1 / 4

ACCI Task Force Status

ACCI Task Force Status. Barry I. Schneider Program Director, Office of CyberInfrastructure January 20, 2011. Software: David Keyes, Columbia/KAUST (MPS). Grand Challenge Communities/ VOs : Tinsley Oden , Austin (ENG). Data & Viz : Shenda Baker, Harvey Mudd (MPS); Tony Hey, (CISE).

sauda
Télécharger la présentation

ACCI Task Force Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ACCI Task Force Status Barry I. Schneider Program Director, Office of CyberInfrastructure January 20, 2011

  2. Software: David Keyes, Columbia/KAUST (MPS) Grand Challenge Communities/VOs: Tinsley Oden, Austin (ENG) Data & Viz: Shenda Baker, Harvey Mudd (MPS); Tony Hey, (CISE) Campus Bridging: Craig Stewart, IU (BIO) Education & Workforce: Alex Ramirez, CEOSE Computing: Thomas Zacharia, ORNL/UTK (DOE) ACCI Task Force Findings and Recommendations 2

  3. CIF21 Task Force Activities 6 • 6 CI Task Forces established in 2008 • Grand Challenges and VO • Software • HPC • Data • Campus Bridging • Learning & Workforce Development • 14 workshops; 5 BOFs; more than 30 phone conferences • 3 more workshops and 1 more BOF before Dec • Over 1230 researchers involved to date • Final reports are being published • Interim results and recommendations being provided

  4. GCC & VO: Overarching Recommendations & Suggestions Permanent programmatic activities in CDS&E should be established within NSF. These activities should range from division- and directorate-level programs for discipline-specific aspects of CS&E, to permanent NSF-wide cross-cutting CS&E programs possibly managed by OCI. Interdisciplinary projects could be co-funded between cross-cutting and relevant disciplinary programs…. • CS&E generally “falls through the cracks” in the current organizational structure of the National Science Foundation • Numerous federally-commissioned reports support the need for cyberinfrastructure for CS&E • There are over 125 programs in CS&E fostered by universities across the country (based on a recent SIAM study). • The CS&E discipline is of fundamental importance in the CF21 initiative: Cyberinfrastructure Framework for 21st Century Science and Engineering

More Related