1 / 22

The Inland Extent of Lake-Effect Snow (LES) Bands: Project Update

The Inland Extent of Lake-Effect Snow (LES) Bands: Project Update . Joe Villani NOAA/NWS, Albany, NY Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY U.S./Canada Great Lakes Meteorology Workshop April 16, 2013. Outline. Goals Methodology Results Forecast application

rufin
Télécharger la présentation

The Inland Extent of Lake-Effect Snow (LES) Bands: Project Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Inland Extent of Lake-Effect Snow (LES) Bands: Project Update Joe Villani NOAA/NWS, Albany, NY Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY U.S./Canada Great Lakes Meteorology Workshop April 16, 2013

  2. Outline • Goals • Methodology • Results • Forecast application • Latest improvement efforts • Future Work

  3. Goals • Single out the atmospheric ingredients typically most influential on the inland extent (IE) of LES bands • Use this information to formulate predictive techniques in an operational setting

  4. Methodology • Investigate LES events over an extended period (2006-2009 across Central/Eastern NY) • Pick a number of locations both inside and just outside of LES bands at specified time intervals (0000, 0600, 1200, and 1800 UTC) • Select parameters and see which correlate best to IE distances • 12 km NAM initial-hour soundings

  5. Example of Data Points Points in and near the LES band ALY sounding BUF sounding

  6. Parameters

  7. Correlations • Best IE parameters: (ALY) [BGM] • Multi-Lake connection (MLC, Yes or No) = [0.73] (0.59) • 850 mb lake-air differentials = (-0.64) [-0.63] • Capping Inversion Hgts = (0.53) • 0-1 km speed shear = (0.44) [0.34] • 0-3 km speed shear = [0.03] • Bottom line: Lake-lake influence + Elevated ML + Cond/Mdt Instab + Strong 0-1 km flow = Deep IE (Type A)

  8. Favorable IE (Type A) Example Sounding Corresponding Radar

  9. Unfavorable IE (Type B) Example Sounding Corresponding Radar

  10. Another Recent Type B Radar Image (22 Jan 13) IE Application Output

  11. IE Application Example • * Prior statistics / correlations boil down to a multi-element regression equation • * Produces an IE estimate for Lk Ont bands

  12. IE Application Results • For LES events that impacted Central NY (WFO BGM), results were fairly similar to those from Eastern NY (WFO ALY) • W flow events (250-280 wind vector) • Mostly single-band cases • Usually good IE estimates (within 10-20 miles) • Tendency to under-estimate for deep inland bands • NW flow events (290-330 wind vector) • Mix of single and multi-bands • Under-estimated at times

  13. Under-Estimate Source ? • Which term(s) of the IE equation were most problematic? • It would seem those dealing with moisture availability • A simple Y/N for MLC likely not adequate • How do we improve?

  14. “Effective Fetch” • This concept was designed to better represent moisture contributions from upstream lakes • Tries to simulate the additive effects of long fetch distances

  15. IE Term Adaptation Choice of upstream lakes now available

  16. Example from 6-7 Dec 2010 in WFO BGM’s Area IE Output: 80 nm

  17. Visible Satellite Image * Effective fetch across Georgian Bay/Lake Ontario was nearly 200 nmi * Modifying the MLC term improved the IE output substantially

  18. Anticipating MLC • Not necessarily intuitive in forecast mode • What tools can be provided to help operational meteorologists in this regard? • Trajectories • Analogs / Composites • Simulated Satellite / Radar products

  19. Forward Trajectory

  20. Using Synoptic Analogs/Composite Plots * Can help forecasters identify favorable patterns when extensive IE might be expected * Could conceivably stratify by flow regime / type of event

  21. The Future • Better visualization • Efforts are underway to add a graphical component to the current AWIPS IE application • IE application could conceivably be adapted to other portions of the Great Lakes region • Do high-resolution models reasonably simulate inland extent ?

  22. Questions? Joe.Villani@noaa.gov Michael.Jurewicz@noaa.gov

More Related