1 / 13

Validation of Blood Flow Simulations in Intracranial Aneurysms

Yue Yu. Validation of Blood Flow Simulations in Intracranial Aneurysms. Final-Project Presentation (Registration) ‏. Brown University. Finished: Generate 3d patient-specific mesh from Dicom files. Simulate concentration field inside with the mesh. Now:

sol
Télécharger la présentation

Validation of Blood Flow Simulations in Intracranial Aneurysms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Yue Yu Validation of Blood Flow Simulations in Intracranial Aneurysms Final-Project Presentation (Registration)‏ Brown University

  2. Finished: Generate 3d patient-specific mesh from Dicom files. Simulate concentration field inside with the mesh. Now: Fit the 3d results with 2d dye-injection image by 2d-3d image registration technique. Objective

  3. Registration • For every iteration of the registration algorithm a 3D rigid-body geometric transform is applied to the CT volume to produce a change in the 3D position of the arteries. • The 3D volume is then reduced to a 2D digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) by summing the voxel values of the transformed CT volume in the z direction. z Compare with y rotate translate x project 2d fluoroscopy frame 3d object DRR

  4. Registration • Assume pixel values of the filtered DRR are denoted by Iiand pixel values of the fluoroscopy frame are denoted by Ri, by minimizing the objective function • where • and is the histogram bin which includes Ri. . I_i . R_i • NOTE: • I didn't filter the data, because in our case not only the shape should match, the density on each pixel should also match. • Since the data size is huge (536by536by536), I took the R_i instead of its average.

  5. Registration • To optimize the objective function S(m), with Taylor expansion for the update vector p, • we can get an approximation for p as • where m=(Tx,Ty,Tz,Rx,Ry,Rz) contains the information for translation (T) and rotation (R). • In the implementation, I use the matlab optimization function • x = fminunc(fun,x0)‏ • Instead of optimizing all six parameters at one time, I optimize S with respect to rotation R first, then to translation T, and repeat this process for five times.

  6. Simple Tests • Translation only: • Rotation only: 2D DATA size: 35*35 when 17<x,y,z<25 density=1 3D DATA size: 65*65*65 when 32<x,y,z<40 density=1 FITTING RESULT T=(15, 15, 0.111) s=2.58e-13 Initial T=(17, 17, 1)‏ 2D DATA size: 35*35 when 17<x,y,z<25 density=1, rotate pi/3 3D DATA size: 65*65*65 when 32<x,y,z<40 density=1 FITTING RESULT R=(1.047, -5e-5, -5e-6) s=2.54e-7 Initial T=(17, 17, 1)‏

  7. Simple Tests • Translation and rotation: FITTING RESULT T=(14.5, 15.3, 0.082) R=(6.95, -2.91, 0.45)‏ s=3.56 2D DATA size: 35*35 created by 3D DATA rotating with R=(pi/3,pi/4,0)‏ Initial T=(15, 15, 1/9)‏ R=(0, 0, 0)‏ 3D DATA size: 65*65*65 when 32<x,y,z<40 density=1 FITTING RESULT T=(22.5, 17, 0.083) R=(0.52, 0.79, 0)‏ s=6.79e-3 Initial T=(15, 15, 1/9)‏ R=(pi/3, pi/4, 0)‏

  8. CT results: Comparison for arterial data: qualitative Computational results: T=0.22 (sec)‏ T=0.72 (sec)‏ T=0.22 (sec)‏ T=0.72 (sec)‏ T=1.22 (sec)‏ T=1.72 (sec)‏ T=1.22 (sec)‏ T=1.72 (sec)‏

  9. Quantitative comparison: Prepare Data • 2D data: • Considering the geometric differences near the aneurysm part, we cut upstream areas in 2d angiograms for comparison. • 3D data: • Invert plt concentration field data into 536by536by536 matlab 3d matrix. For easier comparison, change the 2d and 3d data to black background, that is, the values for background pixels are zero.

  10. Quantitative comparison: Coarse to fine • Coarse: • Condense both the 2d and 3d data into 1/16 of their original sizes and apply the fitting algorithm, get optimal parameters T_small and R_small. • Fine: • Now apply the algorithm to data with original size, with initial values for T and R as • T=16*T_small • R=R_small • Because of the lack of time, we use data with ¼ of the original size as our fine results.

  11. Quantitative comparison: Results T=0.22 (sec)‏ T=0.72 (sec)‏ T=1.22 (sec)‏ 2D data Fitted 3D data Relative error |I-R| 5.61% 4.05% 5.80%

  12. Conclusion: For rotation or translation only, the fitting algorithm gives satisfying results for different initial values. However, to fit with both rotation and translation effects, a good guess for initial values is important for reasonable results. The concentration field calculated from simulated velocity field matches well with the angiograms from dye injection (relative error |I-R| around 5%). Conclusions

  13. References • Juan R. Cebral, Alessandro Radaelli, Alejandro Frangi, and Christopher M. Putman, Qualitative Comparison of Intra-aneurysmal Flow Structures Determined from Conventional and Virtual Angiograms, Medical Imaging 2007: Physiology, Function, and Structure from Medical Images. • Matthew D. Ford, Gordan R. Stuhne, Hristo N. Nikolov, Damiaan F. Habets, Stephen P. Lownie, David W. Holdsworth, and David A. Steinman, Virtual Angiography for Visualization and Validation of Computational Models of Aneurysm Hemodynamics, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 25, No. 12, 2005. • M. Pickering, A. Muhit, J. Scarvell, and P. Smith, A new multimodalsimilarity measure for fast gradient-based 2D-3D imageregistration, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Engineering in Medicineand Biology (EMBC), Minneapolis, USA, 2009, pp. 5821-5824. Thank you!

More Related