1 / 8

Success of the ITU-T’s Alternative Approval Process (AAP)

Success of the ITU-T’s Alternative Approval Process (AAP). Gary Fishman ITU-T TSAG Chairman GSC-8 Ottawa, Canada 28 April – 1 May 2003. Overall View – TAP* Jan 2001 – 1 April 2003. 33 Recs DETERMINED 26 approved by SGs with 6 pending 1 not approved

saima
Télécharger la présentation

Success of the ITU-T’s Alternative Approval Process (AAP)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Success of the ITU-T’s Alternative Approval Process (AAP) Gary Fishman ITU-T TSAG Chairman GSC-8 Ottawa, Canada 28 April – 1 May 2003

  2. Overall View – TAP*Jan 2001 – 1 April 2003 • 33 Recs DETERMINED • 26 approved by SGs with 6 pending • 1 not approved • Average time from DETERMINATION to Notification of approval: 36 weeks *Traditional Approval Process GSC-8, Ottawa 28 April – 1 May 2003

  3. Overall View – AAP*Jan 2001 – 1 April 2003 • 445 Recommendations CONSENTED • 386 approved in Last Call with 18 pending • 30 approved in Additional Review with 4 pending • 4 approved by SGs with 2 pending • 3 not approved (2 approved later by TAP) • Average time from CONSENT to Notification of approval: 9 weeks *Alternative Approval Process GSC-8, Ottawa 28 April – 1 May 2003

  4. Comparison of TAP & AAP • 93% of Recommendations put into an approval process used AAP (2001- 88%; 2002 - 96%; thru 1 April 2003 - 99%) • Of these 478 Recommendations, approval has failed in only 2 cases: • One was withdrawn • One was discontinued GSC-8, Ottawa 28 April – 1 May 2003

  5. Transition from TAP to AAP -INPUTS • No. of Recs DETERMINED is decreasing - TAP • No. of Recs CONSENTED is increasing - AAP Recommendations put into an approval process GSC-8, Ottawa 28 April – 1 May 2003

  6. Transition from TAP to AAP –OUTPUTS • Clearing out the TAP pipeline has been done • Almost all approved Recs now use AAP Recommendations Approved GSC-8, Ottawa 28 April – 1 May 2003

  7. AAP Approval Distribution GSC-8, Ottawa 28 April – 1 May 2003

  8. AAP Cost Savings2001 - 2004 For ITU • Not mailing Recs for SG approval reduces mailing costs ~ 0.5 M sF • Calculation of Recommendation repro cost reduction ~ 0.5 M sF • About 100 000 fewer TAP Circulars mailed For membership • Reduce time-to-market by 6 months • All-electronic process GSC-8, Ottawa 28 April – 1 May 2003

More Related