100 likes | 238 Vues
This discussion explores the relationship between claims and evidence in the context of debate and argumentation. A claim is the central thesis an arguer aims to persuade the audience to accept, supported by evidence. It addresses the potential for exceptions—situations where the claim may not apply. A well-reasoned exception can enhance an argument's credibility. Moreover, claims can support further claims and motions, creating a layered structure of reasoning in debates. Understanding these components is crucial for effective argumentation.
E N D
China Debate Education Network: Claims, Evidence, Exceptions and Motions
A claim is the main point or the thesis of an argument. Arguers try to convince audiences and adjudicators to accept their claims. Claims are based on or supported by evidence(see next slide) Claims and Evidence
Sometimes Claims have Exceptions • An exception is a statement that indicates a situation to which the arguer believes the general claim does not apply.
Exceptions (Continued) • The arguer needs to have a good reason why the exception is reasonable and does not violate the belief in the claim generally.
Claims can Support Further Claims • Evidence can be used to support a claim, which can then be used to support a subsequent claim.
Claims Can Support Motions • Evidence can support a claim (or claims), which can then be used to support a motion.