SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Module 6: cost of capital & Valuation Company: chipotle

sian avatar
25 diapositives · 484 Views · Aug 02, 2014

Module 6: cost of capital & Valuation Company: chipotle. Matt Ramirez. Chipotle background. Mexican grill that focuses on serving quality food while maintaining speed and efficiency Found in 1993 by Steve Ells in Denver, Colorado

Module 6: cost of capital & Valuation Company: chipotle - slide 1
01 / 25Module 6: cost of capital & Valuation Company: chipotle
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Module 6: cost of capital & Valuation Company: chipotle
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Module 6: cost of capital & ValuationCompany: chipotle Matt Ramirez

  2. Chipotle background • Mexican grill that focuses on serving quality food while maintaining speed and efficiency • Found in 1993 by Steve Ells in Denver, Colorado • Considered a “fast-casual” restaurant: food that is served fast without the “fast food” methods or ambiance, allows customers to eat “on the go” or in a nicer restaurant environment • Not franchised, centrally-owned

  3. Cost of capital

  4. Risk elements Sources of Risk

  5. Risk elements • Risk of Equity: driven by inherent riskiness of enterprise (management, market, etc.) and cost of debt (debt holders have first claim on FCFs) • Enterprise Capital: estimated as a weighted average of estimated cost of debt and estimated cost of equity capital • rent= (rd x Vd/Vent) + (req x Veq/Vent)

  6. Beta estimation

  7. Regression analysis (previous 60 months) rEqt – rrft = α + β(rMkt – rrft) + et

  8. Regression interpretation • α: relatively large (estimates around 3% excess return in addition to CAPM calculation) but unstable (large range), meaning it could be null or have an even larger effect • β: large (greater than most analyst estimates), unstable (large range) meaning change in market could have even smaller effect than expected or be much more significant • Standard errors: Large gaps- 95% of confidence for α is between .007 and .059 and for β between .44 and 1.3 • Overall: not confident with results

  9. Financial site Beta estimates • Google Finance .60 • NASDAQ .70 • MSN Money .60 • Reuters .82 • Yahoo! Finance .85 • NYSE .82 • Firstrade .85 • E-Trade .80 • Comcast Finance .82 • Zacks .60 • AVERAGE= .746

  10. Bloomberg beta estimate (raw beta chosen)

  11. Cost of equity

  12. Capital Asset pricing model (capm) • req = rrf + β(rmkt – rrf) • req = cost of equity capital • rrf = risk-free rate of return (30-year Treasury Bill) • rmkt = expected market return • β = beta coefficient • rmkt – rrf = market risk premium

  13. Capm values • rrf = 3.69% (from treasury.gov) • rmkt = 8.69% • β = .58 (Bloomberg raw beta) • rmkt – rrf = 5% (estimate)

  14. Cost of equity (capm) calculation

  15. Cost of debt

  16. Method 1: rnfl • RNFL= FEAT/avg(NFL)

  17. Method 2: borrowing rate • Cost of Debt= pretax borrowing rate x (1 – tax rate)

  18. Cost of debt comments • RNFL used: relatively steady values (around 0) throughout the years, small (as expected) • Borrowing rate: difficult to calculate for Chipotle (virtually no debt), -61%? (not comfortable using this value)

  19. Cost of enterprise capital/wacc

  20. Wacc calculation • rent= (rd x Vd/Vent) + (req x Veq/Vent)

  21. Bloomberg’s wacc

  22. Dcf’s with new wacc

  23. Dcf: calculated wacc

  24. Dcf: bloomberg’swacc

  25. Final thoughts • Calculated DCF provides a much closer result to enterprise value than original • Debt must be analyzed further: seemingly no debt within Chipotle’s financials • Difference between calculated DCF and Bloomberg’s (roughly 1 ½ %)- what is attributed to this?