immediately. • 5-point Likert scale • α = .84 (Bond et al., 2011) (Simons & Gaher, 2005)

  6. (Zettle, et al., 2005)

  7. (Zettle, et al., 2005)

  8. 5 5 5 Score 10 10 10 (Fos, et al., 2000)

  9. # Rate • Score: Trial 1 3 s • 3 m ------------------------------------------------- • Score: Trial 2 2 s • 5 m --------------------------------- • Score: Trial 3 1 s • 10 m -------------- • Time: Trial 3 • 10 m max (Fos, et al., 2000)

  10. (Brown et al., 2005)

  11. Correlations • AAQ-II & DTS • r(118) = -.587, p < .001 • Order Effects • AAQ-II • t(118) = -.245, p = .016

  12. Two Overarching Questions • Did these measures correlate to the degree that was anticipated? • No • Why not?

  13. Thanks to the Contextual Behavioral Science Lab for all their help with this presentation!

  14. Any Questions? For a reference list, please contact Charles Hayes at Cahayes@wichita.edu

  15. Trial 3 8 7 6 5 4 2 3 1 Score 10 8 6 2 4 9 3 3 5

More Related