1 / 40

Hemisphere Asymmetries

Hemisphere Asymmetries. Can asymmetries be explained in terms of general dichotomy?. Hemisphere Asymmetries. Spatial Frequency Hypothesis. Sergent (1982) Left hemisphere more adept at processing high spatial frequency information

shea-oneill
Télécharger la présentation

Hemisphere Asymmetries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hemisphere Asymmetries • Can asymmetries be explained in terms of general dichotomy?

  2. Hemisphere Asymmetries

  3. Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Sergent (1982) • Left hemisphere more adept at processing high spatial frequency information • Right hemisphere more adept at processing low spatialfrequency information

  4. Spatial Frequencies Low Medium High

  5. Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Sergent (1982) • Left hemisphere more adept at processing high spatial frequency information • Right hemisphere more adept at processing low spatialfrequency information • Receptive field size • Small in left hemisphere • Large in right hemisphere

  6. Retinotopic Organization

  7. Retinotopic Organization

  8. Small Receptive Field

  9. Large Receptive Field

  10. Visual Receptive Fields • On center / off surround • Accentuates edges

  11. Visual Receptive Fields

  12. Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Kitterle et al. (1990) • Present sinusoidal gratings to left and right hemisphere using divided-visual field • Decide whether grating is wide or narrow Wide Narrow

  13. Spatial Frequency Hypothesis

  14. Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Kitterle et al. (1990) Response time (ms) Hemisphere

  15. Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Kitterle et al. (1990) • Present sinusoidal gratings to left and right hemisphere using divided-visual field • Decide whether grating is wide or narrow • Faster at narrow than wide in left hemisphere

  16. But Wait… • Does this mean that hemispheres are more or less adept depending on the size of the stimulus? • In early visual areas, yes • In later visual areas, no • Size information is processed separately from shape information in high-level vision areas • Receptive fields receive information from other neurons

  17. Receptive Fields

  18. Receptive Fields

  19. Hemisphere Asymmetries • Split-brain patients • Language in left • Spatial in right • Asymmetric brain damage • Associative agnosias (Farah, 1991) • Abstract/parts in left • Specific/wholes in right • Divided-visual field with normal subjects • Categorical vs. coordinate (Kosslyn et al., 1989) • Local vs. global (Van Kleeck, 1989) • Abstract vs. specific (Marsolek, 1995, 1999)

  20. Local vs. Global Unfiltered Low-pass filtered (No high frequencies) High-pass filtered (No low frequencies)

  21. Spatial Relationships

  22. Spatial Relationships

  23. Spatial Relationships

  24. Spatial Relationships • Low frequency information may be insufficient for above-below decision when dot is close to line • Left hemisphere better at categorical judgments than right because high frequency information is needed in the close condition

  25. Receptive Field Size • Large receptive fields can overlap with each other • Allows coding of very specific information • Allows effective coding of wholes

  26. Large Receptive Fields

  27. Small Receptive Fields

  28. Receptive Field Size • Large receptive fields can overlap with each other • Allows coding of very specific information • Allows effective coding of wholes • Small receptive fields cannot overlap as much • Does not allow coding of very specific information • Allows effective coding of parts

  29. Wait…What About Faces?

  30. Wait…What About Faces?

  31. Wait…What About Faces? • Pascalis et al. (1995) • 4-day old infants look longer at mother’s face than at stranger • Can recognize face • Infants cannot resolve high spatial frequencies

  32. Wait…What About Faces?

  33. Postnatal Vision: < 1 Month

  34. Postnatal Vision: 3 Months

  35. Postnatal Vision: 6 Months

  36. Wait…What About Faces? • Pascalis et al. (1995) • 4-day old infants look longer at mother’s face than at stranger • Can recognize face • Infants cannot resolve high spatial frequencies • Low spatial frequencies suffice for face recognition

  37. Speech Comprehension • Understanding streams of spoken words requires processing high-temporal frequencies • Left hemisphere adept with high-temporal frequencies • Left hemisphere better than right at spoken word comprehension • Comprehending prosody requires processing low-temporal frequencies • Right hemisphere adept with low-temporal frequencies • Right hemisphere better than left at prosodic comprehension

  38. Hemisphere Asymmetries • Split-brain patients • Language in left • Spatial in right • Asymmetric brain damage • Associative agnosias (Farah, 1991) • Abstract/parts in left • Specific/wholes in right • Divided-visual field with normal subjects • Categorical vs. coordinate (Kosslyn et al., 1989) • Local vs. global (Van Kleeck, 1989) • Abstract vs. specific (Marsolek, 1995, 1999) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

  39. Many, Many More… • Emotion • Expressing, perceiving • RH > LH • Valence • RH = negative; LH = positive • Action • RH = withdraw; LH = approach • Stereotyping • LH > RH • Music • RH > LH

  40. Asymmetries in Non-Humans • Chickens and pigeons • Left hemisphere advantage for categorizing food vs. non-food items • Right hemisphere advantage for learning exact location of food source • Macaque monkey • Left hemisphere lesions impair comprehension of vocalizations by other macaques • Right hemisphere lesions impair face discrimination

More Related