310 likes | 422 Vues
Explore the transformative impact of Consumer-Directed Healthcare (CDHC) on the American healthcare system. This innovative approach empowers patients to make informed healthcare decisions, incentivizes healthy behaviors, and shares economic consequences among members. As traditional models fail to control costs, CDHC represents a new paradigm by allowing patients to take on the role of both consumer and payer. Learn about the successes in reducing healthcare costs and improving patient satisfaction, and discover its potential applications in other countries.
E N D
Consumer Directed Healthcare The Next American Revolution
Why are We Here? • New Health Benefit Model in US • impacts employers with US ops • may impact PMI: UK & elsewhere • may be model for future benefit developments in other nations
Healthcare, US Style • Medicare (over 65 & disabled) • Medicaid (low income) • Employer Sponsored (workers) • Employers pay c. 70% of cost • Employer sets benefits • Employer chooses carrier
The History of US Healthcare • No Insurance (<1945) • Indemnified Care (‘45 - ‘90) • Doctors rule • Managed Care (‘70 - ‘00) • Insurers rule • Consumer Directed Care • Patients rule
Why the old models failed? • After 1945, the person purchasing the care was no longer the person paying for the care!
Enter CDHC • Unleashing the power of free market economics on the health care delivery system
Why CDHC Works • Members share in the economic consequences of their health and healthcare buying decisions.
What is a CDHC Plan? • ANY health plan, so far as it... • empowers patients • shares economic consequences • rewards good health • promotes consumerism • provides health/healthcare tools • improves healthcare quality
CDHC: The Premises • A free market can’t work unless the consumer is also the payer • Healthcare costs won’t moderate until patients shop for care like they would for a car or TV • The best way to cut healthcare costs is for people to get healthier
Sample CDHC Plan • Plan pays first $1,000 @ 100% • Health Reimbursement Account: HRA • Patient pays next $500 @ 100% • plus 20% of $2,500 thereafter • maximum patient cost = $1,000 • Plan pays the balance in full • 100% of claims > $4,000
How HRA Works • Any HRA funds ($1,000) not spent by the patient in the first year automatically roll over to the next year and are added to that year’s HRA contirbution.
The Results • 70% of patients get 100% coverage • after office visit & Rx co-pays • + they roll over funds to year 2 • average rollover = c. $500 • 20% of patients spend < $1,000 • 10% of patients spend $1,000
3 “Plans” for 3 Populations • < $1,000 claims = “healthy” • wellness tools & incentives • $1,000 - $4,000 = “transitional” • claim cost sharing incentive • > $4,000 = “unhealthy” • disease management • quality of care initiatives
Cost per Population Group • 70% of members = 15% of claims • 20% of members = 20% of claims • 10% of members = 65% of claims
Group #1: Prevention • Keep 70% of members healthy • Cover healthcare 100% • build a “benefit bank” (HRA) • subsidize fitness activities • Online & onsite wellness programs • seminars on stress management • exercise programs
Group #2: Cost Sharing • $500 “cold shower” • $2,500 cost sharing corridor • $1,000 member liability
Group #2: Intervention • Side-by-side Rx drug comparison • Median cost of procedure by area • Health libraries & data bases • Personal Health Risk Assessment • follow-up with opt-in, targeted e-mail • Weight loss/Smoking cessation
Group #3: Management • Personal Health Coach • Disease Management Programs • Absence Management • focuses on return to work • cuts health costs 20% • Online Second Opinions (no cost)
Disease Management: Asthma • 1.5 million work days lost • $14 billion of lost productivity • 33% improvement in drug use • 50% reduction in hospital visits
Online 2nd Opinions • Partners Telemedicine • Specialists @ Harvard Medical • Boston area teaching hospitals • No cost to patient • Online registration • Opinion delivered in 5 days
2nd Opinion: Results • 5%: Diagnosis Reversed • Patient doesn’t have the disease s/he’s being treated for • 85%: Change Recommended • Specialist suggests a more effective or less invasive approach
2nd Opinion: Cost Savings • 10% of patients = 65% of claims • 5% of those don’t have disease • Potential savings = 3% • If 85% save 25%; savings = 14% • Plus: claims cost only = 1/3rd of the real cost of illness • lost productivity
Old Economic Model • Highest quality = Highest cost • works for cars • works for electronics • works for consumer goods • does NOT work for healthcare
New Economic Model • Highest Quality = Lowest Cost! • less unnecessary treatment • fewer “do-overs” • fewer unforced complications • shorter disabilities/absences • more complete recovery • return to greater productivity
Example: Chemotherapy • 40% less effective each try • Cost per positive outcome: • 1st time: 1x • 2nd time: 3x • 3rd time: 10x
CDHC Success To Date • Still largely anecdotal • 50% of employers plan to move some or all of their employees to a CDHC plan by the end of 2005 • High level of employee satisfaction • Employer reported savings: 4% to 11%
Application #1: US • Multi-national employers with operations in US • Need CDHC plan to compete • recruiting employees • employee productivity & morale • cost control
Application #2: UK (PMI) • Purchase contract with high excess • can reduce premium up to 30% • Allocate funds to HRAs • Beware the tax! • HRA payouts would be taxable • cheaper to pay tax on premium? • More incentive to build bank?
Application #3: World • Model for health benefit reform • New Economic Model • control cost by raising quality • Politically acceptable cost shift
THANK YOU David Cowles Co-founder & Principal Benemax www.benemax.com