1 / 15

Update on Proportionate Review Management Information for Ethical Research (Oct-Dec 2011)

This report provides a summary of the Proportionate Review (PR) process for ethical research in England, Wales, and Scotland during the final quarter of 2011. It highlights the availability of PR slots, the total number of applications reviewed, and average review times. Key findings include the review of 258 applications, with an average decision time of 14.8 days, and a breakdown of favorable opinions. It also details the pilot program in Northern Ireland and decisions given per Research Ethics Committee (REC) Centre across the regions.

rune
Télécharger la présentation

Update on Proportionate Review Management Information for Ethical Research (Oct-Dec 2011)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. October-December 2011 • Proportionate Review • Management Information Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  2. PRS Update (Feb/Mar 2012) • PR currently available in England; Wales and Scotland: • England- 6 REC Centres • Wales- 1 REC • Scotland- 1REC • Northern Ireland piloting PR until May 2012 Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  3. PRS management information Summary(Oct-Dec 2011) • On average 110 PR slots were available a month • Total number of PR applications reviewed: 258 • Average time taken for review: 14.8 days • Favourable opinions: 35% • Favourable opinions with Conditions: 24% Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  4. Workload (Oct-Dec 2011)England, Wales and Scotland Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  5. Decisions given at PRSC (Oct-Dec 2011) England, Wales and Scotland Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  6. Days taken to issue a decision (Oct-Dec2011)England, Wales and Scotland Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  7. Type of studies reviewed (Oct-Dec 2011)England Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  8. Decisions given per REC Centre (Oct-Dec2011)London Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  9. Decisions given per REC Centre (Oct-Dec2011)East Midlands Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  10. Decisions given per REC Centre (Oct-Dec2011)North West Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  11. Decisions given per REC Centre (Oct-Dec2011)North East Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  12. Decisions given per REC Centre (Oct-Dec2011)South West Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  13. Decisions given per REC Centre (Oct-Dec2011)East of England Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  14. Decisions given per REC Centre (Oct-Dec2011)North Wales Facilitating and promoting ethical research

  15. Decisions given per REC Centre (Oct-Dec2011)Scotland Facilitating and promoting ethical research

More Related