1 / 9

Recent Parametric Instability Modeling

Recent Parametric Instability Modeling. Bill Kells Caltech LIGO. PI “ R ” calculation from entire cavity field. Previous : model arm cavity field as discreet SHOs Cavity specific modes {j}, Q j , L jm need accurate specification Proves difficult for modest order HTMs: high loss/distortion

shaman
Télécharger la présentation

Recent Parametric Instability Modeling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Recent Parametric Instability Modeling Bill Kells Caltech LIGO G070145-00-Z

  2. PI “R” calculation from entire cavity field • Previous: model arm cavity field as discreet SHOs • Cavity specific modes {j}, Qj, Ljm need accurate specification • Proves difficult for modest order HTMs: high loss/distortion • Is a significant “background” PI missed (K. Thorne, W. Kells: aS ~cancels S)? • Now: build on FFT tool, ideally suited to net SS field from <<l static distortions (acoustic surface amplitude from FEA) • Instead of SB(+/- fm) modes: FFT cavity length shifted by for proper Stokes (a-Stokes) simulation. Each acoustic {m} a-Stokes Braginsky, Vyatchanin Stokes G070145-00-Z

  3. f Gouy (FSR)/p 2 FSR FSR R See T060207 & suppl. Acoustic mode frequency FFT “R” values: AdvLIGO arm • Complete RS-RaS for AdvLIGO arm FEA generated {m}: fm to few % No flats, ears, wedge ~only 6 R>1 No anomalous “background” All high R values correspond to known HTMs Simple cases agree with analytic & previous results G070145-00-Z

  4. Full Ifo: essential Features • Single arm only • PI gain strongly depends on Qm and Qj • For AdL this limits plausible {m} to fm<90kHz, ~3-4000 Stokes dominated modes • Above at least 6th order {j} cavity loss too high • 1st order (tilt) and perhaps 2nd order (curvature) special (control possible). • PRC only (AdL parameters) • ~10x recycling enhancement of PI gain. However: • This peaking is ~10x narrower (+/-2 Hz tune of PI mode from arm res.) • Arms must have nearly same Gouy phase (D ROC <1-2m) • No enhancement (over arm alone PI gain) for > 3d order Pi modes (too lossy) • PRC + SRC (AdL parameters) LIGO-T060159 & G060475 (Braginsky, Vyatchanin, et al TBP) • Peak gain enhancements (& widths) < PRC alone. • Significant “pulling” of peaks with SRC phasing (GW detuning + Gouy multiplet) • Certain phases are dangerous: D ROCarm “protection” obviated Complete survey Via FFT simulation G070145-00-Z

  5. ½ x contour 1x 10x 4x 2x Recycled tuning landscape 3d order PI arm mode 1st order PI arm mode 8x contour Arm-Arm D ROC=1m 2x contour Arm-Arm D ROC=1m Arms identical Other arm PI mode detuning Hz PRC alone (unstable) 1x contour SRC detune=.983p (AdL nominal) detune=.95p detune=.8p PI arm detuning Hz detune=.5p, .8p , .9p detune=.5p (same as PRC) G070145-00-Z

  6. PI gain normalized to single arm value Even modes > 5x suppression Other arm tune Hz .01 ~10 max .1 1 .04 .5 .02 .2 Odd modes PI arm tune Hz Fine Tuning !? • Incorporating SRC/PRC stability DOF, can AdLIGO optics configuration be “tuned” to mitigate PI? • Generally: no. Special case: confocal PRC + DROC large (D. Ottaway) can suppress all PI mode gains of concern large factor below single arm value. G070145-00-Z

  7. Arm alone d=0 Arms+PRC d=0 PI gain relative to Dw=0 arm alone PRC+SRC (detune=.8p) d=200 Hz; Dw shifted 10.3 Hz PI arm detuning Hz PI gain widths ! • SRC increases enhancement ridge “area” in 2 arm tuning • Large SRC Gouy phase range leaves ridge unavoidable for allowed DROC • However, width of ridge is also critical ! Likelihood of “hitting” enhancement: ~(enhancement width)/FSR =4Hz/38kHz x ~6000/2 acoustic modes x 4 TM x 2-3 HTMs = order 3 probable cases • Already PRC reduces width factor 2 • SRC narrows further, so may actually be Advantageous if a very few exact resonances can be avoided (e.g. thermal tuning) G070145-00-Z

  8. gain =6 Arg[r]=0.94p Arg[r]=0.8p d (Hz) d (Hz) D (Hz) D (Hz) G070145-00-Z

  9. D (Hz) G070145-00-Z

More Related