1 / 28

Full Faculty 1.14.11

Full Faculty 1.14.11. EPIC. Resolution and Endorsement of Plan for Development of a Divisional Structure at MICA Job Description for Divisional Assoc. Dean vs . Dept Chair Financial Plan for Incremental Phase-In of Heads Resolution of Direction for Divisional Organization.

rosa
Télécharger la présentation

Full Faculty 1.14.11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Full Faculty 1.14.11

  2. EPIC Resolution and Endorsement of Plan for Development of a Divisional Structure at MICA • Job Description for Divisional Assoc. Dean vs. Dept Chair • Financial Plan for Incremental Phase-In of Heads • Resolution of Direction for Divisional Organization

  3. Undergraduate and Graduate Program Oversight

  4. Job Description of Associate Dean for a division vs. a department chair

  5. Financial plan for incremental phase-in of a Divisional Structure: Proposal for phase-in: Reduce to four divisions as a mid-range goal: • Foundation • Division Head 1 • Division Head 2 • Division Head 3

  6. Concept: • Associate Dean of a Division would be a 12 month administrative position with faculty status and an opportunity to teach at least one course. Associate Deans would report to current Dean of Undergraduate Programs and Faculty (perhaps with modified job title)

  7. Remuneration: Division Assoc. Dean salary • Rationale: Salary should be a minimum at $90,000.00

  8. Average Faculty Salary: $69,600.00 • Would nominally need $20,000.00 per Division Head + $22,500.00 in part time salaries (5 courses X $4,500.00)= $ 20,000.00 $ 22,500.00 $ 42,500.00 per Division Head

  9. Timeline/Sequence for Phase-In AY11: • Affirm concept of mid-range divisional structure. • Reminder- Foundation as a Division with Divisional Assoc. Dean in place. • Begin process of searching for and appointing Divisional Assoc. Dean in AY12

  10. Timeline/Sequence for Phase-In AY12: • Appoint one Division Head in addition to Foundation Head • This individual would have a modified job description, ie., would act as a general associate dean until a second Division was appointed. • Begin search for 3rd Division Head

  11. Timeline/Sequence for Phase-In AY13 (or as soon as possible): • Appoint 3rdDivisional Assoc. Dean .

  12. Divisional Organization • Value of a discipline based approach • Disciplines/Departments vs Majors • Alignment of Administrative Assistance, Academic Advising, Career Development w/Divisions

  13. Divisional Model re: App proposal • Foundation • Humanities • 2D Fine Arts • 3D Fine Arts • Design • Media

  14. Divisional Model re Roeder Proposal: • Foundation • Humanities • Time • Repro • 2D • 3D ( or Divisions by Preference) -Considerations of size

  15. Proposal for Phase-In Reduce to four divisions as a mid-range goal: • Foundation • Liberal Arts • Fine Arts • Design & Media

  16. AY11: Affirm concept of mid-range divisional structure. • Reminder- Foundation is a Division with leadership in place. • Begin process of searching for and appointing a Divisional Assoc. Dean in AY12

  17. AY12: Appoint one Associate Dean for a division in addition to Associate Dean for Foundation • Would be selected to serve as either Associate Dean of Design & Media or Fine Arts

  18. AY13 (or as soon as possible): • Appoint Associate Dean to whichever of the two divisions cited above is not covered (Design & Media or Fine Arts)

  19. Rationale 3 Divisional Associate Deans would be appointed by AY13 • Collectively, would oversee all of the undergraduate studio programs. • Liberal Arts would be last to appoint an Associate Dean

  20. Selection Process • Chairs and other faculty representatives from the appropriate division would form a search committee under the leadership of the Dean for Undergraduate Studies and Faculty. A position description would be developed and advertised, first and primarily in house. Given our experience with other similar positions in Academic Affairs, we may have to identify individuals with this kind of leadership potential and encourage them to apply.

  21. By AY13, we could imagine an undergraduate management structure that would consist of : • Foundation • Design & Media • Fine Arts • Art History (Chair) • Humanistic Studies (Chair) Under the Dean of Undergraduate Programs and Faculty, this group would constitute the Dean’s Advisory Committee.

  22. AY14 (or sooner): Appoint an Associate Dean of Liberal Arts • AY14 and beyond: Continue to make Associate Dean appointments that fulfill the ideal model.

  23. What’s Not Working • Communication • Clarity in Decision-Making

  24. Criteria for New Management Organization • Can’t cost (a lot) more • Feasible- High likelihood of implementation • Rational, efficient, and functional interface with faculty governance • Manage and support complexity • Create appropriately scaled management communities • Provide clear responsibility for decision-making • Createclearlines of communication

More Related