1 / 21

e-Readiness Assessment - A Health Perspective -

Global e-Health Research and Training Program  Health Telematics Unit www.ucalgary.ca/telehealth. e-Readiness Assessment - A Health Perspective -. Dr. Shariq Khoja; MD, MS, PhD Student Global e-Health Research and Training Program Health Telematics Unit, University of Calgary,

rspringer
Télécharger la présentation

e-Readiness Assessment - A Health Perspective -

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Global e-Health Research and Training Program  Health Telematics Unit www.ucalgary.ca/telehealth e-Readiness Assessment- A Health Perspective - Dr. Shariq Khoja; MD, MS, PhD Student Global e-Health Research and Training Program Health Telematics Unit, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

  2. e-Readiness- Definition - • e-Readiness • The degree to which a community is prepared to participate in the networked world. • Measured by assessing the community’s relative advancement in the areas that are most critical for Information and Communications Technology (ICT) adoption and most important applications of ICT. Source: Center of International Development’s ‘Readiness for the networked world’

  3. e-Readiness- e-Readiness Assessment - • A method to assess if a community or institution is prepared to respond to a pre-identified problem, through ICT. • It is NOT classical ‘needs-assessment’ which identifies the issues or problems. • A strategy to identify gaps in the ability of a community or institution to implement an ‘e-health solution’ to its problems.

  4. e-Readiness- Importance - • Has high value • For both the planners of an activity and the participating communities. • Avoids delays and disappointments • Identifies any lack of preparedness of a community to implement a virtual response at an early stage. • Avoids huge losses in time, money and effort. • Can prepare remote communities in developing countries, in order to reduce the digital divide.

  5. e-Readiness- Importance - • Readiness is: • “An integral and preliminary step in successful adoption of an innovation”. (CANARIE report, 2002). • Required to successfully initiate a change process: Pre- contemplation Contemplation Preparation Action Maintenance Readiness Transtheoretical model of Behavioral Change (Richard W Scholl, 2002)

  6. e-Readiness- Tools for e-Readiness Assessment - • 22 e-readiness tools available on www.bridges.org. • Some important ones are: • Computer Systems Policy Project (CSPP’s) - Readiness Guide for Living in a Networked World. • Crenshaw and Robinson’s – ‘Cyber-space and Post Industrial Transformations: Cross-network Analysis of Internet’. • Center of International Development (CID’s) Readiness for the Networked World: A Guide for Developing Countries.

  7. e-Readiness- CID’s Guide for Developing Countries - • Creator: Center of International Development (CID) at Harvard University - 2000 (www.readinessguide.org) • Goal: To systemically organize the assessment of factors determining the network readiness of a community in the developing world. • Standards: ‘e-Ready’ society has: • Necessary physical infrastructure. • Integrated current ICT’s throughout communities and government • Strong telecommunications competition • Independent regulations with commitment to universal access • No limits on trade or foreign investments in ICT

  8. e-Readiness- CID’s Developing Country Guide - • Measures: • 19 different categories covering: availability, speed, and quality of network access; use of ICT in schools, the workplace, economy, government and everyday life; ICT policies; ICT training programs; and the diversity of organizations. • Results: • CID’s grid: • 5 groupings: Access, Learning, Society, Economy and Policies). • 4 stages of advancement in each of 19 categories

  9. e-Health Readiness- Definition - • e-Health Readiness: • Related to, but different from, e-readiness • Defined as: “The degree to which users, health care organizations, and the health system itself, are prepared to participate and succeed with e-health implementation”. (CANARIE- report, 2002) • Current activity: • Efforts underway to develop assessment tools for e-health / telehealth readiness.

  10. e-Health Readiness- Current Tools - • Lead organization: • Health Telematics Unit, University of Calgary • Activity: • Development of ‘Telehealth Readiness’ assessment tools for organizations and practitioners in the developed world. (Jennett P, 2003). • Key Components: • a) Organization’s Core-readiness • b) Organization’s engagement / planning readiness • c) Workplace environment readiness

  11. e-Health Readiness- Tool for Developing Countries - • Issue: • At this time there are no e-health readiness tools for developing countries • Study Goal: • Develop tools appropriate for developing countries • Study Team: • Collaboration of HTU, Supercourse and Institutions in Pakistan. • Setting: • To be tested in Pakistan using Supercourse

  12. e-Health Readiness- Assessment in Pakistan -

  13. e-Health Readiness- Assessment in Pakistan - • Process: • Building partnerships with the medical colleges and universities in Pakistan. • Collectively develop an ‘e-health readiness assessment tool’ for Supercourse. • Test the tool in various medical colleges in Pakistan. • Finalize a culturally sensitive tool for e-health readiness that can be used by participating institutions and Supercourse for other programs.

  14. e-Health Readiness- Proposed Tool for Developing Countries - • 5 Components will be assessed: • Core readiness • Cultural readiness (Access) • Learning (Training in Media) • Society (Internet use and interaction) • Policy (at institutional and government levels)

  15. Core Readiness- Component I - • Intended to measure basic characteristics of the target population: • Identification of need • Dissatisfaction with the status quo • Awareness • Comfort with language, and • Comfort with technology

  16. Cultural Readiness - Component II - • Intended to measure the minimum necessary accessto adequate network infrastructure: • Speed (bandwidth) and quality of Internet • Service and support • Hardware and software • Internet availability and affordability • Regular usage of computer and internet

  17. Learning Readiness- Component III - • Intended to measure the minimum required knowledge and training in the community to use ICT: • An institution’s access to ICT • Use of ICT to enhance education • The ICT workforce in the community

  18. Society Readiness- Component IV - • Intended to measure the Community’s use of ICT in regular activities: • Online communication • Availability of locally relevant content • Use of ICT in everyday life

  19. Policy Readiness- Component V - • Intended to measure creation of an enabling environment and culture at institutional and government levels: • ICT (telecommunications) regulations • Ethics • Mandatory courses and increasing availability • Influence of HFA over use of technology

  20. References • Bridges.org: Spanning the International Digital Divide. www.bridges.org. • CID’s Readiness for the Networked World: A Guide for Developing Countrieswww.readinessguide.org. • CANARIE report: Framework for Rural and Remote Readiness in Telehealth. June 2002.

  21. Acknowledgements • Dr. Richard Scott. Associate Professor and Harkness Associate. Global e-Health Research and Training Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. • Ronald E. LaPorte. Director, Disease Monitoring and Telecommunications. WHO Collaborating Center. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA., USA • Dr Sunita Dodani. Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health. Pittsburgh, PA., USA

More Related