1 / 16

FRGP Update

Join the Summit in establishing a collaborative overlay for managing regional connectivity and IT projects. Benefits include cost savings, improved governance, and enhanced network services. Embrace the objectives of shared governance, reliability, and resource sharing for comprehensive network development.

sirius
Télécharger la présentation

FRGP Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FRGP Update Marla Meehl, NCAR

  2. Review and update topic list • Summit • Western Region Networking (WRN) • Stimulus • Internet2 Membership Model

  3. Summit • Goal: establish a lightweight, nimble collaborative overlay above the Front Range GigaPoP (FRGP) and the Utah Education Network (UEN) for managing regional connectivity (including peering) and potentially other related regional IT projects • Initial members: FRGP and UEN • Lightweight MoU with process open to other aggregating members over time

  4. Summit status – June 2009 (complete and in progress for FY2010) • Cooperative of Front Range Gigapop (FRGP) and Utah Education Network (UEN) to support advanced networking in Colorado, Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming • Connecting FRGP, Idaho Regional Optical Network (IRON), Idaho State University, and UEN • Bottom line savings • FY09 budget: $1.13M • FY10 budget: $863k (‘Scenario B’) • Overall reduction of 24% • Maintain regional geographic balance and diversity – NLR node in Denver and Internet2 node in Salt Lake City

  5. Summit governance • Policy Oversight Committee (SPOC) • Pat Burns, CSU & Steve Hess, Utah (co-chairs); Steve Corbató, Utah, Randy Gaines, ISU; Marla Meehl, NCAR; David Wood, UC-Boulder • Technical Operations Committee (STOC) • Steve Corbató, Utah & Marla Meehl, NCAR (co-chairs); Barry Bryson, UEN; Alex Hsia, NOAA-Boulder; Kevin Quire, UEN; Greg Redder, CSU, Pete Siemsen, NCAR; Jim Stewart, UEN

  6. Summit status – June 2009 (complete and in progress for FY10) • Services • Advanced IP connectivity • Internet2 – 10 Gbps – Salt Lake City • NLR – 10G – Denver • 10G wavelengths for transport • Two Denver-Salt Lake City • 1 production – Internet2 • 1 potentially for experiment/research – NLR • One Boise-Salt Lake City • Production in support of IRON – Internet2 • Internet2 Dynamic Circuit Network (DCN) connectivity • 2.5G – Denver (in support of Northrop Grumman) • NLR FrameNet connectivity (Denver)

  7. Summit status – June 2009 (complete and in progress for FY10) • Internet2 GENI network research support • Flux Research Group, School of Computing, University of Utah • Internet2 K-20 Network Sponsored Education Group Participant (SEGP) Program • Colorado • Idaho • Utah • FRGP R&E Network Member effective July 1 • Two seats at Internet2 connector ‘table’ • Commodity peering services • Internet2 CPS – Salt Lake City • TransitRail - Denver

  8. Western Region Networking (WRN) • A parallel discussion going on regarding possibility of a larger Western affinity group • An opportunity to improve network service for “the West”: • Arizona • California • Colorado • Idaho • New Mexico • Utah • Washington • Wyoming

  9. WRN • Intra-region peering • NLR and Internet2 services • Back each other up (provide diverse layer 2 and 3 if on-net failures) • Efficient and cost-effective commodity and Transit Rail (TR) and Commercial Peering Service (CPS) connections

  10. WRN - Objectives • Continue to be involved in NLR and I2 and influence their direction • Cost savings across WRN through resource sharing • Shared governance • Robustness, reliability, redundancy • Improved regional connections including primary and back-up I2, NLR, etc. • Improved national peering services from TransitRail and I2 CPS • Enables shared commodity amongst WRN • Improved purchasing options, e.g. single entity purchasing, back-up port fees • Improved multi-state network in support of Research & Education and economic development

  11. WRN - Objectives • Agree to WRN concept of resource sharing • Endorsed conceptual WRN engineering design that enables WRN members to share resources • Endorsed funding model: recurring and non-recurring • Year 1 • Year 2 • Execute Agreement

  12. Stimulus • FRGP NSF ARI for BiSON upgrade – LoI • FRGP NTIA BTOP for BiSON fiber build • Wyoming EPSCoR for BiSON

  13. Discussion / wrap-up Questions?

More Related