1 / 44

NP-Completeness and Decision Problems

This reference provides an overview of NP-completeness and decision problems in computer science, including the classes P and NP, polynomial transformations, and NP-complete problems. It also explores the question of whether P is equal to NP and the importance of SATISFIABILITY as the first NP-complete problem.

rstjohn
Télécharger la présentation

NP-Completeness and Decision Problems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NP-CompletenessReference: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completenessby Garey and Johnson, W.H. Freeman and Company, 1979. NP-Completeness

  2. f(n) \ n 10 30 50 n 0.00001 sec 0.00003 sec 0.00005 sec n5 0.1 sec 24.3 sec 5.2 mins 2n 0.001 sec 17.9 mins 35.7 yrs General Problems, Input Size and Time Complexity • Time complexity of algorithms : polynomial time algorithm ("efficient algorithm") v.s. exponential time algorithm ("inefficient algorithm") NP-Completeness

  3. “Hard” and “easy’ Problems • Sometimes the dividing line between “easy” and “hard” problems is a fine one. For example • Find the shortest path in a graph from X to Y. (easy) • Find the longest path in a graph from X to Y. (with no cycles) (hard) • View another way – as “yes/no” problems • Is there a simple path from X to Y with weight <= M? (easy) • Is there a simple path from X to Y with weight >= M? (hard) • First problem can be solved in polynomial time. • All known algorithms for the second problem (could) take exponential time . NP-Completeness

  4. Decision problem: The solution to the problem is "yes" or "no". Most optimization problems can be phrased as decision problems (still have the same time complexity). Example : Assume we have a decision algorithm X for 0/1 Knapsack problem with capacity M, i.e. Algorithm X returns “Yes” or “No” to the question “is there a solution with profit  P subject to knapsack capacity  M?” NP-Completeness

  5. We can repeatedly run algorithm X for various profits(P values) to find an optimal solution. Example : Use binary search to get the optimal profit, maximum of lg pi runs. (where M is the capacity of the knapsack optimization problem) Min Bound Optimal Profit Max Bound 0 pi |___________________|_________________| Search for the optimal solution NP-Completeness

  6. The Classes of P and NP • The class P and Deterministic Turing Machine • Given a decision problem X, if there is a polynomial time Deterministic Turing Machine program that solves X, then X is belong to P • Informally, there is a polynomial time algorithm to solve the problem NP-Completeness

  7. The class NP and Non-deterministic Turing Machine • Given a decision problem X, if there is a polynomial time Non-deterministic Turing machine program that solves X, then X belongs to NP • Given a decision problem X. For every instance I of X, (a) guess solution S for I, and (b) check “is S a solution to I?”. If (a) and (b) can be done in polynomial time, then X belongs to NP. NP-Completeness

  8. NP • Obvious : P  NP, i.e. A problem in P does not need “guess solution”. The correct solution can be computed in polynomial time. P • Some problems which are in NP, but may not in P : • 0/1 Knapsack Problem • PARTITION Problem : Given a finite set of positive integers Z. Question : Is there a subset Z' of Z such that Sum of all numbers in Z' = Sum of all numbers in Z-Z' ? i.e.  Z' =  (Z-Z') NP-Completeness

  9. One of the most important open problem in theoretical compute science :Is P=NP ? Most likely “No”. Currently, there are many known problems in NP, and there is no solution to show anyone of them in P. NP-Completeness

  10. NP-Complete Problems • Stephen Cook introduced the notion of NP-Complete Problems. This makes the problem “P = NP ?” much more interesting to study. • The following are several important things presented by Cook : NP-Completeness

  11. Polynomial Transformation ("  ") • L1  L2 : There is a polynomial time transformation that transforms arbitrary instance of L1 to some instance of L2. • If L1  L2 then L2 is in P implies L1 is in P (or L1 is not in P implies L2 is not in P) • If L1  L2 and L2  L3 then L1  L3 NP-Completeness

  12. Focus on the class of NP – decision problems only. Many intractable problems, when phrased as decision problems, belong to this class. • L is NP-Complete if L NP and for all other L'  NP, L'  L • If a problem in NP-complete can be solved in polynomial time then all problems in NP can be solved in polynomial time. • If a problem in NP cannot be solved in polynomial time then all problems in NP-complete cannot be solved in polynomial time. Note that an NP-complete problem is one of those hardest problems in NP. L NP NP-Completeness

  13. So, if an NP-complete problem is in P then P=NP • if P != NP then all NP-complete problems are in NP-P Question : how can we obtain the first NP-complete problem L? • Cook Theorem : SATISFIABILITY is NP-Complete. (The first NP-Complete problem) Instance : Given a set of variables, U, and a collection of clauses, C, over U. Question : Is there a truth assignment for U that satisfies all clauses in C? NP-Completeness

  14. Example : U = {x1, x2} C1 = {(x1, ¬ x2), (¬ x1, x2)} = (x1 OR ¬ x2) AND (¬ x1 OR x2) if x1 = x2 = True  C1 = True C2 = (x1, x2) (x1, ¬ x2) (¬ x1)  not satisfiable “¬ xi ”= “not xi ” “OR”= “logical or” “AND”= “logical and” This problem is also called “CNF-Satisfiability” since the expression is in CNF – Conjunctive Normal Form (the product of sums). NP-Completeness

  15. With the Cook Theorem, we have the following property : Lemma : If L1 and L2 belong to NP, L1 is NP-complete, and L1  L2 then L2 is NP-complete. i.e. L1, L2 NP and for all other L'  NP, L'  L1 and L1  L2  L'  L2 NP-Completeness

  16. So now, to prove a problem L to be NP-complete problem , we need to • show L is in NP • select a known NP-complete problem L' • construct a polynomial time transformation f from L' to L • prove the correctness of f (i.e. L’ has a solution if and only if L has a solution) and that f is a polynomial transformation NP-Completeness

  17. A group of problems, including all of the ones we have discussed (Satisfiability, 0/1 Knapsack, Longest Path, Partition) have an additional important property: If any of them can be solved in polynomial time, then they all can! • P: Problems solvable by deterministic algorithms in polynomial time • NP: Problems solved by non-deterministic algorithms in polynomial time NP-Complete NP P • These problems are called NP-complete problems. NP-Completeness

  18. Some NP-complete problems : • SATISFIABILITY • 0/1 Knapsack • PARTITION • Two-Processor Non-Preemptive Schedule Length • CLIQUE : An undirected graph G=(V, E) and a positive integer J  |V| Question : Does G contain a clique (complete subgraph) of size J or more? NP-Completeness

  19. Proving NP-Completeness Results • Example 1 : Show that the PARTITION problem is NP-complete. Given a known NPC problem - Sum of Subset Problem (SS), show that PARTITION problem is NPC. SS Problem Instance : Let A = {a1, a2, …, an} be a set of n positive numbers. Question : Given M, is there a subset A'  A such that A' = M NP-Completeness

  20. PARTITION Problem Instance : Given a finite set of m positive integers Z. Question : Is there a subset Z'  Z such that  Z' =  (Z-Z') • PARTITION is in NP guess a subset Z' O(m) verify  Z' =  (Z-Z')? O(m) Total O(m) NP-Completeness

  21. SS  PARTITION Given an arbitrary instance of SS, i.e. A = {a1, a2, …, an} and M, Construct an instance of PARTITION as follows : B={b1, b2, …, bn, bn+1, bn+2} of m = n+2 positive numbers where  bi = ai for 1  i  n bn+1 = M + 1 bn+2 =A + (1 – M) Note :  bi = 2 A + 2. Also, the transformation can be done in polynomial time (based on input size of A & M) NP-Completeness

  22. To show the transformation is correct : The SS problem has a solution if and only if the PARTITION problem has a solution. • If SS problem has a solution, then the PARTITION problem has a solution assume A' is the solution for SS problem then Z' = A'  {bn+2} and Z-Z' =A-A'  {bn+1}  Z' = M + A + (1 – M) = A + 1 =  (Z-Z') NP-Completeness

  23. If the PARTITION problem has a solution then the SS problem has a solution if Z' is the solution then  Z' = A + 1  exactly one of bn+2 orbn+1 Z'  if bn+2  Z' then Z' – { bn+2 } = A' and  A' = M if bn+1 Z', then use Z - Z' to obtain A' NP-Completeness

  24. Example 2 : Show that the Traveling Salesman (TS) Problem is NP-complete. Given a known NPC problem - Hamiltonian Circuit (HC), show that TS problem is NPC. Hamiltonian Circuit (HC) problem Instance : Give an undirected graph G=(V, E) Question : Does G contain a Hamiltonian circuit, i.e. a sequence < v1, v2, …, vn > of all vertices in V which is a simple cycle. NP-Completeness

  25. Traveling Salesman (TS) Problem Instance : Give an undirected complete graph G=(V, E) with distance d(i,j)  0 for each edge (i,j) for i  j and a positive integer B. Question : Is there a tour of all cities (a simple cycle with all vertices) having total distance no more than B. • TS is in NP guess a tour, i.e. sequence of all vertices O(|V|) verify that it is a cycle covering all vertices and total distance  B O(|V|) NP-Completeness

  26. HC  TS Given arbitrary instance of HC, i.e. G=(V, E). Construct an instance of TS as follows : G’ = (V , E’ ), where (u,v)  E’ for all u, v  V and u  v d(u,v) = 0 if (u,v)  E d(u,v) = 1 if (u,v)  E and B = 0 Note : The transformation can be done in polynomial time (based on input size of V and E) NP-Completeness

  27. To show the transformation is correct : The HC problem has a solution if and only if the TS problem has a solution. • If HC problem has a solution, then TS problem has a solution Assume a < v1, v2, …, vn > is the solution for HC  It is a simple cycle which contains all vertices  Each edge (u,v) in this cycle has d(u,v) = 0  Total distance is 0  Solution for TS • If TS problem has a solution then HC problem has a solution Obvious to see. NP-Completeness

  28. Example 3 : Show that the Vertex Cover (VC) Problem is NP-complete. Given 3SAT problem is NPC, show that VC problem is NPC. 3SAT Problem Instance : Given a set of variables U = {u1, u2, …, un} and a collection of clauses C = {c1, c2, …, cm} over U such that | ci | = 3 for 1  i  m. Question : Is there a truth assignment for U that satisfies all clauses in C? Note : 3SAT problem is a restricted problem of SATISFIABILITY problem. NP-Completeness

  29. Vertex Cover (VC) Problem Instance : Given an undirected graph G=(V, E) and a positive integer K  |V| Question : Is there a vertex cover of size K or less for G, i.e. a subset V’  V such that |V’|  K and, for each (u,v)  E, at least one of u or v  V’. • VC is in NP guess a set of vertices V’  V O(|V|) verify that |V’|  K and, for each (u,v)  E, u  V’ or v  V’ O(|V|+|E|) NP-Completeness

  30. 3SAT  VC Given arbitrary instance of 3SAT, i.e. U = {u1, u2, …, un} and C = {c1, c2, …, cm}. Construct an instance of VC as follows : • G = (V , E ) and K = n+2m • V = Vu Vc Vu = {u1t, u1f, u2t, u2f, …, unt, unf} and Vc = {a11, a12, a13}  {a21, a22, a23}  …  {am1, am2, am3} NP-Completeness

  31. E = Eu Ec Euc Eu = {(u1t, u1f) , (u2t, u2f) , …, (unt, unf)} Ec = {(a11, a12), (a12, a13), (a13, a11)}  …  {(am1, am2), (am2, am3), (am3, am1)} Assume ci = (xi, yi, zi) for 1  i  m, find the corresponding vertices, xi, yi, zi, in Vu Euc = {(x1, a11), (y1, a12), (z1, a13)}  …  {(xm, am1), (ym, am2), (zm, am3)} NP-Completeness

  32. |V| = 2n+3m and |E| = n+3m+3m • The transformation can be done in polynomial time (based on input size n and m) Example : U = {u1, u2, u3 , u4} and C = {{u1, ¬ u3, ¬ u4}, {u1, u2, ¬ u4}} Eu u1f u2t u2f u3t u3f u4t u4f u1t Euc E  a22 a12 Ec a11 a13 a21 a23 NP-Completeness

  33. Major Property : if there is a vertex cover set V’  K = n+2m, then • |V’| = n+ 2m, and • V’ must include exactly 1 vertex in {uit, uif} for 1  i  n from Vu and at exactly 2 vertices in {ai1, ai2, ai3} for 1  i  m from Vc, i.e. n vertices from Vu and 2m vertices from Vc • Look at edges in Eu and Ec, a vertex cover set V’ must include at least 1 vertex {uit, uif} for 1  i  n, and at least 2 vertices from {ai1, ai2, ai3} for 1  i  m. Since |V’|  K  |V’| = K NP-Completeness

  34. To show the transformation is correct : The 3SAT problem has a solution if and only if the VC problem has a solution. • If VC problem has a solution then 3SAT problem has a solution From the above property, V’ contains n vertices from Vu and 2m vertices from Vc From Vu , the truth assignment for {u1, u2, …, un} in 3SAT is ui = T if uit V’ ui = F if uif  V’ for 1  i  n NP-Completeness

  35. To see that this is a solution for 3SAT : we must show that for each ci = (xi, yi, zi), there is at least one variable i {xi, yi, zi} which set ci to TRUE, 1  i  n From the above property, exactly 2 vertices from {ai1, ai2, ai3} in V’, for 1  i  m only cover 2 edges from {(xi, ai1), (yi, ai2), (zi, ai3)} from Euc assume the edge (xi, ai1) is not covered by 2 vertices from {ai1, ai2, ci3} then xi  V’ since V’ is a vertex cover set xi set the clause ci to True for 1  i  n NP-Completeness

  36. If the 3SAT problem has a solution, then the VC problem has a solution The vertex cover set V’ with exactly n+2m vertices can be obtained as follows : From the truth assignment for {u1, u2, …, un} in 3SAT, we get n vertices from Vu, i.e. uit V’ if ui = T; otherwise uif V’ for 1  i  n This covers all edges in Eu and at least one edge in {(xi, ai1), (yi, ai2), (zi, ai3)} for 1  i  m From Vc, include 2 vertices from each {ai1, ai2, ai3} into V’, for 1  i  m. These 2 vertices cover all edges {(ai1, ai2), (ai2, ai3), (ai3, ai1)} and also cover edges in Euc that are not covered previously. NP-Completeness

  37. Example 4 : Show that the Square Packing (SP) Problem is NP-complete. Motivation : truck loading, processor allocation problem in a partitionable mesh connected system, the design of VLSI chips and etc. Square Packing Problem Given a packing square S and a set of packed squares L = {s1, s2, ..., sn}. Question : is there and orthogonal packing of L into S? Note : orthogonal packing  the sides of squares are parallel to the vertical and horizontal axes NP-Completeness

  38. 3-Partition Problem Given a list A = {a1, a2, ..., a3z} of 3z positive integers such that sum of all numbers is zB and B/4 < ai < B/2 for each 1  i  3z. Question : Can A be partitioned into z groups such that the sum of allnumbers in each group is B. Note : each group must have exactly 3 numbers Proof : Refer to the following research paper Leung, Tam, Wong, Young and Chin, “Packing Squares into a Square”, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 1990. NP-Completeness

  39. Coping with NP-Completeness Problem • NP-hard Problem Note : Refer to Chapter 5 of Garey and Johnson If L' L and L' is an NP-complete problem then L is called NP-hard problem. All NPC problems are NP-hard. NP-Completeness

  40. There are some NP-hard decision problems that are not in NP. Example : Kth Largest Subset Problem is not in NP Instance : Given a set of positive integers A = {a1, a2, …, an}, and two non-negative numbers, B A and K  2|A|. Question : Are there at least K distinct subsets A’  A such that each subset has total sum >= B. Note : PARTITION problem  Kth Largest Subset Problem NP-Completeness

  41. Pseudo-polynomial time algorithm Note : Refer to Chapter 4 of Garey and Johnson Some NP-complete problem may be solved in "polynomial" time (based on input size and magnitude). Example : PARTITION problem NP-Completeness

  42. Dynamic Programming Algorithm : • assume B = (sum of n integers)/2 • construct a table of size (approx.) n x B • fill in the table row by row • for each row, add a new element mark sum of all possible subsets if there is a subset with sum = B, stop. Time Complexity : O(nB) NP-Completeness

  43. NP-completeness in the strong sense Note : Refer to Chapter 4 of Garey and Johnson If L is NP-complete problem in the strong sense, then L cannot be solved by a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm unless P=NP L is NP-complete in the strong sense if L'  L , L' is NP-complete in the strong sense and L is in NP Example : 3-partition problem is NPC in the strong sense. NP-Completeness

  44. Solving more restricted problems If we restricted the problem L to problem L' i.e. L' is a special/restricted case of L, then we may solve L' in polynomial time. For example : PARTITION problem if we assume that each input integer ai n, where n is the number of input integers, then the pseudo polynomial time algorithm becomes polynomial time algorithm, i.e. O(n3) NP-Completeness

More Related