1 / 7

Simplifying IPv4 Initial Allocations: ARIN Draft Policy 2010-5

The ARIN Draft Policy 2010-5 proposes to reduce the minimum IPv4 allocation size from /22 to /23. ISPs receiving less than a /20 allocation from ARIN will need to renumber if they return for additional space. Unlike other RIRs, which maintain a minimum of /22 (AfriNIC, APNIC, LACNIC) or /21 (RIPE NCC), this policy aims to address the unique challenges faced by ARIN's ISPs, particularly smaller single-homed users worried about future allocations. The policy has sparked discussions within the community, highlighting differing perspectives on its implications.

scout
Télécharger la présentation

Simplifying IPv4 Initial Allocations: ARIN Draft Policy 2010-5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reduce and Simplify IPv4 Initial Allocations Draft Policy 2010-5

  2. 2010-5 - History AC Shepherds: Heather Schiller Robert Seastrom

  3. 2010-5 – Summary(Reduce and Simplify IPv4 Initial Allocations) Reduces IPv4 minimum allocation from /22 to /23 ISPs receiving less than a /20 from ARIN must renumber if they come back to request additional space

  4. 2010-5 – Status at other RIRs(Reduce and Simplify IPv4 Initial Allocations) Draft policy is unique to ARIN Current policy: AfriNIC /22 minimum APNIC /22 minimum LACNIC /22 minimum RIPE NCC /21 minimum

  5. 2010-5 – Staff Assessment • Assessment available: • Discussion Guide • http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2010-February/016711.html

  6. 2010-5 – PPML Discussion Earlier proposal discussion 38 posts by 10 People 2 in favor, 1 against “…the small single-homers who are currently tied to LIR-assignments that they are afraid will go away post-IPv4 runout, are EXTREMELY unhappy about things as it is now - and would be overjoyed to get anything at all - like this proposal.” “I think the most important thing you can convey to your customers is that renumbering is inevitable, no matter what ISP they select. ”

  7. Reduce and Simplify IPv4 Initial Allocations Draft Policy 2010-5

More Related