1 / 7

Simplified IPv6 Policy Draft 2010-7 Overview

The Simplified IPv6 Policy Draft 2010-7 introduces significant changes to IPv6 policy for organizations, allowing qualification for various prefix sizes: /48, /40, /32, /28, and /24, based on criteria such as multi-homing, host count, number of sites, and projected /48s. This draft is specific to the ARIN region, though similar policies exist in other RIRs. Discussions and assessments are ongoing, with community feedback reflecting support and inquiries about prefix reservations. For further details, visit the ARIN PPML discussion archive.

ronnie
Télécharger la présentation

Simplified IPv6 Policy Draft 2010-7 Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Simplified IPv6 policy Draft Policy 2010-7

  2. 2010-7 - History AC Shepherds: David Farmer Scott Leibrand

  3. 2010-7 – Summary(Simplified IPv6 policy) Significantly changes IPv6 policy Organizations would be allowed to qualify for one each of the following prefixes: /48, /40, /32, /28, and /24 Qualification for each prefix is based on specific requirements (multi-homing, host count, # of sites, and # of projected /48s) Each prefix is issued from a specific range

  4. 2010-7 – Status at other RIRs(Simplified IPv6 policy) Draft policy is unique to ARIN region. Other RIRs have IPv6 assignment and allocation policies that are similar to ARIN’s present policy

  5. 2010-7 – Staff Assessment • Assessment available: • Discussion Guide • http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2010-February/016710.html

  6. 2010-7 – PPML Discussion Earlier proposal discussion 3 posts by 3 People 2 in favor, 0 against “I support this policy.” “…does this piece of the policy allow me to reserve a portion of my /32 (eg. /44) for residential clients and SWIP the entire thing as a whole as 'Private Customer Block - XYZ Network' as opposed to SWIPing each individual /56 as private?”

  7. Simplified IPv6 policy Draft Policy 2010-7

More Related