1 / 23

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Examine Molecular Composition

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Examine Molecular Composition. Amy Baker R. Steven Turley Brigham Young University. Why Extreme Ultraviolet?. Thin Film or Multilayer Mirrors. EUV Lithography. Soft X-Ray Microscope. Earth’s Magnetosphere in the EUV.

silver
Télécharger la présentation

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Examine Molecular Composition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Examine Molecular Composition Amy Baker R. Steven Turley Brigham Young University

  2. Why Extreme Ultraviolet? Thin Film or Multilayer Mirrors EUV Lithography Soft X-Ray Microscope Earth’s Magnetosphere in the EUV Images from www.schott.com/magazine/english/info99/ and www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/xray-inside-cells.html.

  3. Why Thorium? • Only one oxidation state: ThO2 • Rock stable: Highest melting point (3300 deg C) of any known oxide. • High Reflectance in the EUV (10-100nm)

  4. Will Thorium Work? • The mirror’s surface will be oxidized. • At optical wavelengths, this oxidation is negligible. It is a major issue for our thin films, however. • We expect minimal oxidation

  5. Purposes of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy • Learn oxidation state of our thorium samples • Understand how composition changes with depth • Obtain an expression for oxidation as a function of depth

  6. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

  7. How XPS works

  8. Th 4f5/2 4f7/2 Th O 4d3/2 4d5/2 1s Th C 5d3/2 5d5/2 1s Electron Binding Energy

  9. Peak Shifts • Thorium peaks on surface • Thorium peaks after oxygen is gone

  10. e- X-ray Source Analyzer θ e- e- Sample Depth Profiling • Rastering: Argon ions knock off individual atoms • Variable angle scans: More depth is obtained as x-ray gun and detector are moved towards incidence

  11. Variable Angle Results • Only penetrates about 150 Angstroms into the sample • This allows us to see surface contamination, but not composition with depth • Results are averaged: cannot obtain resolved composition with depth

  12. Rastering Results

  13. Too Much Oxidation • These samples were only a few hours old. • We need more uniformity. • Solution: Make ThO2 mirrors. Reflection is similar to Th and it should be more uniform.

  14. ThO2 Results

  15. Results • Fully oxidized thorium is much more uniform. • ThO2 shows definite promise as a durable reflector in the EUV. • Rastering is an effective depth profiling technique • Variable angle can be used as a surface technique

  16. Continued Research • Include modeled interface in calculating optical constants from reflectance data • Shape of sputtered area may affect rastering rate: use multilayer thin film stack to explore shape of sputtered region

  17. Acknowledgements A special thanks to R. Steven Turley David Allred Matt Linford Yi Lang BYU Thin Films Group Physics & Astronomy Department Funding ORCA Mentoring Grant NASA Space Grant

  18. Other Results of Interest • There was an increase in oxygen when the sample sat for more than 4 or 5 minutes in between sputtering/scans. • This was observed for 5 out of 5 samples that sat still between scans.

  19. * indicates where the sample stood for more than 4 or 5 minutes in between scans

  20. What Could This Be? • Hypothesis: This is likely due to preferential sputtering. • The argon ions will knock off oxygen atoms more readily than thorium. • While sputtering, scans would show less O than actually exists.

  21. Future Research • Test preferential sputtering hypothesis. • Investigate other peak anomalies: N, Ar • Obtain accurate sputtering rates

  22. Future Research • Shape of sputtered area may affect the sputtering rate. • Finally: Make and measure optical constants for thin films of otherelements.

More Related