220 likes | 347 Vues
This talk outlines the vital role of tidal energy within the broader context of renewable energies, especially in the face of global climate change. It discusses the motivation for pursuing tidal energy, the current state of the industry, and insights from experts like John Ferland of the Ocean Renewable Power Company. The talk also explores the challenges faced by tidal energy developers and the technological barriers that must be overcome. With a focus on a “Maine-centric” perspective, the importance of diversifying energy sources beyond traditional carbon-intensive options like fossil fuels is emphasized.
E N D
Outline of Talk • Motivation • Why don’t we just use ________________(fill in the blank) • The current state of the industry • John Ferland “P-guy” Ocean Renewable Power Company • There is stuff in the water • Other developers, technology and barrier issues
Global ClimateAnthropogenic CO2And the Role of Tidal and Alternative Energy A “Maine-Centric” Perspective Can’t we just use wind, solar, biomass, off-shore wind, nuclear, geothermal Michael “Mick” Peterson, Ph.D. UMaine Numbers and thinking by Anna Demeo UMaine & College of the Atlantic
World Situation…. • “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal “ 1 • “Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic (human) greenhouse gas concentrations.” 1 1Climate Change 2007: The Physical Sciences Basis, IPCC, <http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html>. Retrieved on 01-01-2007
Carbon Footprints…. • The average Portland resident emitted 0.908 tons of CO2 from residential fuels – highest in the country and 1.443 tons of CO2 from transportation • The average Los Angeles resident emitted 0.391tons of CO2 from residential energy use and 1.022 tons of CO2 from transportation So who has a problem! Portland Maine has a 66% higher per capita footprint
What if I don’t Care About Climate Change? • The first industry auction of carbon dioxide allowances already took place in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative • It's the first mandatory carbon regulatory venture in the United States. • Carbon in the northeast now has a value AND • Oil is expensive and comes from people who are not necessarily friendly
US and Maine Situation • 40.5 percent of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in the United States result from combustion of fossil fuels for electrical generation 2. • Maine electricity CURRENTLY averages 13.18 cents per kilowatt hour, >39% higher than the average for the U. S.3 • Over 80% of Maine homes heat with fuel oil, the highest in the nation • [2] Energy Information Administration, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 1998, Chapter 2, "Carbon Dioxide Emissions," DOE/EIA-0573(98) (Washington, DC, October 1999). • [3] Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly with data for September 2007http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_6_a.html retrieved 12-31-07
ME Sources of Residential Heathttp://tonto.eia.doe.gov/state/state_energy_profiles.cfm?sid=ME Fuel Oil = 80% Natural Gas = 4% Propane = 5% Electricity = 5% Wood/other = 6% The rest of the Northeast is less extreme, trends exist.
Energy Use for Residential Home Heating Mostly from friendly places though!
Energy Use: Heating Fuel 0.908 tons of CO2for each Maine Resident *Wood is often considered zero emissions **Source: Energy Information Administration: www.eia.doe.gov
Let’s Convert to Electric Heat Current Situation: Quantity: 15,610 thousand barrels of Oil for residential heating Cost: $4.2/gal = $2.75 billion CO2 Emissions: 14,675 million lbs Convert to heat pump w/ COP = 3 Quantity: 9309 million kWh for equivalent of Oil for residential heating Cost: $.1636/kWh = $1.52 billion CO2 Emissions: 10,649.5 million lbs *(1.144 lbs CO2/kWh) *figures based on National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory annual report Reduce Heating CO2 by 27% and price volatility… a lot of power
Cost of Heat Pumps • 425,000 households convert from fuel oil to heat pumps at $3500 (cost may vary) • One Time Cost:$1.5 Billion to convert to heat pumps • Yearly Fuel Savings: $4580/year/house … $1.94 Billion/year. • 27% reduction in CO2 from heating Result: Maine 40% higher not 132% higher than LA in residential CO2 Is this is too good to be true!! What is the catch?
Current Electricity Generation: Convert residential oil heat to electric heat with heat pump requires an additional 9.5 million kWh of annual electricity generation: What are the options? This is a lot of electricity If we do not consider generation demand will drive up costs
The Catch! Electric Power for Supply • We need to replace the oil with electricity • 9.5 million kWh of annual electricity • A 5 month heating season • More than 2.5 GWatts of Generating Capacity • Options • Nuclear • Wind • Water Power Everything else is in short supply and/or has a big carbon footprint! Carbon has a $$$ value now!
The Nuclear Option • We need >2.5 GWatts Capacity • This is more than 4 Vermont Yankee size plants (93% capacity factor!) • One 1.350GW nuclear reactor costs $6 - 9 Billion or $4500 - $6500 / kW (FLP and Review) • Your cost $11-16 Billion (plus heat pumps) • CO2 from nuclear* • 1,354 million lbs of CO2 vs. Oil at 10,649 million lbs • Nuclear plants emit almost no CO2 at point of generation but contribute from uranium preparation for the reactor including: mining, milling the ore, fuel enrichment and fuel-rod fabrication. • Greenpeace -- (.377 lbs CO2/kWh) Nuclear Industry 606 million lbs (.065 lbs CO2/kWh) • August 2008 issue of the peer-reviewed journal Energy Policy : http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2008/07/15/nuclear-power-a-false-solution-climate-change.html
Off-Shore Wind • Costs • Infrastructure needs, 60 miles off-shore cabling & 2.5 GWatt Capacity, $1.5 billion in cabling • Estimated installed Cost $1500-2500 kW, Real life: Arklow, GE Project in Ireland, $3600 kW* • Result: (45% Capacity) $3800 - $9000 kW (Ocean energy conference number $8000 kW) • Capital Costs -- $9-22 Billion • CO2 from off-shore wind* • More than a 95% reduction in CO2 vs. Oil • Wind plants emit no CO2 at point of generation but contribute from manufacturing, construction, maintenance and servicing costs. *50 million £ for 25 MWatts 10 km off-shore
We need an economic rescue $9-22 Billion in Investment This will solve the Maine CO2 Problem And our economic exposure The capital required for a simple fix does not exist We also need a fast solution even if it is partial
No Single Solution for Any of Us • Diversify our energy portfolio • Like a GOOD investor • Costing of options is CO2 plus capital • Nothing is too small to matter if it is robust • Can afford the capital costs • Can we make the system work • Our options • Tidal • Biomass • Terrestrial wind
Biomass/Heat Pump • Home heating solution • Heat pump for the warmer days • Pellet stove for the cold days • Perfect solution • Increased COP for heat pump, it is working when efficient • Pellet stove to keep up on the cold days, and uses our limited supply of wood when needed • Even in Maine need pellet stove 14 days per year • Well suited to “spot heating” • Results: lower carbon footprint, reduced capital demand
Terrestrial Wind • New England and Maine have wind resources consistent with utility-scale production in the following areas: • Ridges and crests of North-Central and Northwestern Maine • Presque Isle Area • Adirondacks • Etc…. • Nationally some keyresource areas • North Dakota – Underdeveloped grid • Texas – Fast developing • Great Plains • Will be up to 20% of US power over capacity factor and limits on location
Tidal Energy • In Maine250-400 MWatts in 1-5 years • Larger than terrestrial wind • A unique resource in Maine • One of the leading efforts in North America • Ocean Renewable Power Company: • Nascent research effort with Maine Maritime Academy and UMaine