SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Computational Fluid Dynamics 5 Final Thoughts

sally avatar
12 diapositives · 365 Views · Aug 10, 2014

Computational Fluid Dynamics 5 Final Thoughts. Professor William J Easson School of Engineering and Electronics The University of Edinburgh. Things you can do. Create simple geometries in Star-Design

Computational Fluid Dynamics 5 Final Thoughts - slide 1
01 / 12Computational Fluid Dynamics 5 Final Thoughts
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Computational Fluid Dynamics 5 Final Thoughts
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Computational Fluid Dynamics 5Final Thoughts Professor William J Easson School of Engineering and Electronics The University of Edinburgh

  2. Things you can do • Create simple geometries in Star-Design • Produce meshes of different densities and of varying density (by changing the parameters before meshing) • Solve for laminar flow in a 2D channel • Present the output in a variety of formats • Solve for 2D laminar jets • Solve for 2D flows with wall attachment • Solve to 1st & 2nd order simulations (check this) • Test the appropriateness of your mesh density (check) • Test the appropriateness of the extent of your domain

  3. Things you can do • Simulate steady, turbulent flow • Simulate flow past objects in a domain • Calculate the drag coefficient using the sum of forces on an object in a flow • Determine whether flow solution is dominated by hyperbolic, parabolic or elliptic behaviour • Utilise time-dependant equations to enhance convergence for elliptically-dominated solutions • Adapt grids to improve local resolution of flow • Simulate time-dependant laminar flow past a cylinder (vortex shedding) • Estimate simulation results through extrapolation

  4. Stuff Sources: Starccm+ Help pages Versteeg/Anderson/colleagues

  5. Convergence • My simulation won’t converge • are my units correct? • am I using the correct category of models for the flow? • is my grid too heavily skewed or too fine/coarse ? • My simulation partially converges • am I using the best sub-class of models? • is my solution time-dependent? • My simulation still won’t converge • is the domain dominated by elliptical solutions? • can I use a time-dependent flow to reach steady-state solution?

  6. Relaxation • The relaxation governs the rate at which the solution is approached. Too fast can lead to over-shoot and instability. • Finite-difference schemes - over-relaxation • calculate the difference to the next value and multiply by a factor >1, typically up to 1.9 for well-behaved solutions • this speeds up convergence • Finite-volume schemes - under-relaxation • multiply predicted difference by a factor <1, actual value depends on variable • lower value can stabilise convergence, especially in the early stages

  7. solver formulation • segregated solver • equations solved sequentially • roots in incompressible flows • coupled solver • momentum, continuity (& energy) equations solved simultaneously • roots in compressible flows

  8. Turbulence modelling • The turbulence models in STAR-CCM+are responsible for providing closure of the governing equations in turbulent flows. • This section first provides general overviews of: • Selecting a turbulence modeling approach • Using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models • Using large eddy simulation (LES) • Using detached eddy simulation (DES) • Using wall treatment models

  9. Abe-Kondoh-Nagano, better for complex low Re Satisfies the Physics of turbulence Original and still used often What it says on the tin! Allows low y+ values Better for near-wall turbulence with separation

  10. Steps • What do I think will be the outcome? • Order of magnitude calculation • What can be expected of CFD? • What are the appropriate models? • Do a literature search • Now model