SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

ACsE Bargaining Report

rocco avatar
19 diapositives · 318 Views · Jul 30, 2014

The ACsE bargaining team is advocating for a one-year extension to the current FY2009 contract for FY2010. Key proposals include a minimum across-the-board salary increase of 3.5% or whatever non-union employees receive, whichever is greater. Additionally, a longevity increase is sought for employees with 2 or more years of service. The university's offer includes a multi-year contract with a 2.5% salary increase and a 5% longevity increase, which many consider unfair compared to the increases for non-union staff. The team believes fair compensation for experience is vital.

ACsE Bargaining Report - slide 1
01 / 19ACsE Bargaining Report
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

ACsE Bargaining Report
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. ACsE Bargaining Report An update to the General Membership

  2. ACsE Bargaining Report • For FY2010, the bargaining team is asking for a one-year extension of the current FY 2009 contract that should include: • At least a 3.5% across the board salary increase or whatever non-union employees get whichever is greater. • A longevity increase for employees in the SIUC system for 2 or more years.

  3. What they have offered • A multi-year contract • 2.5% across the board (FY2010) • .5% longevity (FY2010) • The non-union employees are getting 3.5% salary increases

  4. Is that fair? • Again the university wants to gives the lowest paid employees the lowest salary increases. • They want to lock us into a multi-year contract that may mean lower salary increases for several years. • We work as hard as the non-union employees but they offer us a full percentage point less. • We know you want the salary increase soon but do you want to settle for less than 3.5%? • We think we should still bargain for 3.5% and a longevity increase.

  5. Why do we want longevity? • The following charts show some examples of the salary ranges in ACsE classifications. • We believe that an employee who has worked 10, 15, 20, or more years should make a significantly higher salary than someone who started yesterday.

  6. For example: • A building service foreman with more than 25 years in service makes very little more than one with less than 5 years in services as this chart shows: • 25 years = $24.98 ($1.15 higher) • 10 years = $23.84 ($.01 higher) • less than 5 years = $23.83 • Shouldn’t the difference be greater?

  7. Building Service Foreman Range Chart:

  8. How about this one? • A clerk with one year in service is making more than a clerk with nearly 25 years in service:

  9. Some explanations: • Within-classification adjustments • Promotions • Move to new classification • These may explain some of the anomalies on the following charts but . . . • Shouldn’t someone who has worked for ten years make more than someone who starts today?

  10. Accountant I • Chart:

  11. Accountant II • Chart:

  12. Office Administrator • New to the bargaining unit

  13. Office Support Associate • Not so bad

  14. Chief Clerk • Chart:

  15. Office Manager • Chart:

  16. Admissions & Records Officer • Chart:

  17. Admission & Records Representative • Chart:

  18. Office Support Specialist • Chart:

  19. Account Technician II • Chart: