1 / 39

The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition

The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition. Preyanan Larbanantaphol M.4/4 No.4 Ratima Vangsawang M.4/4 No.7. Introduction.

sai
Télécharger la présentation

The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition PreyananLarbanantaphol M.4/4 No.4 RatimaVangsawang M.4/4 No.7

  2. Introduction Before we memorize, we must receive information in brain. There are many methods to receive information such as; listening, watching, touching etc.

  3. Introduction The mind deals with various kinds of information. We also use language to think. but human memory holds other kinds of information too. For example, it can store information as mental pictures. The images can also be experienced in other sensory forms. A special kind of dynamic imagery is experienced like movies inside the head. You may be able to replay experiences from your past like a mental video(E.Martinez, 2006).

  4. cerebrum http://www.besthealth.com/besthealth/bodyguide/reftext/html/nerv_sys_fin.html http://sitysat.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!977D9156A7C78D2!500.entry

  5. Frontal lobe{ about Memory} http://www.strokesurvivors.ca/new/FrontalLobe.php

  6. Temporal lobe and Midbrain { about listening} http://benkimball.vox.com/library/post/qotd-time-travel.html

  7. Occipital lobe { about watching} http://www.strokesurvivors.ca/new/OccipitalLobe.php

  8. Introduction The purposes are to study about the relations between the method to receive information and the efficiency of memorability.

  9. Material and method • First, sampling the volunteers by random the students in MahidolWittayanusorn School, twenty men and twenty women in grade 10 and 11 participated in the study. Recording data, then analyze the data by using anova. Finally, draw a conclusion.

  10. Material and method • For data collecting, test the volunteers for 3 steps, the first step is letting these people remember a ten number ( two digit number ) given by watching within two seconds per number.

  11. Material and method • Ten seconds later, asking them to write the number as much as they can remember within one minute.

  12. Material and method • The next step is doing as the first step but change the method to given the numbers by leads participant listen.

  13. Material and method • For last step, participants were manipulated both watching and listening ( the numbers in each step is differently).

  14. 10 numbers • Ten numbers were chosen by random number program.

  15. Results

  16. Grade 10 between men and women

  17. Grade 11 between men and women

  18. Men and women

  19. Grade 10 and 11

  20. Grade 10 Between men and women • For SexH0 : There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points From F == = 2.0157166 Fα = 3.92433 If F > Fαthen reject H0 Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points

  21. Grade 10 Between men and women • For different sensational receptionH0 : There is no different between the variance of point from different sensation reception From F == = 16.99049 Fα = 3.92433 If F > Fαthen reject H0 Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of point from different sensation reception

  22. Grade 10 Between men and women • For Sex and different sensational receptionH0 : There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way From F == = 1.1385 Fα = 3.92433 If F > Fαthen reject H0 Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way

  23. Grade 11 Between men and women • For SexH0 : There is no difference between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points From F == = 4.1862 Fα = 3.92433 If F > Fαthen reject H0 Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points

  24. Grade 11 Between men and women • For different sensational receptionH0 : There is no different between the variance of point from different sensation reception From F == = 17.2591 Fα = 3.92433 If F > Fαthen reject H0 Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of point from different sensation reception

  25. Grade 11 Between men and women • For Sex and different sensational receptionH0 : There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way From F == = 2.8775 Fα = 3.92433 If F > Fαthen reject H0 Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way

  26. Men and women • For SexH0 : There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points From F == = 5.9206 Fα = 3.881505 If F > Fαthen reject H0 Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points

  27. Men and women • For different sensational receptionH0 : There is no different between the variance of point from different sensation reception From F == = 34.1747 Fα = 3.881505 If F > Fαthen reject H0 Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of point from different sensation reception

  28. Men and women • For Sex and different sensational receptionH0 : There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way From F == = 2.8775 Fα = 3.881505 If F > Fαthen reject H0 Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way

  29. Grade 10 and 11 • For GradeH0 : There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points From F == = 1.7945 Fα = 3.881505 If F > Fαthen reject H0 Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points

  30. Grade 10 and 11 • For different sensational receptionH0 : There is no different between the variance of point from different sensation reception From F == = 32.9144 Fα = 3.881505 If F > Fα then reject H0 Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of point from different sensation reception

  31. Grade 10 and 11 • For grade and different sensational receptionH0 : There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way From F == = 0.4105 Fα = 3.881505 If F > Fα then reject H0 Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way

  32. Results Table shows F-value of points in grade 10,grade 11 & men and women Table shows the different between the variance of points in grade 10, grade 11 & men and women

  33. results Table shows F-value of points in grade 10&11 Table shows the different between the variance of points in grade 10&11

  34. Conclusions and discussion • The difference of sensational reception affect the efficiency of memorability . The best way to receive information is watching, listening and both in order .

  35. Conclusions and discussion • However, in most studies in which verbal items have been rated, information about sex differences is scarce (e.g., Paivio et al., 1968; Rubin & Friendly, 1986).

  36. Acknowledgement • This mini project could not be successful without assistance and suggestions from Aj.UsaJeenjenkit, Aj.SirimardSukprasert, Aj.WashirasornSaengsuwanand Aj.PornmongkolJimlim. Thanks for our volunteers that make our project finish successfully.

  37. References • VadimKotelnikov (2009).The Way Our Mind Works. Retrieved from www.1000ventures. com/business.../mind_how-it-works.html • Lisa, C. &Murray, T. M. (2010). Verbaland Spatial Short-term Memory. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/conten t~db=all~content=a741927340 • Lisa, M. B., Jeanette, A. (2008). An investigation of sex differences in word ratings across concrete, abstract, and emotion words. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/ articles/mi_hb3538/is_3_58/ai_n29459215/

  38. REferences • Short-term memory (n.d.). In wikipedia. Retrieved 23 August 2010 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short- term_memory • Walter, J. F. (1991).The Physiology of Perception Retrieved from http://sulcus.berkeley.edu /FLM/MS/Physio.Percept.html

  39. Questions ??

More Related