1 / 15

Approximate Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning for Nonlinear Optimal Control of Power Systems

Ronald Harley Georgia Institute of Technology ECS-0231632 ECS-0080764. Kumar Venayagamoorthy University of Missouri-Rolla. Approximate Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning for Nonlinear Optimal Control of Power Systems. November 4, 2003.

shamus
Télécharger la présentation

Approximate Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning for Nonlinear Optimal Control of Power Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ronald Harley Georgia Institute of Technology ECS-0231632 ECS-0080764 Kumar Venayagamoorthy University of Missouri-Rolla Approximate Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning for Nonlinear Optimal Control of Power Systems November 4, 2003

  2. Adaptive Critic Design: Nonlinear Optimal Control Model Network Utility Plant (Identifier) U Informaton Function ( ) : To learn the dynamics of plant Optimal cost-to-go J function ( ) Critic Networks : To minimize the value (of derivatives) Plant J of with respect to the states Control Derivatives via BP Action Network : To find optimal control Model Network u Reinforcement Learning

  3. STATCOM Control

  4. Simulation Results 100ms SC at PCC, Line Voltage , Generator Terminal Voltage

  5. Optimal control for FACTS devicesInternal control forstatic series synchronous compensator (SSSC) The simplified schematic of the SSSC (160 MVA, 15KV VL-L)

  6. PI Based internal controller (CONVC) for the SSSC Publication: N.G. Hingorani and L. Gyugyi, “Understanding FACTS-Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems”, IEEE Press, New York, 2000. Optimal control for FACTS devicesInternal control forSSSC (CONVC)

  7. Rotor angle Optimal control for FACTS devicesCase study: 100 ms three phase short circuit test at receiving-end (infinite-bus)

  8. Optimal control for FACTS devicesExternal control forseries capacitive reactance compensator (SCRC) Schematic single-line diagram showing an SCRC with external controller (160 MVA, 15KV VL-L)

  9. v v r s Line #1 x r e1 v i e1 Turbine- c s Line #2 Governor x r e2 e2 Synchronous Inf. bus AVR - Generator Voltage Exciter * X Source C Inverter GTO D w + DHP based + Internal Control S external controller X + D of SCRC X C C (DHPEC) V dc SCRC Optimal control for FACTS devicesDHP based external controller (DHPEC) Schematic single-line diagram showing the DHP based external controller (DHPEC)

  10. Speed deviation Optimal control for FACTS devicesCase study: Step changes X*C [pu]

  11. Application in Multi-Machine power system Large-scale multi-machine power system

  12. Governor 1 2 Vr UPFC Synch Generator V1 V2 Pref Turbine Z1 Z1 R2, L2 R1, L1 Pout, Qout Infinite Bus Series Inverter Shunt Inverter Exciter Vdc - V1ref AVR +  Q ref V1 Shunt Inverter Control Series Inverter Control V1ref Qerr Verr  Qinj Vdcerr Perr Vdc   epd Neurocontroller Pinj Vdc ed Q Neurocontroller Vdcref V Neuroidentifier epq eq Pref Neuroidentifier P A UPFC in the POWER SYSTEM

  13. 250 250 200 200 ) ) 150 150 ° ° 100 100 Load Angle( Load Angle( 50 50 0 0 UPFC UPFC NC PI PI PI - - 50 50 1.1 1.1 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 Time (sec) Time (sec) 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.06 Speed (Pu) 1.04 1.04 Speed (pu) 1.02 1.02 1 1 0.98 0.98 NC UPFC UPFC PI PI PI 0.96 0.96 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 Time (sec) Time (sec) Responses of the Generator for a 180 ms 3- phase Short Circuit at bus 2 at P=0.8 p.u & Q=0.15 p.u Load angle Speed response

  14. Micro-Machine Research Lab. at the University of Natal, Durban, South Africa

  15. Gen. #1: Trans. Line Impedance Increase 1.01 1 Terminal voltage in pu 0.99 CONV_CONV 0.98 CONV_PSS_CONV 0.97 DHP_CONV 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 Time in seconds 40 35 Load angle in degrees CON_CONV 30 CONV_PSS_CONV 25 DHP_CONV 20 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 Time in seconds

More Related