1 / 4

Mark Watson

IETF77, March 21-26 2010, Anaheim, CA, USA FECFRAME draft-ietf-fecframe-framework-07 draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-02 draft-ietf-fecframe-rtp-raptor-03. Mark Watson. d raft-ietf-fecframe-framework-07. Address comments from Vincent and Orly Improve terminology (e.g. “ADU”)

shanon
Télécharger la présentation

Mark Watson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IETF77, March 21-26 2010, Anaheim, CA, USAFECFRAMEdraft-ietf-fecframe-framework-07draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-02draft-ietf-fecframe-rtp-raptor-03 Mark Watson

  2. draft-ietf-fecframe-framework-07 • Address comments from Vincent and Orly • Improve terminology (e.g. “ADU”) • Define text syntax for FEC Scheme-specific configuration elements • E.g. “a:5,t:64” • Implies additional requirement on FEC Schemes to define names, types and text encodings for individual FEC Scheme-specific configuration elements • Update various references • Complete WGLC now ?

  3. draft-ieft-fecframe-raptor-02 • Add FEC Schemes for RaptorQ • Address comments from Vincent • Define individual scheme-specific configuration elements as per new framework (“Kmax”, “T”, “P”) • Define two formats for FEC Source and Repair Payload IDs (Format A and Format B) to accommodate RaptorQ • Ready for WGLC ?

  4. draft-ietf-fecframe-rtp-raptor-03 • Address comments from Vincent and Colin • Align with fecframe-raptor updates for RaptorQ • Add and define rate parameter • Better explain definition-by-reference of payload contents • Add text on SDP mapping, offer-answer and declarative SDP considerations • Explain absence of specific security requirements • Ready for WGLC ? Needs review in AVT

More Related