1 / 18

The Contiguity Effect – Theoretical Implications and Empirical Data

The Contiguity Effect – Theoretical Implications and Empirical Data. Mareike Florax, Shah Jamal Alam, Joaquim Silva Tübingen, 21/22.04.2005.  Overview. The basic idea of the principle; Theoretical explanation, Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller, 1999)

rosa
Télécharger la présentation

The Contiguity Effect – Theoretical Implications and Empirical Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Contiguity Effect – Theoretical Implications and Empirical Data Mareike Florax, Shah Jamal Alam, Joaquim Silva Tübingen, 21/22.04.2005

  2.  Overview • The basic idea of the principle; • Theoretical explanation, • Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller, 1999) • Model of Working Memory (Baddley, 2003) • Theory of Multimedial Learning (Mayer, 2001) • Empirical Findings; • Discussion.

  3.  The basic idea of the principle • Realm: • different sources of information, • e.g. written text and/or mathematical equation and/or pictures and/or spoken word ... (Ayres & Sweller, in press; Mayer, 2001), • that are intelligible in isolation.

  4.  The basic idea of the principle • Phenomenon: • Learning with integrated sourcesof information leads to better learning results than learning with seperated sources of information (Ayres & Sweller, in press; Mayer, 2001).

  5.  The basic idea of the principle • Integrated format, Chandler & Sweller (1991)

  6.  The basic idea of the principle • Seperated format, To test insulation resistance from conductors to earth: i) Disconnect appliances and busways during these tests. Make sure mainswitch is "on" and all fuses are "in". Remove main earth from neutral bar and set meter to read insulation. Connect one lead to earth wire at MEN bar and take first measure by connecting the other lead to the active. Take next measure by connecting the lead to the neutral. ii) If resistance is not high enough in either of the two tests in i) then measure each circuit separately. Results required: i) at least one megaohm, ii) same result as i) above. Chandler & Sweller (1991)

  7.  Different version of the principle • Split-attention effect (e.g. Tarmizi & Sweller, 1988); • Temporal contiguity (e.g. Moreno & Mayer, 1999); • Intra-representation split-attention effect (Lowe, 2003).

  8.  Cognitive Load Theory (e.g. Sweller, 1999) • Limited working memory (→ Baddely´s working memory model, 2003); • Unlimited long term memory (→ Chi, Glaser & Rees, 1982); • Intrinsic cognitive load: learning content, • Germane cognitive load: acquisition/elaboration of knowledge, • Extraneous cognitive load: format of learning material, •  • DANGER of cognitive overload !!!

  9.  „Cognitive Load -Explanation“ To test insulation resistance from conductors to earth: i) Disconnect appliances and busways during these tests. Make sure mainswitch is "on" and all fuses are "in". Remove main earth from neutral bar and set meter to read insulation. Connect one lead to earth wire at MEN bar and take first measure by connecting the other lead to the active. Take next measure by connecting the lead to the neutral. ii) If resistance is not high enough in either of the two tests in i) then measure each circuit separately. Results required: i) at least one megaohm, ii) same result as i) above. intrinsic CL = intrinsic CL extraneous CL > extraneous CL split of attention and “search-and-match processes” (Kalyuga, Ayres, Chandler & Sweller, 2003, p.25) “eliminates the need to mentally integrate multiple sources of information” (Ayres & Sweller, in press, p.2) germane CL < germane CL Learning results < learning results

  10.  Model of Working Memory (Baddeley, 2003) • Phonological loop (processes verbal and acoustic information); • Visuospatial sketchpad(processes visual and spatial information); • Central executive, • focuses attention on input, • divides attention to the subsystems, • switches attention between the subsystems; • Episodic buffer , • interface between the loop, the sketchpad and the long-term memory, • multimodal code, • controlled by the central executive .

  11.  Theory of Multimedia Learning (Mayer, 2001) • Limited capacity; • Dual channels; • Active processing. • Three kinds of cognitive learning demands, • essential processing, • incidential processing, • representational holding.

  12.  „Theory of Multimedia Learning-Explanation“ To test insulation resistance from conductors to earth: i) Disconnect appliances and busways during these tests. Make sure mainswitch is "on" and all fuses are "in". Remove main earth from neutral bar and set meter to read insulation. Connect one lead to earth wire at MEN bar and take first measure by connecting the other lead to the active. Take next measure by connecting the lead to the neutral. ii) If resistance is not high enough in either of the two tests in i) then measure each circuit separately. Results required: i) at least one megaohm, ii) same result as i) above. incidential processing > incidential processing representational holding > representational holding more demanding to hold text and illustration in working memory guides cognitive processes and encourages to integrate mental representations

  13.  Different reasons for the contiguity effect • Split of attention; • Memory demands; • Visual search processes; • mental integration processes; • Time loss.

  14.  Modality-specific processing (Paivio1986 ; Schnotz et al. 2002) • Dual Coding Theory • Representational units: • `imagens‘ • `logogens' • Types of processing: • Representational • Referential • Associative processing • Build connections • Processing theory (Kulhavy, Stock, & Kealy, 1993)

  15. Integrative Model of Text and Picture ComprehensionSchnotz and Bannert (1999). • Descriptive (left side) and Depictive (right side), • Interaction based on symbol processing; • Mental Representations; • Individual Differences; • Instructional Design; • Processing Strategies.

  16.  Empirical Support • Learning results from learning with spatial/ temporal separated material are compared to results from learning with integrated material; • Domains such as mathematics, physics, technical skills(car brakes, pumps), meteorology (lightning formation) or biology (human respiratory system), language acquisition.

  17.  Points of criticism • Definition separated vs. integrated material; • No objective measures of cognitive load, element interactivity, prior knowledge… • Visualizer/verbalizer the omnipotenz of the principles (if it is not split-attention, it is redundancy, or modality...

  18.  New helpful developments • Cognitive load measurement helpful ; • Eye tracking methods; • Investigation of the central executive.

More Related