1 / 39

Practical FRBR

Practical FRBR. Kathryn Lybarger University of Kentucky RDA Camp 2013 Preliminary session. Dublin Core. Title Creator Subject Description Publisher Contributor Date Type Format Identifier Source Language Relation Coverage Rights. All elements are optional and repeatable.

ruana
Télécharger la présentation

Practical FRBR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Practical FRBR Kathryn Lybarger University of Kentucky RDA Camp 2013 Preliminary session

  2. Dublin Core • Title • Creator • Subject • Description • Publisher • Contributor • Date • Type • Format • Identifier • Source • Language • Relation • Coverage • Rights All elements are optional and repeatable.

  3. A sample Dublin Core record

  4. A sample Dublin Core record Title: The Callahan Chronicals Creator: Spider Robinson Date: 1997 Date: 1977 Date: May 19, 2000 Language: American

  5. A sample Dublin Core record Title: The Callahan Chronicals Creator: Spider Robinson Publisher: Tor Date:1997 Language: English Type: Text Format: text Identifier: ISBN 0812539370

  6. Why are these not useful? • Some fields should be required • Some fields should not be repeatable • Fields should be entered in a consistent format • Some fields should be from a standard vocabulary • (It’s hard to ingest a PowerPoint slide into your ILS)

  7. Dublin Core in Kentucky Digital Library • Dublin Core is the core of its metadata • Accepts data / metadata submissions from all over the state • Not enough time / subject expertise to do all description here • Guidelines describe specifics of metadata that should be provided

  8. KDL Guidelines: Which elements? Required fields must be submitted in order for content to be ingested: • format • language • Kentucky-specific subject • resource type • rights • title Required if available: • creator • date • source Other elements (EAD): • biography/history • scope and content • arrangement

  9. KDL Guidelines: Format/Vocabulary • Date: To enhance discoverability and automated maintenance processes, KDL requires the use of ISO 8601 for the entry of the most date fields; in other words, KDL uses the standard form of YYYY-MM-DD. This is used in Date, Terminal Date, Date Range Start and Date Range End fields. • Language • Scheme: ISO 639 • Examples: en, es

  10. KDL Guidelines: How to encode? • Submit fields through online form • Type with a certain format • Choose vocabulary from a pulldown menu • METS template • Framework with descriptive elements / files • Block of Dublin Core according to guidelines

  11. Data Model + Application Profile • Dublin Core is a data model • Elements / Entities • Relationships • Kentucky Digital Library has an application profile • Which elements are used • Which elements are required • Which elements are repeatable • Value restrictions – Format? Vocabularies? • How to encode in a standard way? • (any extras added?)

  12. FRBR + RDA • Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) • Data model • Entities • Relationships • Resource Description and Access (RDA) • Application profile for FRBR • Which elements are required (“Core”) • How should values be recorded/transcribed? • How should records be encoded?

  13. Why bother with a profile? • Why not just implement and index all fields and relationships? • FRBR is HUGE • Recording everything would take forever • Elements can be recorded in different ways

  14. Must specify and prioritizewith an eye to: • Find • Identify • Select • Obtain

  15. Find • Findinvolves meeting a user’s search criteria through an attribute or a relationship of an entity. This can be seen to combine both the traditional “find” and “collocate” objectives of a catalog. • When a patron enters something sensible, they should find (at least) the title they are looking for • Once they have found something good, similar things should be one step away

  16. Identify • Identifyenables a user to confirm they have found what they looked for, distinguishing among similar resources. • A researcher should be able to work from a citation and find the original resource • A copy cataloger should be confident they have found the right record

  17. Select • Selectinvolves meeting a user’s requirements with respect to content, physical format, etc. or to reject an entity that doesn’t meet the user’s needs. • Is the novel in English? Is it in large print? • Is the movie on DVD or VHS? • Is it a basic math text, or research level?

  18. Obtain • Obtainenables a user to acquire an entity through purchase, loan, etc., or electronic remote access. • Online resource records should include working links to the resource • Physical items should have a call number

  19. Why FRBR? (Simpler?) • W • Area 4 • Area 2 • Area 1 • Area 5 • Area 3 AACR2 (ISBD) FRBR MARC MARC

  20. FRBR model is more complex

  21. FRBR allows more relationships

  22. MANY more relationships(only some reciprocal) Group 2 Entity Group 2 Entity Group 3 Entity Corporate Body Person Subject Group 1 Entity Group 1 Entity

  23. Many works have only one expression and manifestation

  24. A work might have two expressions

  25. An expression might have two manifestations

  26. In a FRBR catalog… embodies

  27. FRBRization? • Many catalogs now claim to do “FRBRization”, but… • “FRBR is a matter of display, so it will be handled by the discovery layer.”—An ILS vendor • Manifestation records are identified as being the same work, and displayed as such in search results

  28. Automatically detect relationships? • Uniform titles might help us identify expressions of the same work • Author + Title might help us identify manifestations of the same expression • So we can do some grouping.

  29. Related works? • Sequels/Prequels? • Dramatizations? • Adaptations? • Analysis? • Whole/Part relationships? • Preceding/Succeeding titles?

  30. Relationships: Single MARC fields • Preceding/Succeeding titles • 780 00 ‡t Citizen (Berea, Ky.) ‡w (DLC)sn85052076 • 785 00 ‡t Berea citizen ‡w (DLC)sn 85052075 ‡w (OCoLC)12249111 • Other forms • 776 08 ‡i Online version: ‡a Amodio, Mark. ‡t Anglo- Saxon literature handbook ‡d Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2014 ‡z 9781118286494 ‡w (DLC) 2013005429

  31. Relationships: More MARC fields • Translations • 041 1_ ‡a chi ǂheng • 240 10 ‡a臨濟錄. ǂlEnglish • 500 __ ‡a Translation from the Chinese • Whole/part • 100 1_ ‡a Pokras, Barbara. • 245 10 ‡a Feeding Mrs. Moskowitz / ‡c Barbara Pokras. The caregiver / Fran PokrasYariv. • 700 12 ‡a Yariv, Fran Pokras. ‡t Caregiver. • 740 02 ‡a Caregiver.

  32. Relationships: MARC notes fields • Based on: • 245 10 ‡a West Side story. • 500 __ ‡a Based on: Romeo and Juliet / William Shakespeare. • Remake of: • 245 10 ‡a Gaslight / ǂcLoew's Incorporated ; directed by George Cukor … • 500 __ ‡a Remake of the 1939 motion picture, Gaslight.

  33. RDA provides more structure for recording relationships • Between works: • 245 10 ‡a Nightlight / the Harvard Lampoon. • 700 1_ ‡iParody of (work) : ‡a Meyer, Stephenie, ‡d 1973- ‡t Twilight ‡w (DLC)2004024730 • Between expressions: • 245 00 ‡a Total recall / ‡c Columbia Pictures … • 730 0_ ‡iRemake of (expression) : ‡a Total recall (Motion picture : 1990) ‡w (OCoLC)247127957 • Relationship designators are from an established vocabulary

  34. Relationship designators have associated URIs • URI = Uniform Resource Identifier • Looks like a URL • May or may not go to a live web page • Parody of (work) • http://rdvocab.info/RDARelationshipsWEMI/parodyOfWork • Remake of (expression) • http://rdvocab.info/RDARelationshipsWEMI/remakeOfExpression

  35. URIs in a Linked Data environment • If we could control relationships like headings: • (actually storing the URI instead of the label text) • Localization is moved to display • English catalogs could display the English label • German catalogs could display the German label • No parallel records would be needed – we could use the same records! 700 1 • ‡iParody of (work) : ‡a Meyer, Stephenie, ‡d 1973- ‡t Twilight ‡w (DLC)2004024730

  36. What is being linked? • Some relationship designators refer explicitly to links between works or expressions • It seems weird to use them to link manifestation records • It is probably not harmful; ambiguous terms are qualified • Form of work: novel, play, map, sonata • Form of expression: musical notation, musical sound • Form of carrier: sound cassette, videodisc • Shouldn’t works and expressions have their own records with identifiers?

  37. How does FRBR help us now? • Some systems are using FRBR concepts (Open Library) • We could derive new records with selected fields • RDA Toolkit is organized by FRBR entities and relationships

  38. References • Barbara Tillett. What is FRBR? A conceptual model of the bibliographic universe. http://www.loc.gov/cds/downloads/FRBR.PDF • IFLA. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records http://www.ifla.org/publications/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records • The RDA (Resource Description and Access) Vocabularies (open metadata registry) http://rdvocab.info/

  39. FRBR Craft Time!

More Related