670 likes | 758 Vues
New Galerkin Methods for High-frequency Scattering Simulations. Fatih Ecevit Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences. Collaborations. Universidad Pública de Navarra University of Bath. V í ctor Dom í nguez Ivan Graham. I. Electromagnetic & acoustic scattering problems. II.
E N D
New Galerkin Methods forHigh-frequency Scattering Simulations Fatih Ecevit Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences Collaborations Universidad Pública de Navarra University of Bath Víctor Domínguez Ivan Graham
I. Electromagnetic & acoustic scattering problems II. High-frequency integral equation methods • Main principles (BGMR 2004) • A robust Galerkin scheme (DGS 2006) • Required improvements III. New Galerkin methods for high-frequency scattering simulations • Two new algorithms New Galerkin methods for high-frequency scattering simulations Outline
I. Electromagnetic & Acoustic Scattering Simulations Governing Equations Maxwell Eqns. Helmholtz Eqn. (TE, TM, Acoustic)
I. Electromagnetic & Acoustic Scattering Simulations Scattering Simulations Basic Challenges: Fields oscillate on the order of wavelength • Computational cost • Memory requirement Numerical Methods: Convergent (error-controllable) • Variational methods (MoM, FEM, FVM,…) • Differential Eqn. methods (FDTD,…) • Integral Eqn. methods(FMM, H-matrices,…) • Asymptotic methods(GO, GTD,…) Demand resolution of wavelength Discretization independent of frequency Non-convergent (error )
I. Combine… Electromagnetic & Acoustic Scattering Simulations Scattering Simulations Basic Challenges: Fields oscillate on the order of wavelength • Computational cost • Memory requirement Numerical Methods: Convergent (error-controllable) • Variational methods (MoM, FEM, FVM,…) • Differential Eqn. methods (FDTD,…) • Integral Eqn. methods(FMM, H-matrices,…) • Asymptotic methods(GO, GTD,…) Demand resolution of wavelength Discretization independent of frequency Non-convergent (error )
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Integral Equation Formulations Boundary Condition: Radiation Condition:
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Integral Equation Formulations Boundary Condition: Radiation Condition: Single layer potential: Double layer potential:
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Integral Equation Formulations Boundary Condition: Radiation Condition: Single layer potential: 1st kind 2nd kind Double layer potential: 2nd kind
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Convex Obstacle: Ansatz Single layer density: Double layer density:
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Convex Obstacle: Ansatz Single layer density: Double layer density:
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Convex Obstacle: Ansatz Single layer density: Double layer density:
II. current High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Convex Obstacle: Ansatz Single layer density: Bruno, Geuzaine, Monro, Reitich (2004) Double layer density: is non-physical
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Convex Obstacle: Ansatz Single layer density:
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Convex Obstacle: Ansatz Single layer density: BGMR (2004)
II. Highly oscillatory! High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Convex Obstacle A Convergent High-frequency Approach
II. Highly oscillatory! High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Convex Obstacle A Convergent High-frequency Approach Localized Integration: for all n BGMR (2004)
II. (Melrose & Taylor, 1985) High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Convex Obstacle A Convergent High-frequency Approach
II. (Melrose & Taylor, 1985) High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Convex Obstacle A Convergent High-frequency Approach Change of Variables: BGMR (2004)
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Smooth Convex Obstacle • Bruno, Geuzaine, Monro, Reitich … 2004 … • Bruno, Geuzaine (3D)……………. 2006 …
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Smooth Convex Obstacle • Bruno, Geuzaine, Monro, Reitich … 2004 … • Bruno, Geuzaine (3D)……………. 2006 … • Huybrechs, Vandewalle …….…… 2006 …
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Smooth Convex Obstacle • Bruno, Geuzaine, Monro, Reitich … 2004 … • Bruno, Geuzaine (3D)……………. 2006 … • Huybrechs, Vandewalle …….…… 2006 … • Domínguez, Graham, Smyshlyaev … 2006 … (circler bd.)
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Smooth Convex Obstacle • Bruno, Geuzaine, Monro, Reitich … 2004 … • Bruno, Geuzaine (3D)……………. 2006 … • Huybrechs, Vandewalle …….…… 2006 … • Domínguez, Graham, Smyshlyaev … 2006 … (circler bd.) Single Convex Polygon • Chandler-Wilde, Langdon ….…….. 2006 .. • Langdon, Melenk …………..……… 2006 ..
II. High-frequency Integral Equation Methods Single Smooth Convex Obstacle • Bruno, Geuzaine, Monro, Reitich … 2004 … • Bruno, Geuzaine (3D)……………. 2006 … • Huybrechs, Vandewalle …….…… 2006 … • Domínguez, Graham, Smyshlyaev … 2006 … (circler bd.) • Domínguez, E., Graham, ………… 2007 … (circler bd.) Single Convex Polygon • Chandler-Wilde, Langdon ….…….. 2006 .. • Langdon, Melenk …………..……… 2006 ..
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) The Combined Field Operator
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) The Combined Field Operator Continuity: Giebermann (1997) circler domains …………… DGS (2006) general smooth domains …
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) The Combined Field Operator Continuity: Giebermann (1997) circler domains …………… DGS (2006) general smooth domains … Coercivity: DGS (2006) circler domains …………… general smooth domains … open problem
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Plane-wave Scattering Problem
II. is an explicitly defined entire function with known asymptotics are smooth periodic functions is not explicitly known but behaves like: A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Plane-wave Scattering Problem
II. is an explicitly defined entire function with known asymptotics are smooth periodic functions is not explicitly known but behaves like: A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Plane-wave Scattering Problem Melrose, Taylor (1985) DGS (2006)
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Plane-wave Scattering Problem
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Plane-wave Scattering Problem for some on the “deep” shadow
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Plane-wave Scattering Problem for some on the “deep” shadow DGS (2006)
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Polynomial Approximation Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Polynomial Approximation Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … gluing together
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Polynomial Approximation Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … gluing together
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Polynomial Approximation Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … gluing together … approximation by zero
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Polynomial Approximation Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … gluing together is the optimal choice
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Galerkin Method Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … gluing together Discrete space
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Galerkin Method Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … gluing together Final Estimate
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Galerkin Method Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … gluing together Final Estimate QuestionCan one obtain a robust Galerkin method that works for higher frequencies as well as low frequencies?
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Galerkin Method Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … gluing together Final Estimate In other words higher frequencies: low frequencies: do an approximation on the deep shadow region??
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Galerkin Method Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … gluing together Final Estimate
II. A High-frequency Galerkin Method DGS (2006) Galerkin Method Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … gluing together Final Estimate In other words higher frequencies: low frequencies: do an approximation on the deep shadow region??
III. A straightforward extension of the Galerkin approximation in DGS (2006) applies to deep shadow region New Galerkin methods for high-frequency scattering simulations New Galerkin Methods Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … new Galerkin methods … gluing together Treat these four transition regionsseparately
III. A straightforward extension of the Galerkin approximation in DGS (2006) applies to deep shadow region New Galerkin methods for high-frequency scattering simulations New Galerkin Methods Deep Shadow Shadow Boundaries Illuminated Region … new Galerkin methods … gluing together Treat these four transition regionsseparately The highly oscillatory integrals arising in the Galerkin matrices can be efficiently evaluated as the stationary phase points are apriory known
III. New Galerkin methods for high-frequency scattering simulations New Galerkin Methods
III. New Galerkin methods for high-frequency scattering simulations New Galerkin Methods
III. New Galerkin methods for high-frequency scattering simulations New Galerkin Methods
III. New Galerkin methods for high-frequency scattering simulations New Galerkin Methods
III. New Galerkin methods for high-frequency scattering simulations New Galerkin Methods