1 / 28

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning. Pages 402-413 Jason Buatte and Kathy Rey. Introduction to Deductive Reasoning. Thinking Deductive Reasoning vs. Decision Making. Deductive Reasoning and Cognitive Development. Jean Piaget

shanae
Télécharger la présentation

Deductive Reasoning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Deductive Reasoning Pages 402-413 Jason Buatte and Kathy Rey

  2. Introduction to Deductive Reasoning • Thinking • Deductive Reasoning vs. Decision Making

  3. Deductive Reasoning and Cognitive Development • Jean Piaget • Jean Piaget’s theory states there are basically four levels of cognitive development. • Sensori-Motor: birth to age 2 • Pre-Operational: age 2 – age 6 • Concrete Operational: age 6 – age 12 • Formal Operational: age 12 – adulthood

  4. Concrete Operations and Deductive Reasoning • The third and fourth stages of Piaget’s model are the most related to deductive reasoning. • Stage 3 (Concrete Operations) – logical reasoning replaces intuitive thought. • Stage 4 (Formal Operations) – children are now able to hypothesize, and think about the future and what they can be as well as what direction they can go.

  5. Deductive Reasoning • Conditional Reasoning • Also referred to as propositional reasoning.

  6. Conditional Reasoning • Propositional Calculus • Categorizing the kind of reasoning • Antecedent – statement/proposition that comes first (the “if” statement). • Affirm Antecedent • Deny Antecedent

  7. Conditional Reasoning • Propositional Calculus • Categorizing the kind of reasoning • Consequent – proposition that follows; the consequence (the “then” statement). • Affirm Consequent • Deny Consequent

  8. Syllogisms • Three statements: Two we assume are true, and one conclusion. • View this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjJdcXA1KH8

  9. Difficulties with Negative Information • People handle positive information better than negative information • People have trouble processing sentences with negative words (i.e. not, no, never)

  10. Abstract Reasoning Problems • People do better with examples that are concrete vs. abstract.

  11. Belief-Bias Effect • Making judgments based on prior beliefs and general knowledge • This rule is not absolute • Republicans vs. Democrats • Do you think that everyone should vote a certain way, or do you think it is their choice?

  12. Belief - Bias and Semantic Knowledge • Example: A friend of mine had a student in 2nd grade. She was teaching that police officers are good and keep us safe. A student raised her hand and started crying. She said she was very afraid of police officers and that police officers are bad. Why? The only encounter that this student had with police officers was when they came and hauled her father off to jail.

  13. Schemas are impacted by Belief - Bias • As in the previous example, the little girl’s schema and script about law enforcement officials is now and probably will always be, negative. She saw the police beat down her door and have to use force to take her daddy away. She was scared and upset, therefore, she now looks at police in a negative light.

  14. Confirmation Bias Effect • People would rather confirm something is true rather than disprove it. • If this is an apple, then this is a fruit.

  15. Confirmation Bias and Long Term / Semantic Memory • The Confirmation Bias has a direct impact on our Long Term Memory as well as our Semantic Memory. • Decisions that we make are influenced by our semantic knowledge. • Our semantic knowledge and long term memory is in direct correlation with our biases and beliefs.

  16. Confirmation Bias and Feature Comparison Models • The Feature Comparison theory states that people store concepts in their memory according to a list of necessary features. • People use a decision process to make judgments about these concepts. • Example: True or False….Baseball is a sport.

  17. Confirmation Bias Experiments • Wason Selection Task • http://coglab.wadsworth.com/experiments/WasonSelection.shtml

  18. Our Confirmation Bias Experiment • We hypothesized that teenagers might disprove this theory because of their rebellious nature. Many teens are interested in proving something wrong. • First you get to try…then we will reveal our results!

  19. Directions • Follow these directions on the following slide: • On the back of the cards with a sport, there is a gender. • On the back of the cards with a gender, there is a sport. • Choose one card that you would flip to see if the following statement is true.

  20. Soccer Boy If a student plays soccer, that student is a girl. Which would you flip? Girl Volleyball

  21. Directions • Follow these directions on the following slide: • On the back of the cards with a grade level, there is a sport. • On the back of the cards with a sport, there is a grade level. • Choose one card that you would flip to see if the following statement is true.

  22. Senior Junior If a student plays football, that student is a senior. Which would you flip? Volleyball Football

  23. Directions • Follow these directions on the following slide: • On the back of the cards with an age, there is a school club. • On the back of the cards with a school club, there is an age. • Choose one card that you would flip to see if the following statement is true.

  24. 15 years 17 years If a student is a member of student council, that student is over 15. Which would you flip? Student Council Member Spanish Club Member

  25. How did you do? • If you chose soccer, football and student council, you have proven the Confirmation Bias to be correct. • If you chose girl, senior or 15 years, you were trying to disprove this statement.

  26. Our Results • We were wrong! • We surveyed 75 students grades 9-12. • 53% Confirmed the first statement • 52% Confirmed the second statement • 56% Confirmed the third statement

  27. Summary • Given a hypothesis, people try to confirm rather than disprove. • Negative statements require deeper thinking. • Concrete examples are easier than abstract examples to solve. • Prior knowledge and experiences influence reasoning.

  28. References • Madruga, J. A. G., Moreno, S., Carriedo, N., Gutiérrez, F. (2000). Deductive Reasoning and Strategies. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. • Matlin, Margaret W. (2005). Cognition. Danvers, MA: Wiley and Sons. • Plucker, J. A. (Ed.). (2003). Human intelligence: Historical influences, current controversies, teaching resources. Retrieved [October 30, 2008], from http://www.indiana.edu/~intell/piaget.shtml) • http://www.essortment.com/all/piagetjeancogn_rkje.htm • ftp://ftp.prenhall.com/pub/esm/web_marketing/GagliostrS/ashcraft/ch11.doc • www.youtube.com

More Related